National Park Core Zones Do Not Buffer Insect Pollinators Against Occupancy Declines

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
George Allen, Rob Cooke, Lucy Ridding, Ben Woodcock, Deepa Senapathi, Joann Sy, Michael Garratt
{"title":"National Park Core Zones Do Not Buffer Insect Pollinators Against Occupancy Declines","authors":"George Allen,&nbsp;Rob Cooke,&nbsp;Lucy Ridding,&nbsp;Ben Woodcock,&nbsp;Deepa Senapathi,&nbsp;Joann Sy,&nbsp;Michael Garratt","doi":"10.1111/ddi.70283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the extent to which French national parks mitigate pollinator declines and support biodiversity outcomes across protection gradients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Eight French national parks, including core zones, buffer zones, and surrounding non-park landscapes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analysed 290,540 occurrence records representing 610 pollinator species (Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Diptera) from 2000 to 2023. Species-level occupancy trends were estimated across core, buffer and non-park zones using standardised occupancy modelling frameworks applied consistently across taxa and protection levels. We quantified temporal changes in occupancy, species richness and community turnover, and compared patterns between rare and common species as well as among major taxonomic groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pollinator occupancy decreased by −41.1% in core zones, −34.0% in buffer zones and −26.6% outside of national parks over the period. Declines were disproportionately driven by losses of common species, which became ‘rarer’ while rare species became more ‘common’. Core zones harboured 27%–50% more rare species than non-park areas and reduced declines in common species richness by approximately 31%. Butterfly (205 sp.) occupancy declined more slowly in core zones (−0.62% year<sup>−1</sup>) than outside of parks (−2.23% year<sup>−1</sup>), whereas the occupancy of moths (324 sp.) declined more rapidly in core zones (−5.18% year<sup>−1</sup>) than elsewhere.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>French national parks partially mitigated pollinator declines by supporting rare species and slowing losses of some taxa, but they did not halt overall declines, even within strictly protected core zones. These findings suggest that protected areas alone are insufficient to reverse insect declines and that stronger or more targeted management interventions may be required if parks are to contribute meaningfully to pollinator conservation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"32 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To assess the extent to which French national parks mitigate pollinator declines and support biodiversity outcomes across protection gradients.

Location

Eight French national parks, including core zones, buffer zones, and surrounding non-park landscapes.

Methods

We analysed 290,540 occurrence records representing 610 pollinator species (Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Diptera) from 2000 to 2023. Species-level occupancy trends were estimated across core, buffer and non-park zones using standardised occupancy modelling frameworks applied consistently across taxa and protection levels. We quantified temporal changes in occupancy, species richness and community turnover, and compared patterns between rare and common species as well as among major taxonomic groups.

Results

Pollinator occupancy decreased by −41.1% in core zones, −34.0% in buffer zones and −26.6% outside of national parks over the period. Declines were disproportionately driven by losses of common species, which became ‘rarer’ while rare species became more ‘common’. Core zones harboured 27%–50% more rare species than non-park areas and reduced declines in common species richness by approximately 31%. Butterfly (205 sp.) occupancy declined more slowly in core zones (−0.62% year−1) than outside of parks (−2.23% year−1), whereas the occupancy of moths (324 sp.) declined more rapidly in core zones (−5.18% year−1) than elsewhere.

Main Conclusions

French national parks partially mitigated pollinator declines by supporting rare species and slowing losses of some taxa, but they did not halt overall declines, even within strictly protected core zones. These findings suggest that protected areas alone are insufficient to reverse insect declines and that stronger or more targeted management interventions may be required if parks are to contribute meaningfully to pollinator conservation.

国家公园核心区不能缓冲昆虫传粉者的占用率下降
目的评估法国国家公园在多大程度上缓解了传粉媒介的减少,并支持了跨保护梯度的生物多样性成果。八个法国国家公园,包括核心区、缓冲区和周边非公园景观。方法对2000 - 2023年共610种传粉昆虫(鳞翅目、膜翅目和双翅目)290,540份发生记录进行分析。使用标准化占用模型框架,在不同的分类群和保护级别上一致应用,估计了核心、缓冲和非公园区域的物种占用趋势。我们量化了占用率、物种丰富度和群落更替的时间变化,并比较了稀有和常见物种之间以及主要分类类群之间的格局。结果核心区传粉者占用率下降了- 41.1%,缓冲区下降了- 34.0%,国家公园外的传粉者占用率下降了- 26.6%。常见物种的减少不成比例地推动了物种数量的下降,这些物种变得“稀有”,而稀有物种变得“常见”。核心区的珍稀物种数量比非公园区域多27%-50%,普通物种丰富度的下降幅度减少了约31%。蝴蝶(205 sp.)在核心区的入住率(- 0.62%)比公园外(- 2.23%)下降得慢(- 0.62%),而飞蛾(324 sp.)在核心区的入住率(- 5.18%)比其他地方下降得快(- 5.18%)。法国国家公园通过支持稀有物种和减缓某些分类群的减少,部分缓解了传粉媒介的减少,但它们并没有阻止总体下降,即使在严格保护的核心区域也是如此。这些发现表明,保护区本身不足以扭转昆虫数量下降的趋势,如果公园要对传粉媒介的保护做出有意义的贡献,可能需要更强有力或更有针对性的管理干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书