Caribbean SIDS productivity collapse: Growth accounting evidence and policy pathways for revival

IF 2.1 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Olugbenga A. Onafowora
{"title":"Caribbean SIDS productivity collapse: Growth accounting evidence and policy pathways for revival","authors":"Olugbenga A. Onafowora","doi":"10.1111/dpr.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>Caribbean Small Island Developing States (SIDS) have fallen off-track on multiple Sustainable Development Goals due to a sustained post-2000 productivity collapse that eroded earlier Millennium Development Goals gains. With the 2030 deadline approaching, restoring productive capacity is both an economic and development urgency, with direct implications for SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth), SDG 9 (industry, innovation, and infrastructure), SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy), and SDG 13 (climate action).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study documents and explains the long-term growth deceleration in Caribbean SIDS and identifies a sequenced structural reform agenda to reverse it. Taking the growth accounting diagnosis of Amundsen et al. (2025) as the empirical baseline, the article asks: which productivity components drive the slowdown, and what reforms could restore growth momentum and re-engage the region with the SDGs? The primary contribution is a policy-oriented companion analysis that links aggregate patterns to microeconomic constraints and develops an actionable, politically realistic, three-phase reform package.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Growth accounting decomposes real GDP growth and potential output across two periods (1981–2000 and 2001–2019) for 15 Caribbean economies, with real GDP growth also reported for 1980–2000 and 2001–2023. Contributions from total factor productivity (TFP), human capital, population, and physical capital are estimated and compared, with robustness checks across capital share, depreciation, and human capital specifications. The findings are linked to microeconomic constraints through firm-level and sectoral evidence framed as hypotheses consistent with the aggregate residual.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Average real GDP growth fell from 2.64% to 1.45%, while potential growth declined from 3.3 to 1.6 percentage points. TFP contributions collapsed 83% (0.6 to 0.1 pp) and human capital plus population contributions fell 53% (1.5 to 0.7 pp); together these productivity-related factors explain 76% of the deceleration. A three-phase reform agenda follows: regulatory digitalization and e-government (Phase I); financial deepening via digital payments and insolvency reform (Phase II); and renewable energy transition through regional cooperation (Phase III).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Macroeconomic stabilization is necessary but insufficient. Coordinated structural reforms targeting microeconomic constraints can operationalize progress on SDG 7, 8, 9, 13, and 17, while inclusive reform design advances SDG 1 and SDG 10. With sustained political commitment, potential growth could move toward the pre-2000 range within a decade, helping re-engage Caribbean SIDS with the SDG agenda by 2030. Quantitative magnitudes drawn from external studies should be interpreted cautiously given limited external validity for small, tourism-dependent, climate-vulnerable islands.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":"44 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.70097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivation

Caribbean Small Island Developing States (SIDS) have fallen off-track on multiple Sustainable Development Goals due to a sustained post-2000 productivity collapse that eroded earlier Millennium Development Goals gains. With the 2030 deadline approaching, restoring productive capacity is both an economic and development urgency, with direct implications for SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth), SDG 9 (industry, innovation, and infrastructure), SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy), and SDG 13 (climate action).

Purpose

This study documents and explains the long-term growth deceleration in Caribbean SIDS and identifies a sequenced structural reform agenda to reverse it. Taking the growth accounting diagnosis of Amundsen et al. (2025) as the empirical baseline, the article asks: which productivity components drive the slowdown, and what reforms could restore growth momentum and re-engage the region with the SDGs? The primary contribution is a policy-oriented companion analysis that links aggregate patterns to microeconomic constraints and develops an actionable, politically realistic, three-phase reform package.

Approach and Methods

Growth accounting decomposes real GDP growth and potential output across two periods (1981–2000 and 2001–2019) for 15 Caribbean economies, with real GDP growth also reported for 1980–2000 and 2001–2023. Contributions from total factor productivity (TFP), human capital, population, and physical capital are estimated and compared, with robustness checks across capital share, depreciation, and human capital specifications. The findings are linked to microeconomic constraints through firm-level and sectoral evidence framed as hypotheses consistent with the aggregate residual.

