Being perfectly seen: Affective capture, relational risk, and the Autopticon effect in AI companion systems

IF 9.9 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Shiyi Zhang, Shiyu (Sharon) Zheng
{"title":"Being perfectly seen: Affective capture, relational risk, and the Autopticon effect in AI companion systems","authors":"Shiyi Zhang,&nbsp;Shiyu (Sharon) Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2026.102461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid integration of conversational artificial intelligence into everyday life has made AI companion systems both widely used and the focus of increasing concern, particularly following publicly documented self-harm tragedies associated with intensive use of platforms such as ChatGPT and Character.AI. This article examines three such cases through a critical multi-case study, combining thematic analysis of Reddit discourse with critical discourse analysis of human-AI dialogue excerpts drawn from legal complaints and reputable news reporting. Treating the cases as extreme rather than representative, the study identifies affective capture as a relational mechanism through which engagement-oriented AI companion systems may intensify disclosure, dependency, and vulnerability. This mechanism operates through three analytically distinct but mutually reinforcing processes: engineered anthropomorphism, sycophantic validation, and persistent memory. To theorize this dynamic, the article develops the concept of the Autopticon, a mid-range concept describing subordination through the promise of being directly and intensely witnessed by a responsive artificial interlocutor. Whereas the Panopticon disciplines through the threat of being watched, the Autopticon captures through the seductive offer of perfect recognition. The article argues that AI companion risk cannot be addressed through content-level guardrails alone because the relevant harm is relational, cumulative, and embedded in engagement-oriented design. It contributes to digital technology and society research by reframing AI companion safety as a problem of how the continuing user-system relationship is designed and by proposing mechanism-specific design and governance safeguards for platforms that mediate intimate human-AI interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102461"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585326000973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid integration of conversational artificial intelligence into everyday life has made AI companion systems both widely used and the focus of increasing concern, particularly following publicly documented self-harm tragedies associated with intensive use of platforms such as ChatGPT and Character.AI. This article examines three such cases through a critical multi-case study, combining thematic analysis of Reddit discourse with critical discourse analysis of human-AI dialogue excerpts drawn from legal complaints and reputable news reporting. Treating the cases as extreme rather than representative, the study identifies affective capture as a relational mechanism through which engagement-oriented AI companion systems may intensify disclosure, dependency, and vulnerability. This mechanism operates through three analytically distinct but mutually reinforcing processes: engineered anthropomorphism, sycophantic validation, and persistent memory. To theorize this dynamic, the article develops the concept of the Autopticon, a mid-range concept describing subordination through the promise of being directly and intensely witnessed by a responsive artificial interlocutor. Whereas the Panopticon disciplines through the threat of being watched, the Autopticon captures through the seductive offer of perfect recognition. The article argues that AI companion risk cannot be addressed through content-level guardrails alone because the relevant harm is relational, cumulative, and embedded in engagement-oriented design. It contributes to digital technology and society research by reframing AI companion safety as a problem of how the continuing user-system relationship is designed and by proposing mechanism-specific design and governance safeguards for platforms that mediate intimate human-AI interaction.
被完美地看到:情感捕获,关系风险,以及人工智能伴侣系统中的Autopticon效应
对话式人工智能与日常生活的快速融合,使得人工智能伴侣系统得到了广泛的应用,也越来越受到关注,尤其是在大量使用ChatGPT和Character.AI等平台引发的自残悲剧公开记录之后。本文通过批判性多案例研究考察了三个这样的案例,将Reddit话语的主题分析与人类与人工智能对话的批判性话语分析结合起来,这些对话摘录自法律投诉和知名新闻报道。该研究将这些案例视为极端而非代表性,将情感捕获确定为一种关系机制,通过这种机制,面向参与的人工智能伴侣系统可能会加剧信息披露、依赖性和脆弱性。这种机制通过三个分析上不同但相互加强的过程来运作:工程拟人化、谄媚验证和持久记忆。为了将这种动态理论化,本文发展了自动对话的概念,这是一个中程概念,描述了通过承诺被一个反应灵敏的人工对话者直接和强烈地见证的从属关系。圆形监狱通过被监视的威胁来训练,而自动监狱通过提供完美识别的诱惑来捕获。这篇文章认为,人工智能伴随风险不能仅仅通过内容级别的护栏来解决,因为相关的伤害是相关的、累积的,并且嵌入在面向参与的设计中。它通过将人工智能伴侣安全重新定义为如何设计持续的用户系统关系的问题,并为调解人类与人工智能亲密互动的平台提出特定于机制的设计和治理保障措施,为数字技术和社会研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书