Meghan Lambie, Aakshi Puri, Rita Gill, Ariana Rostami, Maria Kondratyev, Bradly G Wouters, Laurie Ailles, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Scott V Bratman
{"title":"CDK4/6 inhibition radiosensitizes p16-negative squamous cell carcinomas of the aerodigestive tract via cell cycle arrest.","authors":"Meghan Lambie, Aakshi Puri, Rita Gill, Ariana Rostami, Maria Kondratyev, Bradly G Wouters, Laurie Ailles, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Scott V Bratman","doi":"10.1080/09553002.2026.2739263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>CDK4/6 inhibitors have quickly entered clinical guidelines for luminal breast cancer, but their role in other cancer types remains to be defined. Squamous cell carcinomas not driven by human papillomavirus (HPV-negative SCCs) are frequently treated with radiotherapy, and concurrent treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors has been proposed. We sought to investigate the efficacy of this combination across a range of HPV-negative SCCs and define molecular biomarkers of response that could be used for treatment selection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We employed clonogenic assays and a previously described long-term viability assay for measuring radiation response to identify radioresistant cells within HPV-negative SCC cell lines. Among consistently radioresistant lines, we conducted drug/radiation combinations to measure additive effects of the CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib and palbociclib. Mechanistic effects of drug/radiation combinations were further investigated by flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry, and western blot. Efficacy was validated in vivo using an HPV-negative SCC cell line xenograft.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 19 HPV-negative SCC cell lines, 6 were consistently radioresistant using both clonogenic and viability assays. We validated the use of the viability assay for drug/radiation combinations using known radiosensitizing drug, cisplatin, before applying it to the CDK4/6 inhibitors. Five of the 6 radioresistant cell lines displayed a favorable combination effect with both CDK4/6 inhibitors. Sensitivity to the combination was reliant on drug-induced cell cycle arrest and correlated with lack of p16 activity in the presence of Rb. Combining abemaciclib with radiation reduced tumor growth in xenografted mice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CDK4/6 inhibitors are good candidates for further preclinical and clinical evaluation in combination with radiation in HPV-negative SCCs due to their effects on cell cycle phase in cells with Rb protein activity and low p16 levels. The long-term viability assay allows for efficient testing of drug/radiation combinations and can be considered for future experiments as part of a bench-to-bedside translational pipeline.</p>","PeriodicalId":94057,"journal":{"name":"International journal of radiation biology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of radiation biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2026.2739263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: CDK4/6 inhibitors have quickly entered clinical guidelines for luminal breast cancer, but their role in other cancer types remains to be defined. Squamous cell carcinomas not driven by human papillomavirus (HPV-negative SCCs) are frequently treated with radiotherapy, and concurrent treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors has been proposed. We sought to investigate the efficacy of this combination across a range of HPV-negative SCCs and define molecular biomarkers of response that could be used for treatment selection.
Materials and methods: We employed clonogenic assays and a previously described long-term viability assay for measuring radiation response to identify radioresistant cells within HPV-negative SCC cell lines. Among consistently radioresistant lines, we conducted drug/radiation combinations to measure additive effects of the CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib and palbociclib. Mechanistic effects of drug/radiation combinations were further investigated by flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry, and western blot. Efficacy was validated in vivo using an HPV-negative SCC cell line xenograft.
Results: Among the 19 HPV-negative SCC cell lines, 6 were consistently radioresistant using both clonogenic and viability assays. We validated the use of the viability assay for drug/radiation combinations using known radiosensitizing drug, cisplatin, before applying it to the CDK4/6 inhibitors. Five of the 6 radioresistant cell lines displayed a favorable combination effect with both CDK4/6 inhibitors. Sensitivity to the combination was reliant on drug-induced cell cycle arrest and correlated with lack of p16 activity in the presence of Rb. Combining abemaciclib with radiation reduced tumor growth in xenografted mice.
Conclusions: CDK4/6 inhibitors are good candidates for further preclinical and clinical evaluation in combination with radiation in HPV-negative SCCs due to their effects on cell cycle phase in cells with Rb protein activity and low p16 levels. The long-term viability assay allows for efficient testing of drug/radiation combinations and can be considered for future experiments as part of a bench-to-bedside translational pipeline.