Physics-Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Energy Management in Fuel-Cell Hybrid UAVs

IF 3.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Fuel Cells Pub Date : 2026-10-11 DOI:10.1002/fuce.70171
Yi Li, Jianxin Pan, Huachen Du, Xinghe Fan, Yufei Wang, Xiaoxing Zhang, Zhaohu Fan
{"title":"Physics-Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Energy Management in Fuel-Cell Hybrid UAVs","authors":"Yi Li,&nbsp;Jianxin Pan,&nbsp;Huachen Du,&nbsp;Xinghe Fan,&nbsp;Yufei Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoxing Zhang,&nbsp;Zhaohu Fan","doi":"10.1002/fuce.70171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Fuel-cell hybrid UAVs require energy management strategies to maintain efficiency during rapid load transients. Existing methods often neglect the fuel cell's limited dynamic response, leading to frequent and abrupt power adjustments. To address this, we propose a physics-constrained energy management strategy based on the soft actor–critic (SAC) algorithm. A minimum fuel-cell power holding time and a maximum allowable power change are embedded into the control environment to ensure that the generated fuel-cell power commands satisfy the prescribed supervisory constraints. The proposed strategy is evaluated under multiple flight scenarios and compared with fuzzy logic (FL), equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS), and constrained dynamic programming (DP). The results show that SAC achieves a hydrogen consumption of 5.4679 g, only 0.32% higher than DP, while maintaining a final SOC of 59.67%. Its equivalent hydrogen consumption is 5.4811 g, which is 0.79% and 1.32% lower than those of ECMS and FL, respectively. Moreover, SAC achieves a fuel-cell power STD of 91.38 W, representing reductions of 41.82% and 47.05% compared with ECMS and FL, respectively, while the RMS of the fuel-cell power change rate is 25.29 W·s<sup>−1</sup>. These results demonstrate that the proposed strategy provides well-balanced performance in terms of hydrogen consumption, battery SOC regulation, and fuel-cell power regulation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12566,"journal":{"name":"Fuel Cells","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel Cells","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fuce.70171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fuel-cell hybrid UAVs require energy management strategies to maintain efficiency during rapid load transients. Existing methods often neglect the fuel cell's limited dynamic response, leading to frequent and abrupt power adjustments. To address this, we propose a physics-constrained energy management strategy based on the soft actor–critic (SAC) algorithm. A minimum fuel-cell power holding time and a maximum allowable power change are embedded into the control environment to ensure that the generated fuel-cell power commands satisfy the prescribed supervisory constraints. The proposed strategy is evaluated under multiple flight scenarios and compared with fuzzy logic (FL), equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS), and constrained dynamic programming (DP). The results show that SAC achieves a hydrogen consumption of 5.4679 g, only 0.32% higher than DP, while maintaining a final SOC of 59.67%. Its equivalent hydrogen consumption is 5.4811 g, which is 0.79% and 1.32% lower than those of ECMS and FL, respectively. Moreover, SAC achieves a fuel-cell power STD of 91.38 W, representing reductions of 41.82% and 47.05% compared with ECMS and FL, respectively, while the RMS of the fuel-cell power change rate is 25.29 W·s−1. These results demonstrate that the proposed strategy provides well-balanced performance in terms of hydrogen consumption, battery SOC regulation, and fuel-cell power regulation.

基于物理约束的燃料电池混合动力无人机能量管理强化学习
燃料电池混合动力无人机需要能量管理策略来保持快速负载瞬变期间的效率。现有的方法往往忽略了燃料电池有限的动态响应,导致频繁和突然的功率调整。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种基于软行为者批评家(SAC)算法的物理约束能量管理策略。在控制环境中嵌入最小燃料电池功率保持时间和最大允许功率变化,以确保生成的燃料电池功率命令满足规定的监督约束。在多种飞行场景下对该策略进行了评估,并与模糊逻辑(FL)、等效消耗最小化策略(ECMS)和约束动态规划(DP)进行了比较。结果表明,SAC的耗氢量为5.4679 g,仅比DP高0.32%,而最终SOC保持在59.67%。其等效耗氢量为5.4811 g,比ECMS和FL分别降低0.79%和1.32%。SAC的燃料电池功率STD为91.38 W,比ECMS和FL分别降低了41.82%和47.05%,而燃料电池功率变化率的RMS为25.29 W·s−1。这些结果表明,所提出的策略在氢消耗、电池SOC调节和燃料电池功率调节方面提供了良好的平衡性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fuel Cells
Fuel Cells 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
31
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: This journal is only available online from 2011 onwards. Fuel Cells — From Fundamentals to Systems publishes on all aspects of fuel cells, ranging from their molecular basis to their applications in systems such as power plants, road vehicles and power sources in portables. Fuel Cells is a platform for scientific exchange in a diverse interdisciplinary field. All related work in -chemistry- materials science- physics- chemical engineering- electrical engineering- mechanical engineering- is included. Fuel Cells—From Fundamentals to Systems has an International Editorial Board and Editorial Advisory Board, with each Editor being a renowned expert representing a key discipline in the field from either a distinguished academic institution or one of the globally leading companies. Fuel Cells—From Fundamentals to Systems is designed to meet the needs of scientists and engineers who are actively working in the field. Until now, information on materials, stack technology and system approaches has been dispersed over a number of traditional scientific journals dedicated to classical disciplines such as electrochemistry, materials science or power technology. Fuel Cells—From Fundamentals to Systems concentrates on the publication of peer-reviewed original research papers and reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书