{"title":"Elucidating the distinct mechanisms of Er and Y in elevating the creep resistance of Al-Cu-Mg alloys","authors":"Chuanhai Li, Zhimin Mo, Guihao Sun, Yuxiu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.matchar.2026.117136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effects of Er and Y microalloying on the creep behavior of Al-Cu-Mg alloys were comparatively investigated in this work. Three T6-treated alloys, including Al-4Cu-0.25 Mg (as-received alloy), Al-4Cu-0.25 Mg-0.1Er (Er-modified alloy) and Al-4Cu-0.25 Mg-0.1Y (Y-modified alloy), were crept at 270 °C under applied stresses ranging from 100 MPa to 120 MPa. Both Er and Y significantly reduced the steady creep rate, with the Er-modified alloy exhibiting the greatest creep resistance, followed by the Y-modified alloy and then the as-received alloy. Microstructural analysis revealed that θ’-Al<sub>2</sub>Cu and S′-Al<sub>2</sub>CuMg precipitates significantly coarsened during creep, but the coarsening degree depended on alloy composition. Specifically, the Er-modified alloy exhibited the lowest coarsening rate, which was attributed to local Er enrichment at precipitates. The retained fine precipitates effectively hindered dislocation motion and sub-grain boundary migration, which contributed to the reduced steady creep rate. In contrast, Y was predominantly distributed in the Al matrix and offered inferior suppression of precipitate coarsening compared with Er. Thus, segregation strengthening is more conducive than solution strengthening, and Er microalloying is a more effective choice than Y for enhancing the high-temperature creep resistance of Al-Cu-Mg alloys.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18727,"journal":{"name":"Materials Characterization","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 117136"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044580326011745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The effects of Er and Y microalloying on the creep behavior of Al-Cu-Mg alloys were comparatively investigated in this work. Three T6-treated alloys, including Al-4Cu-0.25 Mg (as-received alloy), Al-4Cu-0.25 Mg-0.1Er (Er-modified alloy) and Al-4Cu-0.25 Mg-0.1Y (Y-modified alloy), were crept at 270 °C under applied stresses ranging from 100 MPa to 120 MPa. Both Er and Y significantly reduced the steady creep rate, with the Er-modified alloy exhibiting the greatest creep resistance, followed by the Y-modified alloy and then the as-received alloy. Microstructural analysis revealed that θ’-Al2Cu and S′-Al2CuMg precipitates significantly coarsened during creep, but the coarsening degree depended on alloy composition. Specifically, the Er-modified alloy exhibited the lowest coarsening rate, which was attributed to local Er enrichment at precipitates. The retained fine precipitates effectively hindered dislocation motion and sub-grain boundary migration, which contributed to the reduced steady creep rate. In contrast, Y was predominantly distributed in the Al matrix and offered inferior suppression of precipitate coarsening compared with Er. Thus, segregation strengthening is more conducive than solution strengthening, and Er microalloying is a more effective choice than Y for enhancing the high-temperature creep resistance of Al-Cu-Mg alloys.
期刊介绍:
Materials Characterization features original articles and state-of-the-art reviews on theoretical and practical aspects of the structure and behaviour of materials.
The Journal focuses on all characterization techniques, including all forms of microscopy (light, electron, acoustic, etc.,) and analysis (especially microanalysis and surface analytical techniques). Developments in both this wide range of techniques and their application to the quantification of the microstructure of materials are essential facets of the Journal.
The Journal provides the Materials Scientist/Engineer with up-to-date information on many types of materials with an underlying theme of explaining the behavior of materials using novel approaches. Materials covered by the journal include:
Metals & Alloys
Ceramics
Nanomaterials
Biomedical materials
Optical materials
Composites
Natural Materials.