Role of smart charging and vehicle-to-grid for long-term decarbonization pathways in Italy

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Pranav Deep Kumar, Matteo Giacomo Prina, Giuseppe Rotondo, Giampaolo Manzolini, Sonia Leva, Michela Longo, Wolfram Sparber
{"title":"Role of smart charging and vehicle-to-grid for long-term decarbonization pathways in Italy","authors":"Pranav Deep Kumar,&nbsp;Matteo Giacomo Prina,&nbsp;Giuseppe Rotondo,&nbsp;Giampaolo Manzolini,&nbsp;Sonia Leva,&nbsp;Michela Longo,&nbsp;Wolfram Sparber","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2026.105474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The electrification of transport will significantly increase electricity demand, potentially amplifying peak loads and infrastructure requirements if charging remains uncontrolled. Conversely, Electric Vehicles can provide distributed flexibility to support renewable integration and reduce system costs. This study develops a multi-node, multi-period capacity-expansion model using PyPSA, integrating detailed hourly EV mobility and availability profiles generated with emobpy. The charging scenarios are interpreted sequentially, with SC as the near-market, low-cost first stage and V2G carrying an explicit capital-cost premium for bidirectional infrastructure as an additional capability built on top of SC. Results indicate that coordinated charging significantly influences optimal investment pathways. At 30 % participation, SC reduces total annual system costs by 1.3 % by 2050 compared to Dumb charging, mainly through lower stationary battery deployment (10 % in 2050, and up to 92 % in earlier years) and reduced renewable curtailment (13 % in 2050, and up to 48 % in earlier years). Adding bidirectional capability on top of SC lowers the 2050 system cost by a further 2.0 % (141.0 versus 144.0 billion EUR, i.e., 3.3 % versus Dumb charging), while reducing stationary battery capacity by 39.7 % and renewable curtailment by 13.9 TWh relative to SC, as EV fleets substitute part of grid-scale storage and enhance renewable utilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 105474"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138826006600","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The electrification of transport will significantly increase electricity demand, potentially amplifying peak loads and infrastructure requirements if charging remains uncontrolled. Conversely, Electric Vehicles can provide distributed flexibility to support renewable integration and reduce system costs. This study develops a multi-node, multi-period capacity-expansion model using PyPSA, integrating detailed hourly EV mobility and availability profiles generated with emobpy. The charging scenarios are interpreted sequentially, with SC as the near-market, low-cost first stage and V2G carrying an explicit capital-cost premium for bidirectional infrastructure as an additional capability built on top of SC. Results indicate that coordinated charging significantly influences optimal investment pathways. At 30 % participation, SC reduces total annual system costs by 1.3 % by 2050 compared to Dumb charging, mainly through lower stationary battery deployment (10 % in 2050, and up to 92 % in earlier years) and reduced renewable curtailment (13 % in 2050, and up to 48 % in earlier years). Adding bidirectional capability on top of SC lowers the 2050 system cost by a further 2.0 % (141.0 versus 144.0 billion EUR, i.e., 3.3 % versus Dumb charging), while reducing stationary battery capacity by 39.7 % and renewable curtailment by 13.9 TWh relative to SC, as EV fleets substitute part of grid-scale storage and enhance renewable utilization.
智能充电和车辆到电网在意大利长期脱碳道路中的作用
交通电气化将显著增加电力需求,如果充电不受控制,可能会增加高峰负荷和基础设施需求。相反,电动汽车可以提供分布式灵活性,以支持可再生能源集成并降低系统成本。本研究利用PyPSA建立了一个多节点、多时段的容量扩张模型,整合了emobpy生成的详细的每小时电动汽车移动性和可用性概况。按顺序解释了充电方案,其中SC为接近市场的低成本第一阶段,V2G为双向基础设施提供明确的资本成本溢价,作为建立在SC之上的额外能力。研究结果表明,协调充电显著影响最优投资路径。在30% %的参与率下,到2050年,与哑充电相比,SC将每年的系统总成本降低1.3 %,主要是通过降低固定电池部署(2050年为10 %,早期为92 %)和减少可再生能源弃电(2050年为13 %,早期为48 %)。在SC上增加双向能力,2050年系统成本将进一步降低2.0 % (141.0 vs 1440亿欧元,即3.3 % vs哑充电),同时相对于SC,固定电池容量减少39.7% %,可再生能源弃电减少13.9太瓦时,因为电动汽车取代了部分电网规模的存储并提高了可再生能源的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书