Serrated polyp detection rates beyond adenoma detection rate for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: findings from the SCREESCO trial.

IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy Pub Date : 2026-10-16 DOI:10.1055/a-2955-8529
Masau Sekiguchi, Marcus Westerberg, Anna Andreasson, Soran R Bozorg, Anna M Forsberg
{"title":"Serrated polyp detection rates beyond adenoma detection rate for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: findings from the SCREESCO trial.","authors":"Masau Sekiguchi, Marcus Westerberg, Anna Andreasson, Soran R Bozorg, Anna M Forsberg","doi":"10.1055/a-2955-8529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between serrated polyp detection rates, including proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR), and postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) remains unestablished. We investigated PCCRC incidence and characteristics, and explored associations of PSPDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) with PCCRC in colonoscopy- and fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening within the Screening of Swedish Colons (SCREESCO) trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from participants who underwent colonoscopy in the colonoscopy and FIT arms were analyzed. PCCRC, defined as colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed >6 months after a colonoscopy that did not detect CRC, was identified through linkage with cancer registries. Associations between PSPDR and PCCRC incidence were assessed using Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 9982 and 5875 individuals in the colonoscopy and FIT arms, PCCRC was identified in 20 and 17 individuals, with 3-year PCCRC rates of 5.9% (3/51) and 3.5% (4/115), respectively. Compared with screening-detected CRC, PCCRC more often involved right-sided location and advanced stage. The 5-year cumulative incidence of PCCRC was 0.16% (95%CI 0.10%-0.27%) and 0.06% (95%CI 0.02%-0.15%) when colonoscopies were performed by endoscopists with low vs. high PSPDR (<10% vs. ≥10%), respectively. Among endoscopists with high ADR, 5-year PCCRC incidence was 0.13% (95%CI 0.04%-0.32%) vs. 0.06% (95%CI 0.02%-0.16%) for those with low vs. high PSPDR, respectively. Within this group, PCCRC incidence over 8 years decreased as PSPDR increased (hazard ratio per percentage-point increase, 0.90; 95%CI 0.82-1.00; P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the limited number of PCCRC events, this study suggests that PSPDR provides complementary information beyond ADR for identifying colonoscopies with higher PCCRC incidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":11516,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2955-8529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between serrated polyp detection rates, including proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR), and postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) remains unestablished. We investigated PCCRC incidence and characteristics, and explored associations of PSPDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) with PCCRC in colonoscopy- and fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening within the Screening of Swedish Colons (SCREESCO) trial.

Methods: Data from participants who underwent colonoscopy in the colonoscopy and FIT arms were analyzed. PCCRC, defined as colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed >6 months after a colonoscopy that did not detect CRC, was identified through linkage with cancer registries. Associations between PSPDR and PCCRC incidence were assessed using Cox models.

Results: Of 9982 and 5875 individuals in the colonoscopy and FIT arms, PCCRC was identified in 20 and 17 individuals, with 3-year PCCRC rates of 5.9% (3/51) and 3.5% (4/115), respectively. Compared with screening-detected CRC, PCCRC more often involved right-sided location and advanced stage. The 5-year cumulative incidence of PCCRC was 0.16% (95%CI 0.10%-0.27%) and 0.06% (95%CI 0.02%-0.15%) when colonoscopies were performed by endoscopists with low vs. high PSPDR (<10% vs. ≥10%), respectively. Among endoscopists with high ADR, 5-year PCCRC incidence was 0.13% (95%CI 0.04%-0.32%) vs. 0.06% (95%CI 0.02%-0.16%) for those with low vs. high PSPDR, respectively. Within this group, PCCRC incidence over 8 years decreased as PSPDR increased (hazard ratio per percentage-point increase, 0.90; 95%CI 0.82-1.00; P = 0.04).

Conclusions: Despite the limited number of PCCRC events, this study suggests that PSPDR provides complementary information beyond ADR for identifying colonoscopies with higher PCCRC incidence.

结肠镜后结直肠癌的锯齿状息肉检出率高于腺瘤检出率:来自SCREESCO试验的结果。
背景:锯齿状息肉检出率(包括近端锯齿状息肉检出率(PSPDR))与结肠镜后结直肠癌(PCCRC)之间的关系尚未确定。在瑞典结肠筛查(SCREESCO)试验中,我们调查了PCCRC的发病率和特征,并探讨了PSPDR和腺瘤检出率(ADR)与结肠镜和粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)筛查中PCCRC的关系。方法:对结肠镜检查组和FIT组中接受结肠镜检查的参与者的数据进行分析。PCCRC,定义为在结肠镜检查未检测到CRC的6个月后诊断出的结直肠癌(CRC),通过与癌症登记处的联系确定。使用Cox模型评估PSPDR和PCCRC发病率之间的关系。结果:在结肠镜检查组和FIT组的9982例和5875例患者中,PCCRC患者分别为20例和17例,3年PCCRC发生率分别为5.9%(3/51)和3.5%(4/115)。与筛查检出的结直肠癌相比,PCCRC多累及右侧部位和晚期。由PSPDR低与高的内镜医师进行结肠镜检查时,PCCRC的5年累积发病率分别为0.16% (95%CI 0.10%-0.27%)和0.06% (95%CI 0.02%-0.15%)。结论:尽管PCCRC事件数量有限,但本研究表明,PSPDR为识别PCCRC发生率较高的结肠镜检查提供了除不良反应之外的补充信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy
Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
1401
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Endoscopy is a leading journal covering the latest technologies and global advancements in gastrointestinal endoscopy. With guidance from an international editorial board, it delivers high-quality content catering to the needs of endoscopists, surgeons, clinicians, and researchers worldwide. Publishing 12 issues each year, Endoscopy offers top-quality review articles, original contributions, prospective studies, surveys of diagnostic and therapeutic advances, and comprehensive coverage of key national and international meetings. Additionally, articles often include supplementary online video content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书