Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a focus on patients with impaired ejection fraction.
{"title":"Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a focus on patients with impaired ejection fraction.","authors":"Yodo Gatate, Mitsunobu Nagai, Keisuke Matsuo, Hiroki Hoya, Saki Hasegawa-Tamba, Michiru Nomoto, Takahide Arai, Shintaro Nakano","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the prognostic value of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) normalized to creatinine in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), focusing on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 144 patients emergently admitted for ACS, with urinary NGAL measured 4-48 h postadmission. Primary and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), respectively. Optimal NGAL/creatinine cutoffs were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Associations between urinary NGAL/creatinine and clinical outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median 734.5-day follow-up, 8 deaths and 44 MACCE occurred. The optimal NGAL/creatinine cutoff for predicting MACCE was 20.85 ng/mg creatinine. All deaths occurred in the high NGAL/creatinine group (≥20.85), but mortality analyses were limited by statistical separation. High NGAL/creatinine was significantly associated with MACCE (hazard ratio = 3.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.61-7.47) and remained associated with a higher event hazard after adjustment for age, brain natriuretic peptide, LVEF, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.75; P = 0.017). In subgroup analyses, the area under the curve for MACCE was numerically higher in patients with LVEF <50% than in those with LVEF ≥50% (0.753 vs. 0.581). Formal interaction testing in the Cox model, however, did not demonstrate significant effect modification by LVEF category (P for interaction = 0.100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urinary NGAL/creatinine was significantly associated with long-term MACCE in patients with ACS. Although subgroup analyses showed numerically different associations according to LVEF, formal interaction testing did not demonstrate significant effect modification by LVEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the prognostic value of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) normalized to creatinine in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), focusing on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 144 patients emergently admitted for ACS, with urinary NGAL measured 4-48 h postadmission. Primary and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), respectively. Optimal NGAL/creatinine cutoffs were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Associations between urinary NGAL/creatinine and clinical outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.
Results: During a median 734.5-day follow-up, 8 deaths and 44 MACCE occurred. The optimal NGAL/creatinine cutoff for predicting MACCE was 20.85 ng/mg creatinine. All deaths occurred in the high NGAL/creatinine group (≥20.85), but mortality analyses were limited by statistical separation. High NGAL/creatinine was significantly associated with MACCE (hazard ratio = 3.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.61-7.47) and remained associated with a higher event hazard after adjustment for age, brain natriuretic peptide, LVEF, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.75; P = 0.017). In subgroup analyses, the area under the curve for MACCE was numerically higher in patients with LVEF <50% than in those with LVEF ≥50% (0.753 vs. 0.581). Formal interaction testing in the Cox model, however, did not demonstrate significant effect modification by LVEF category (P for interaction = 0.100).
Conclusion: Urinary NGAL/creatinine was significantly associated with long-term MACCE in patients with ACS. Although subgroup analyses showed numerically different associations according to LVEF, formal interaction testing did not demonstrate significant effect modification by LVEF.
期刊介绍:
Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management.
Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.