Biochar-Driven Microbial Shifts Enhance Feed Digestibility and Mitigate Methane Emissions in Hybrid Pennisetum Silage

IF 4.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Jie Qiao, Shuangshuang Bu, Jue Li, Jing Zhou, Fulin Yang
{"title":"Biochar-Driven Microbial Shifts Enhance Feed Digestibility and Mitigate Methane Emissions in Hybrid Pennisetum Silage","authors":"Jie Qiao,&nbsp;Shuangshuang Bu,&nbsp;Jue Li,&nbsp;Jing Zhou,&nbsp;Fulin Yang","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To mitigate environmental pollution caused by the large-scale accumulation of livestock manure and to investigate synergistic pathways for efficient agricultural waste utilisation, improved silage quality, and enhanced feed use, this study used hybrid <i>Pennisetum</i> as the raw material. The experiment included four treatment groups: a control group without additives (CK, 10 mL of sterile water), cellulase group (CE, 5 g/kg fresh material), propionate group (PA, 5 mL/kg fresh material), and cow dung biochar group (BC, 40 g/kg dry matter). Samples were collected at 14, 28, and 56 days after silage preparation to measure various indicators. The results showed that BC treatment not only improved fermentation quality but also increased in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) by 2.71% and reduced methane production by 20%. Membership function analysis revealed that CE treatment exhibited the highest silage quality (membership value, 0.7238). Microbial community analysis indicated that all treatments significantly increased the abundance of Firmicutes and decreased the abundance of Proteobacteria (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Notably, <i>Lactobacillus</i> was significantly increased in the PA group and <i>Pediococcus</i> in the BC group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Functional prediction based on PICRUSt2 showed that PA improved the silage quality of hybrid <i>Pennisetum</i> by upregulating carbohydrate and energy metabolism pathways. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that biochar prepared from cow dung had a positive effect on the silage of hybrid <i>Pennisetum</i>, offering a new approach for the resource utilisation of livestock waste in animal husbandry.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"18 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70186","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To mitigate environmental pollution caused by the large-scale accumulation of livestock manure and to investigate synergistic pathways for efficient agricultural waste utilisation, improved silage quality, and enhanced feed use, this study used hybrid Pennisetum as the raw material. The experiment included four treatment groups: a control group without additives (CK, 10 mL of sterile water), cellulase group (CE, 5 g/kg fresh material), propionate group (PA, 5 mL/kg fresh material), and cow dung biochar group (BC, 40 g/kg dry matter). Samples were collected at 14, 28, and 56 days after silage preparation to measure various indicators. The results showed that BC treatment not only improved fermentation quality but also increased in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) by 2.71% and reduced methane production by 20%. Membership function analysis revealed that CE treatment exhibited the highest silage quality (membership value, 0.7238). Microbial community analysis indicated that all treatments significantly increased the abundance of Firmicutes and decreased the abundance of Proteobacteria (p < 0.05). Notably, Lactobacillus was significantly increased in the PA group and Pediococcus in the BC group (p < 0.05). Functional prediction based on PICRUSt2 showed that PA improved the silage quality of hybrid Pennisetum by upregulating carbohydrate and energy metabolism pathways. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that biochar prepared from cow dung had a positive effect on the silage of hybrid Pennisetum, offering a new approach for the resource utilisation of livestock waste in animal husbandry.

生物炭驱动的微生物转变提高了杂交狼尾草青贮饲料的消化率并减少了甲烷排放
为了减轻畜禽粪便大规模积累造成的环境污染,并探索有效利用农业废弃物、提高青贮质量和提高饲料利用率的协同途径,本研究以杂交狼尾草为原料。试验分为4个处理组:无添加剂对照组(CK,无菌水10 mL)、纤维素酶组(CE,鲜料5 g/kg)、丙酸组(PA,鲜料5 mL/kg)、牛粪生物炭组(BC,干料40 g/kg)。分别于青贮后14、28、56 d采集样品,测定各项指标。结果表明,BC处理不仅提高了发酵品质,而且使体外干物质消化率提高了2.71%,甲烷产量降低了20%。隶属函数分析表明,CE处理青贮品质最高(隶属值为0.7238)。微生物群落分析表明,所有处理均显著提高了厚壁菌门的丰度,降低了变形菌门的丰度(p < 0.05)。值得注意的是,PA组乳酸杆菌显著增加,BC组Pediococcus显著增加(p < 0.05)。基于PICRUSt2的功能预测表明,PA通过上调碳水化合物和能量代谢途径改善杂交狼尾草青贮品质。综上所述,本研究表明,牛粪制备的生物炭对杂交狼尾草青贮具有积极的效果,为畜禽粪便资源化利用在畜牧业中提供了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书