Cultural Authority and Food Choices: How Intergenerational Power Shapes Maternal Diet in Rural South Africa

IF 4.2 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Current Developments in Nutrition Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.cdnut.2026.109542
Praveenkumar Aivalli, Livhuwani Muthelo, Mxolisi Welcome Ngwenya, Frank Adusei-Mensah, Mabitsela Hezekiel Mphasha, Samuel Akinseinde, Joke-Folu Badejo, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, Catherine M Phillips
{"title":"Cultural Authority and Food Choices: How Intergenerational Power Shapes Maternal Diet in Rural South Africa","authors":"Praveenkumar Aivalli,&nbsp;Livhuwani Muthelo,&nbsp;Mxolisi Welcome Ngwenya,&nbsp;Frank Adusei-Mensah,&nbsp;Mabitsela Hezekiel Mphasha,&nbsp;Samuel Akinseinde,&nbsp;Joke-Folu Badejo,&nbsp;Fionnuala M McAuliffe,&nbsp;Catherine M Phillips","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2026.109542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Maternal malnutrition remains a persistent public health challenge in South Africa, affecting both maternal and child health outcomes. Dietary practices during pregnancy and lactation are shaped by complex social dynamics that extend beyond individual choice.</div></div><div>Maternal malnutrition remains a persistent public health challenge in South Africa, affecting both maternal and child health outcomes. Dietary practices during pregnancy and lactation are shaped by complex social dynamics that extend beyond individual choice.</div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study explored maternal dietary practices during pregnancy, defined as the foods women reported consuming, avoiding, substituting, or concealing, and examined how cultural norms and intergenerational power relations influenced these practices within the context of routine antenatal nutrition counseling.</div></div><div>This study explored maternal dietary practices during pregnancy, defined as the foods women reported consuming, avoiding, substituting, or concealing, and examined how cultural norms and intergenerational power relations influenced these practices within the context of routine antenatal nutrition counseling.</div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a qualitative study in Capricorn district of Limpopo province (March–October 2025). Data comprised focus group discussions (<em>n</em> = 22) and individual interviews (<em>n</em> = 13) with 150 participants including pregnant women, grandmothers, fathers, community leaders, community health workers, mother mentors (lay peer counselors attached to clinics who support pregnant women and new mothers), and healthcare providers. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Interpretation drew on the Social Ecological Model and Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice.</div></div><div>We conducted a qualitative study in Capricorn district of Limpopo province (March–October 2025). Data comprised focus group discussions (<em>n</em> = 22) and individual interviews (<em>n</em> = 13) with 150 participants including pregnant women, grandmothers, fathers, community leaders, community health workers, mother mentors (lay peer counselors attached to clinics who support pregnant women and new mothers), and healthcare providers. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Interpretation drew on the Social Ecological Model and Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice.</div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four interconnected themes explained dietary behavior. First, elder women, especially grandmothers and mothers-in-law, held decisive authority based on experiential knowledge framed as care, which often was accepted over healthcare advice. Second, pregnant women balanced competing guidance, using respectful deference in public and selective adherence in private. Third, poverty, distance, and poor infrastructure made clinical advice largely unattainable. Fourth, digital messaging and peer networks provided supplementary information that supported dialog but did not displace elder authority.</div></div><div>Four interconnected themes explained dietary behavior. First, elder women, especially grandmothers and mothers-in-law, held decisive authority based on experiential knowledge framed as care, which often was accepted over healthcare advice. Second, pregnant women balanced competing guidance, using respectful deference in public and selective adherence in private. Third, poverty, distance, and poor infrastructure made clinical advice largely unattainable. Fourth, digital messaging and peer networks provided supplementary information that supported dialog but did not displace elder authority.</div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Reported maternal dietary practice is shaped by intergenerational power dynamics and by resource constraints rather than by nutritional knowledge alone. Grandmothers enforce cultural dietary restrictions that conflict with clinical guidance, whereas pregnant women use public deference and private adaptation to navigate competing advice. Nutrition interventions must engage elders as partners and employ culturally respectful harm-reduction strategies.</div></div><div>Reported maternal dietary practice is shaped by intergenerational power dynamics and by resource constraints rather than by nutritional knowledge alone. Grandmothers enforce cultural dietary restrictions that conflict with clinical guidance, whereas pregnant women use public deference and private adaptation to navigate competing advice. Nutrition interventions must engage elders as partners and employ culturally respectful harm-reduction strategies.</div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"10 10","pages":"Article 109542"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299126019074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Maternal malnutrition remains a persistent public health challenge in South Africa, affecting both maternal and child health outcomes. Dietary practices during pregnancy and lactation are shaped by complex social dynamics that extend beyond individual choice.
Maternal malnutrition remains a persistent public health challenge in South Africa, affecting both maternal and child health outcomes. Dietary practices during pregnancy and lactation are shaped by complex social dynamics that extend beyond individual choice.

Objectives

This study explored maternal dietary practices during pregnancy, defined as the foods women reported consuming, avoiding, substituting, or concealing, and examined how cultural norms and intergenerational power relations influenced these practices within the context of routine antenatal nutrition counseling.
This study explored maternal dietary practices during pregnancy, defined as the foods women reported consuming, avoiding, substituting, or concealing, and examined how cultural norms and intergenerational power relations influenced these practices within the context of routine antenatal nutrition counseling.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study in Capricorn district of Limpopo province (March–October 2025). Data comprised focus group discussions (n = 22) and individual interviews (n = 13) with 150 participants including pregnant women, grandmothers, fathers, community leaders, community health workers, mother mentors (lay peer counselors attached to clinics who support pregnant women and new mothers), and healthcare providers. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Interpretation drew on the Social Ecological Model and Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice.
We conducted a qualitative study in Capricorn district of Limpopo province (March–October 2025). Data comprised focus group discussions (n = 22) and individual interviews (n = 13) with 150 participants including pregnant women, grandmothers, fathers, community leaders, community health workers, mother mentors (lay peer counselors attached to clinics who support pregnant women and new mothers), and healthcare providers. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Interpretation drew on the Social Ecological Model and Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice.

