Information sharing in a dual channel with an agency-selling platform

IF 3.5 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Wei Xing, Qi Sun, Fang Fu, Yongsheng Zhou
{"title":"Information sharing in a dual channel with an agency-selling platform","authors":"Wei Xing,&nbsp;Qi Sun,&nbsp;Fang Fu,&nbsp;Yongsheng Zhou","doi":"10.1111/itor.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The dual-channel sales based on an agency-selling platform and a physical retailer have been one of the most common supply chain structures for a variety of consumer products. This paper studies the information sharing decisions of an agency-selling platform and a physical retailer in a dual-channel supply chain where a supplier sells a product through these two channels. We find that the commission rate and channel competition intensity play an important role in determining the equilibrium sharing decisions. In particular, a large commission rate prevents the platform from sharing information with the supplier because the platform is worried that the shared information will be used by the supplier to optimize retail sales and thus cause the demand transfer from the platform to the retailer. By contrast, a large competition intensity forces the retailer to share information to seek a strong responsiveness of the retail price to updated demand. Interestingly, both the platform and the retailer may encounter a prisoner's dilemma and the undesirable “lose-lose” outcome could potentially be mitigated if the platform reduces its information accuracy. Moreover, the supplier's decision to buy information will make all three players more profitable when it cannot obtain information for free. This research highlights how equilibrium information sharing decisions are affected by the interaction between the platform's agency-selling mode and the wholesale price contract used in the retail channel. The findings also provide useful insights for managers to make their information sharing decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49176,"journal":{"name":"International Transactions in Operational Research","volume":"34 2","pages":"1245-1270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Transactions in Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/itor.70089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dual-channel sales based on an agency-selling platform and a physical retailer have been one of the most common supply chain structures for a variety of consumer products. This paper studies the information sharing decisions of an agency-selling platform and a physical retailer in a dual-channel supply chain where a supplier sells a product through these two channels. We find that the commission rate and channel competition intensity play an important role in determining the equilibrium sharing decisions. In particular, a large commission rate prevents the platform from sharing information with the supplier because the platform is worried that the shared information will be used by the supplier to optimize retail sales and thus cause the demand transfer from the platform to the retailer. By contrast, a large competition intensity forces the retailer to share information to seek a strong responsiveness of the retail price to updated demand. Interestingly, both the platform and the retailer may encounter a prisoner's dilemma and the undesirable “lose-lose” outcome could potentially be mitigated if the platform reduces its information accuracy. Moreover, the supplier's decision to buy information will make all three players more profitable when it cannot obtain information for free. This research highlights how equilibrium information sharing decisions are affected by the interaction between the platform's agency-selling mode and the wholesale price contract used in the retail channel. The findings also provide useful insights for managers to make their information sharing decisions.

与代理销售平台实现双渠道信息共享
基于代理销售平台和实体零售商的双渠道销售已经成为各种消费品最常见的供应链结构之一。本文研究了供应商通过两种渠道销售产品的双渠道供应链中代理销售平台和实体零售商的信息共享决策问题。我们发现佣金率和渠道竞争强度对均衡共享决策起着重要的决定作用。特别是,过高的佣金率会阻碍平台与供应商共享信息,因为平台担心共享的信息会被供应商用于优化零售,从而导致需求从平台转移到零售商。相比之下,大的竞争强度迫使零售商共享信息,以寻求零售价格对更新需求的强烈响应。有趣的是,平台和零售商都可能遇到囚徒困境,如果平台降低其信息准确性,可能会减轻不受欢迎的“双输”结果。此外,当供应商不能免费获得信息时,它购买信息的决定将使所有三个参与者都更有利可图。本研究强调了平台的代理销售模式与零售渠道中使用的批发价格合同之间的交互作用如何影响均衡信息共享决策。研究结果也为管理者做出信息共享决策提供了有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Transactions in Operational Research
International Transactions in Operational Research OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.90%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Transactions in Operational Research (ITOR) aims to advance the understanding and practice of Operational Research (OR) and Management Science internationally. Its scope includes: International problems, such as those of fisheries management, environmental issues, and global competitiveness International work done by major OR figures Studies of worldwide interest from nations with emerging OR communities National or regional OR work which has the potential for application in other nations Technical developments of international interest Specific organizational examples that can be applied in other countries National and international presentations of transnational interest Broadly relevant professional issues, such as those of ethics and practice Applications relevant to global industries, such as operations management, manufacturing, and logistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书