Between borders and barriers: disability prevalence, pregnancy outcomes and maternal care access on the Thai-Myanmar border, a mixed methods study.

IF 2.4 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2026.1919504
Qin van de Stadt, Taco Jan Prins, Suphak Nosten, Mupawjay Pimanpanarak, May Myo Thwin, Ko Ko Aung, May Mon Mon Theint, Aung Myat Min, Mary Ellen Gilder, Nay Win Tun, Dirk Essink, Chaisiri Angkurawaranon, Rose McGready
{"title":"Between borders and barriers: disability prevalence, pregnancy outcomes and maternal care access on the Thai-Myanmar border, a mixed methods study.","authors":"Qin van de Stadt, Taco Jan Prins, Suphak Nosten, Mupawjay Pimanpanarak, May Myo Thwin, Ko Ko Aung, May Mon Mon Theint, Aung Myat Min, Mary Ellen Gilder, Nay Win Tun, Dirk Essink, Chaisiri Angkurawaranon, Rose McGready","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2026.1919504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research on the intersection of displacement, disability, and pregnancy remains scarce globally. At the Thai-Myanmar border tens of thousands of displaced individuals including over 12,000 refugees with documented disabilities reside. The objective of this analysis is to assess the prevalence of pregnant People With Disabilities (PWD) among displaced populations and to explore perspectives on disability and barriers to accessing maternal care in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study included a retrospective analysis of 49,038 clinical records of refugees and migrants who gave birth or received antenatal care at clinics operated by the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit. Logistic regression was used to compare pregnancy outcomes between pregnant people with and without disabilities. The qualitative component included five in-depth interviews with migrant PWD and five focus group discussions with healthcare staff and migrant community health volunteers providing maternal care. Deductive and inductive thematic analyses were conducted to examine experiences of accessing, receiving, and providing care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Documented prevalence of pregnant PWD was low at 0.62% (305/49,038; 95% CI 0.55-0.70). Women with disabilities reported barriers including stigma, transportation difficulties, financial constraints, and reliance on accompaniment to attend clinics. Those who accessed care described respectful communication and supportive interactions with staff. Healthcare providers expressed strong commitment to equitable care. Quantitative findings included higher antenatal care attendance and lower loss to follow-up among women with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The low documented prevalence of disability may reflect underrepresentation or underreporting of pregnant PWD in maternal services or a healthy migrant effect. Quantitative results reported favourable ANC use and perinatal outcomes, which aligned with accounts of respectful communication, equal treatment, and participation in decision-making. Future research should use standard tools, disaggregate findings by disability type, severity, and ethnicity to uncover specific needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1919504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2026.1919504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Research on the intersection of displacement, disability, and pregnancy remains scarce globally. At the Thai-Myanmar border tens of thousands of displaced individuals including over 12,000 refugees with documented disabilities reside. The objective of this analysis is to assess the prevalence of pregnant People With Disabilities (PWD) among displaced populations and to explore perspectives on disability and barriers to accessing maternal care in this setting.

Methods: This mixed-methods study included a retrospective analysis of 49,038 clinical records of refugees and migrants who gave birth or received antenatal care at clinics operated by the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit. Logistic regression was used to compare pregnancy outcomes between pregnant people with and without disabilities. The qualitative component included five in-depth interviews with migrant PWD and five focus group discussions with healthcare staff and migrant community health volunteers providing maternal care. Deductive and inductive thematic analyses were conducted to examine experiences of accessing, receiving, and providing care.

Results: Documented prevalence of pregnant PWD was low at 0.62% (305/49,038; 95% CI 0.55-0.70). Women with disabilities reported barriers including stigma, transportation difficulties, financial constraints, and reliance on accompaniment to attend clinics. Those who accessed care described respectful communication and supportive interactions with staff. Healthcare providers expressed strong commitment to equitable care. Quantitative findings included higher antenatal care attendance and lower loss to follow-up among women with disabilities.

Discussion: The low documented prevalence of disability may reflect underrepresentation or underreporting of pregnant PWD in maternal services or a healthy migrant effect. Quantitative results reported favourable ANC use and perinatal outcomes, which aligned with accounts of respectful communication, equal treatment, and participation in decision-making. Future research should use standard tools, disaggregate findings by disability type, severity, and ethnicity to uncover specific needs.

边界与障碍之间:泰缅边境残疾率、妊娠结局和孕产妇保健获取,一项混合方法研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书