Findings

Average real GDP growth fell from 2.64% to 1.45%, while potential growth declined from 3.3 to 1.6 percentage points. TFP contributions collapsed 83% (0.6 to 0.1 pp) and human capital plus population contributions fell 53% (1.5 to 0.7 pp); together these productivity-related factors explain 76% of the deceleration. A three-phase reform agenda follows: regulatory digitalization and e-government (Phase I); financial deepening via digital payments and insolvency reform (Phase II); and renewable energy transition through regional cooperation (Phase III).

Policy Implications

Macroeconomic stabilization is necessary but insufficient. Coordinated structural reforms targeting microeconomic constraints can operationalize progress on SDG 7, 8, 9, 13, and 17, while inclusive reform design advances SDG 1 and SDG 10. With sustained political commitment, potential growth could move toward the pre-2000 range within a decade, helping re-engage Caribbean SIDS with the SDG agenda by 2030. Quantitative magnitudes drawn from external studies should be interpreted cautiously given limited external validity for small, tourism-dependent, climate-vulnerable islands.

加勒比小岛屿发展中国家生产力崩溃:增长核算证据和复兴的政策途径
2000年后,加勒比小岛屿发展中国家(SIDS)生产力持续下降,削弱了早期千年发展目标的成果,导致其在多项可持续发展目标上偏离了轨道。随着2030年最后期限的临近,恢复生产能力既是一项紧迫的经济和发展任务,对可持续发展目标8(体面工作和经济增长)、可持续发展目标9(工业、创新和基础设施)、可持续发展目标7(负担得起的清洁能源)和可持续发展目标13(气候行动)具有直接影响。本研究记录并解释了加勒比小岛屿发展中国家的长期增长减速,并确定了一个顺序的结构改革议程来扭转这一趋势。本文以Amundsen et al.(2025)的增长核算诊断作为实证基准,提出了以下问题:哪些生产率组成部分推动了经济放缓,哪些改革可以恢复增长势头并使该地区重新参与可持续发展目标?主要贡献是一项以政策为导向的配套分析,将总体模式与微观经济制约因素联系起来,并制定出一套可行的、政治上现实的三期改革方案。增长核算对15个加勒比经济体在两个时期(1981-2000年和2001-2019年)的实际GDP增长和潜在产出进行了分解,并报告了1980-2000年和2001-2023年的实际GDP增长。对全要素生产率(TFP)、人力资本、人口和物质资本的贡献进行了估计和比较,并对资本份额、折旧和人力资本规格进行了稳健性检查。研究结果通过公司层面和部门证据与微观经济约束联系起来,这些证据被框架为与总残差一致的假设。平均实际GDP增长率从2.64%降至1.45%,潜在增长率从3.3个百分点降至1.6个百分点。TFP贡献下降了83% (0.6 - 0.1 pp),人力资本加人口贡献下降了53% (1.5 - 0.7 pp);这些与生产率相关的因素加起来解释了76%的减速。改革议程分为三个阶段:监管数字化和电子政务(第一阶段);通过数字支付和破产改革进行金融深化(第二阶段);通过区域合作实现可再生能源转型(第三阶段)。宏观经济稳定是必要的,但还不够。针对微观经济制约因素的协调结构性改革可以实现可持续发展目标7、8、9、13和17的进展,而包容性改革设计可以推进可持续发展目标1和10。有了持续的政治承诺,潜在增长可能在十年内达到2000年前的水平,从而帮助加勒比小岛屿发展中国家在2030年之前重新参与可持续发展目标议程。考虑到依赖旅游业、易受气候影响的小岛屿的外部有效性有限,应谨慎解释外部研究得出的数量幅度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书