BRCAness-Driven Prognostic Model and Regimen-Specific Therapeutic Implications in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer With Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Hangcheng Xu, Yan Wang, Qiang Sa, Yiran Zhou, Fei Ma, Ying Fan, Pin Zhang, Qing Li, Qiao Li, Yang Luo, Ruigang Cai, Hongnan Mo, Bo Lan, Jiani Wang, Shanshan Chen, Jiayu Wang, Binghe Xu
{"title":"BRCAness-Driven Prognostic Model and Regimen-Specific Therapeutic Implications in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer With Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.","authors":"Hangcheng Xu, Yan Wang, Qiang Sa, Yiran Zhou, Fei Ma, Ying Fan, Pin Zhang, Qing Li, Qiao Li, Yang Luo, Ruigang Cai, Hongnan Mo, Bo Lan, Jiani Wang, Shanshan Chen, Jiayu Wang, Binghe Xu","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BRCAness, a phenotype associated with homologous recombination deficiency, has not been fully characterized in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), especially regarding prognosis and regimen-specific postoperative management. We analyzed 137 patients with TNBC who had residual invasive disease after NAC. BRCAness status was assessed in surgical specimens using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Its associations with clinicopathological features and survival were evaluated according to NAC regimen, and prognostic models for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were developed by combining BRCAness with clinicopathological variables. BRCAness was identified in 42.3% of tumors and was associated with high histological grade, high Ki-67, and perineural invasion. Patients with BRCAness-positive tumors had worse survival than those with BRCAness-negative tumors (5-year DFS, 50.0% vs. 68.2%, p = 0.020; 5-year OS, 58.6% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.014). This prognostic effect was evident in patients treated with anthracycline-based NAC, but not in those treated with platinum-based regimens. Models incorporating BRCAness showed good discrimination (DFS C-index, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.78; OS C-index, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81). Among BRCAness-positive patients who had received anthracycline-based NAC, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better survival (5-year DFS, 55.6% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.035; 5-year OS, 66.7% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.023). BRCAness was associated with poorer outcome in residual TNBC after NAC and may help identify patients with different prognoses and postoperative treatment patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BRCAness, a phenotype associated with homologous recombination deficiency, has not been fully characterized in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), especially regarding prognosis and regimen-specific postoperative management. We analyzed 137 patients with TNBC who had residual invasive disease after NAC. BRCAness status was assessed in surgical specimens using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Its associations with clinicopathological features and survival were evaluated according to NAC regimen, and prognostic models for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were developed by combining BRCAness with clinicopathological variables. BRCAness was identified in 42.3% of tumors and was associated with high histological grade, high Ki-67, and perineural invasion. Patients with BRCAness-positive tumors had worse survival than those with BRCAness-negative tumors (5-year DFS, 50.0% vs. 68.2%, p = 0.020; 5-year OS, 58.6% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.014). This prognostic effect was evident in patients treated with anthracycline-based NAC, but not in those treated with platinum-based regimens. Models incorporating BRCAness showed good discrimination (DFS C-index, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.78; OS C-index, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81). Among BRCAness-positive patients who had received anthracycline-based NAC, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better survival (5-year DFS, 55.6% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.035; 5-year OS, 66.7% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.023). BRCAness was associated with poorer outcome in residual TNBC after NAC and may help identify patients with different prognoses and postoperative treatment patterns.

brcaness驱动的预后模型和方案特异性治疗对新辅助化疗后残留病变的三阴性乳腺癌的影响
BRCAness是一种与同源重组缺陷相关的表型,在新辅助化疗(NAC)后残留疾病的三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中尚未完全表征,特别是在预后和方案特异性术后管理方面。我们分析了137例NAC后残留侵袭性疾病的TNBC患者。使用多重结扎依赖探针扩增(MLPA)评估手术标本的BRCAness状态。根据NAC方案评估其与临床病理特征和生存的相关性,并将BRCAness与临床病理变量相结合,建立无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的预后模型。在42.3%的肿瘤中发现BRCAness,并与高组织学分级、高Ki-67和神经周围浸润相关。brcaness阳性肿瘤患者的生存率低于brcaness阴性肿瘤患者(5年DFS, 50.0%比68.2%,p = 0.020; 5年OS, 58.6%比78.1%,p = 0.014)。这种预后效应在蒽环类药物NAC治疗的患者中很明显,但在铂类药物治疗的患者中则不明显。纳入BRCAness的模型具有良好的判别性(DFS C-index, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.78; OS C-index, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81)。在接受蒽环类药物NAC的brcaness阳性患者中,辅助化疗与更好的生存率相关(5年DFS, 55.6%比27.3%,p = 0.035; 5年OS, 66.7%比36.4%,p = 0.023)。BRCAness与NAC后残留TNBC预后较差相关,可能有助于识别具有不同预后和术后治疗模式的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书