Results

Four interconnected themes explained dietary behavior. First, elder women, especially grandmothers and mothers-in-law, held decisive authority based on experiential knowledge framed as care, which often was accepted over healthcare advice. Second, pregnant women balanced competing guidance, using respectful deference in public and selective adherence in private. Third, poverty, distance, and poor infrastructure made clinical advice largely unattainable. Fourth, digital messaging and peer networks provided supplementary information that supported dialog but did not displace elder authority.
Four interconnected themes explained dietary behavior. First, elder women, especially grandmothers and mothers-in-law, held decisive authority based on experiential knowledge framed as care, which often was accepted over healthcare advice. Second, pregnant women balanced competing guidance, using respectful deference in public and selective adherence in private. Third, poverty, distance, and poor infrastructure made clinical advice largely unattainable. Fourth, digital messaging and peer networks provided supplementary information that supported dialog but did not displace elder authority.

Conclusions

Reported maternal dietary practice is shaped by intergenerational power dynamics and by resource constraints rather than by nutritional knowledge alone. Grandmothers enforce cultural dietary restrictions that conflict with clinical guidance, whereas pregnant women use public deference and private adaptation to navigate competing advice. Nutrition interventions must engage elders as partners and employ culturally respectful harm-reduction strategies.
Reported maternal dietary practice is shaped by intergenerational power dynamics and by resource constraints rather than by nutritional knowledge alone. Grandmothers enforce cultural dietary restrictions that conflict with clinical guidance, whereas pregnant women use public deference and private adaptation to navigate competing advice. Nutrition interventions must engage elders as partners and employ culturally respectful harm-reduction strategies.
文化权威和食物选择:代际力量如何塑造南非农村母亲的饮食
在南非,孕产妇营养不良仍然是一个持续存在的公共卫生挑战,影响着孕产妇和儿童的健康结果。孕期和哺乳期的饮食习惯受到复杂的社会动态的影响,超出了个人的选择。在南非,孕产妇营养不良仍然是一个持续存在的公共卫生挑战,影响到孕产妇和儿童的健康结果。孕期和哺乳期的饮食习惯受到复杂的社会动态的影响,超出了个人的选择。目的:本研究探讨孕妇在怀孕期间的饮食习惯,定义为妇女报告的食用、避免、替代或隐瞒的食物,并在常规产前营养咨询的背景下研究文化规范和代际权力关系如何影响这些习惯。本研究探讨了孕妇在怀孕期间的饮食习惯,定义为妇女报告的食用、避免、替代或隐瞒的食物,并研究了文化规范和代际权力关系如何在常规产前营养咨询的背景下影响这些习惯。方法于2025年3月- 10月在林波波省摩羯座区进行定性研究。数据包括焦点小组讨论(n = 22)和个人访谈(n = 13),共有150名参与者,包括孕妇、祖母、父亲、社区领导人、社区卫生工作者、母亲导师(附属于支持孕妇和新妈妈的诊所的非专业同伴咨询师)和医疗保健提供者。数据分析采用反身性主题分析。解释借鉴了社会生态模型和布迪厄的实践理论。我们在林波波省摩羯座区进行了定性研究(2025年3月至10月)。数据包括焦点小组讨论(n = 22)和个人访谈(n = 13),共有150名参与者,包括孕妇、祖母、父亲、社区领导人、社区卫生工作者、母亲导师(附属于支持孕妇和新妈妈的诊所的非专业同伴咨询师)和医疗保健提供者。数据分析采用反身性主题分析。解释借鉴了社会生态模型和布迪厄的实践理论。结果四个相互关联的主题解释了饮食行为。首先,老年妇女,尤其是祖母和岳母,根据作为护理的经验知识拥有决定性的权威,这往往比医疗建议更被接受。其次,孕妇平衡了竞争性指导,在公开场合使用恭敬的顺从,在私下使用选择性的遵守。第三,贫困、距离遥远和基础设施落后使得临床咨询基本上无法获得。第四,数字信息和对等网络提供了支持对话的补充信息,但没有取代长辈的权威。四个相互关联的主题解释了饮食行为。首先,老年妇女,尤其是祖母和岳母,根据作为护理的经验知识拥有决定性的权威,这往往比医疗建议更被接受。其次,孕妇平衡了竞争性指导,在公开场合使用恭敬的顺从,在私下使用选择性的遵守。第三,贫困、距离遥远和基础设施落后使得临床咨询基本上无法获得。第四,数字信息和对等网络提供了支持对话的补充信息,但没有取代长辈的权威。结论报告的母亲饮食习惯受代际权力动态和资源限制的影响,而不仅仅是营养知识。祖母们强制执行与临床指导相冲突的文化饮食限制,而孕妇则利用公开的顺从和私人的适应来应对相互竞争的建议。营养干预措施必须让老年人成为合作伙伴,并采用尊重文化的减少危害战略。据报道,母亲的饮食习惯受到代际权力动态和资源限制的影响,而不仅仅是营养知识。祖母们强制执行与临床指导相冲突的文化饮食限制,而孕妇则利用公开的顺从和私人的适应来应对相互竞争的建议。营养干预措施必须让老年人成为合作伙伴,并采用尊重文化的减少危害战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Developments in Nutrition
Current Developments in Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书