AI hallucinations and user verification intentions: an integrative model based on the DeLone and McLean model and the theory of planned behavior

IF 9.9 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Telematics and Informatics Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2026.102467
Bo Hu, Yu-li Liu, Jiayue Dai, Jiayi Mi
{"title":"AI hallucinations and user verification intentions: an integrative model based on the DeLone and McLean model and the theory of planned behavior","authors":"Bo Hu,&nbsp;Yu-li Liu,&nbsp;Jiayue Dai,&nbsp;Jiayi Mi","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2026.102467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has become deeply integrated into everyday life and has increasingly become a key source of information. However, the prevalence of AI hallucinations, which refer to instances in which AI systems generate inaccurate or misleading information, raises concerns about the quality and reliability of the responses. Drawing on the Information Systems Success Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this study examines the factors that influence users' intentions to verify information generated by GenAI. An online survey was conducted among 620 Chinese participants. The findings based on structural equation modeling analysis reveal that system quality, information quality, and service quality positively influence perceived credibility, which in turn reduces perceptions of AI hallucination potential. Perceived hallucination potential further promotes a favorable attitude toward information verification. Consistent with the TPB, verification intention is significantly affected by attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control. This study extends the literature on AI hallucinations and information verification by identifying the mechanisms through which quality perceptions and credibility shape users' verification intentions. Theoretical implications and practical recommendations are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102467"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585326001036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has become deeply integrated into everyday life and has increasingly become a key source of information. However, the prevalence of AI hallucinations, which refer to instances in which AI systems generate inaccurate or misleading information, raises concerns about the quality and reliability of the responses. Drawing on the Information Systems Success Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this study examines the factors that influence users' intentions to verify information generated by GenAI. An online survey was conducted among 620 Chinese participants. The findings based on structural equation modeling analysis reveal that system quality, information quality, and service quality positively influence perceived credibility, which in turn reduces perceptions of AI hallucination potential. Perceived hallucination potential further promotes a favorable attitude toward information verification. Consistent with the TPB, verification intention is significantly affected by attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control. This study extends the literature on AI hallucinations and information verification by identifying the mechanisms through which quality perceptions and credibility shape users' verification intentions. Theoretical implications and practical recommendations are discussed.
人工智能幻觉与用户验证意图:基于DeLone和McLean模型与计划行为理论的整合模型
生成式人工智能(GenAI)已经深入融入日常生活,并日益成为信息的重要来源。然而,人工智能幻觉的流行,指的是人工智能系统产生不准确或误导性信息的情况,引发了对反应质量和可靠性的担忧。利用信息系统成功模型和计划行为理论(TPB),本研究考察了影响用户验证GenAI生成的信息意图的因素。一项在线调查在620名中国参与者中进行。基于结构方程模型分析的研究结果表明,系统质量、信息质量和服务质量正向影响感知可信度,进而降低对人工智能幻觉潜力的感知。感知幻觉潜能进一步促进了对信息验证的有利态度。与TPB一致,验证意向受态度、主观规范和感知行为控制的显著影响。本研究通过确定质量感知和可信度塑造用户验证意图的机制,扩展了关于人工智能幻觉和信息验证的文献。讨论了理论意义和实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书