Threshold effects of carbon cost internalization on financial performance in green bio-manufacturing enterprises

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Industrial Crops and Products Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2026.124529
Lili Wang, Jie Li, ShaQing Mao
{"title":"Threshold effects of carbon cost internalization on financial performance in green bio-manufacturing enterprises","authors":"Lili Wang,&nbsp;Jie Li,&nbsp;ShaQing Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.indcrop.2026.124529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how carbon cost internalization (CCI) affects the financial performance of green bio-manufacturing enterprises, with particular attention to threshold nonlinearities and transmission mechanisms. Using a panel of 484 Chinese A-share bio-manufacturing firms from 2010 to 2023 (N = 6958 firm-year observations), we construct a five-component CCI index via principal component analysis and apply Hansen (1999) double-threshold regression to identify two critical turning points at CCI= 0.342 and CCI= 0.586. Regime-specific estimation reveals that the CCI-to-ROA coefficient rises monotonically across the three regimes: 0.028 in the low-internalization regime, 0.092 in the intermediate regime, and 0.148 in the high-internalization regime, indicating that financial returns to carbon cost absorption are superlinear rather than proportional. Bootstrap mediation analysis identifies four transmission channels: green technology innovation (29.5%), ESG performance improvement (21.6%), capital structure adjustment (15.9%), and supply chain decarbonization (11.6%), collectively explaining 78.6% of the total CCI effect on ROA. Moderation analysis confirms that the CCI-financial performance relationship is amplified for firms in high-carbon-intensity industries and for those operating under China's Emissions Trading Scheme. Results are robust to IV-2SLS using emission permit allocation as an instrument, system-GMM, PSM-DiD, and eight additional specification checks. The findings provide empirical support for the Porter Hypothesis in the bio-manufacturing context and carry direct policy implications for the design of carbon trading mechanisms and green industry support programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13581,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Crops and Products","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 124529"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Crops and Products","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926669026019187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how carbon cost internalization (CCI) affects the financial performance of green bio-manufacturing enterprises, with particular attention to threshold nonlinearities and transmission mechanisms. Using a panel of 484 Chinese A-share bio-manufacturing firms from 2010 to 2023 (N = 6958 firm-year observations), we construct a five-component CCI index via principal component analysis and apply Hansen (1999) double-threshold regression to identify two critical turning points at CCI= 0.342 and CCI= 0.586. Regime-specific estimation reveals that the CCI-to-ROA coefficient rises monotonically across the three regimes: 0.028 in the low-internalization regime, 0.092 in the intermediate regime, and 0.148 in the high-internalization regime, indicating that financial returns to carbon cost absorption are superlinear rather than proportional. Bootstrap mediation analysis identifies four transmission channels: green technology innovation (29.5%), ESG performance improvement (21.6%), capital structure adjustment (15.9%), and supply chain decarbonization (11.6%), collectively explaining 78.6% of the total CCI effect on ROA. Moderation analysis confirms that the CCI-financial performance relationship is amplified for firms in high-carbon-intensity industries and for those operating under China's Emissions Trading Scheme. Results are robust to IV-2SLS using emission permit allocation as an instrument, system-GMM, PSM-DiD, and eight additional specification checks. The findings provide empirical support for the Porter Hypothesis in the bio-manufacturing context and carry direct policy implications for the design of carbon trading mechanisms and green industry support programs.
碳成本内部化对绿色生物制造企业财务绩效的门槛效应
本研究探讨了碳成本内部化(CCI)如何影响绿色生物制造企业的财务绩效,特别关注阈值非线性和传递机制。利用2010 - 2023年484家中国a股生物制药企业(N = 6958家企业年观测数据)的面板,我们通过主成分分析构建了一个五组分CCI指数,并应用Hansen(1999)双阈值回归确定了CCI= 0.342和CCI= 0.586的两个关键拐点。具体制度估计表明,cci - roa系数在三种制度下单调上升:低内部化制度下为0.028,中等内部化制度下为0.092,高内部化制度下为0.148,表明碳成本吸收的财务回报是超线性的,而不是成比例的。Bootstrap中介分析确定了四个传导渠道:绿色技术创新(29.5%)、ESG绩效改善(21.6%)、资本结构调整(15.9%)和供应链脱碳(11.6%),共同解释了78.6%的CCI对总ROA的影响。适度分析证实,在高碳强度行业和中国碳排放交易体系下运营的企业中,cci与财务绩效的关系被放大。使用排放许可分配作为工具、系统gmm、PSM-DiD和8个附加规格检查,结果对IV-2SLS具有鲁棒性。研究结果为生物制造业背景下的波特假说提供了实证支持,并为碳交易机制和绿色产业支持计划的设计提供了直接的政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Industrial Crops and Products
Industrial Crops and Products 农林科学-农业工程
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
1518
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Industrial Crops and Products is an International Journal publishing academic and industrial research on industrial (defined as non-food/non-feed) crops and products. Papers concern both crop-oriented and bio-based materials from crops-oriented research, and should be of interest to an international audience, hypothesis driven, and where comparisons are made statistics performed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书