Evaluation of the BioFire joint infection panel in Taiwan: Impact of regional non-target pathogens and joint type on its performance.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Shih-Hao Lo, Chieh Chin, Hsuan-Ti Huang, Cheng-Jung Ho, Yu-Te Tsai, Po-Liang Lu, Chao-Ju Chen, Shin-Huei Kuo, Shang-Yi Lin
{"title":"Evaluation of the BioFire joint infection panel in Taiwan: Impact of regional non-target pathogens and joint type on its performance.","authors":"Shih-Hao Lo, Chieh Chin, Hsuan-Ti Huang, Cheng-Jung Ho, Yu-Te Tsai, Po-Liang Lu, Chao-Ju Chen, Shin-Huei Kuo, Shang-Yi Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2026.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The BIOFIRE® Joint Infection (BJI) panel, a rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay, is used to diagnose joint infections. Here we used it to evaluate the clinical performance and impact of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) detection in Taiwan's unique microbial landscape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with suspected septic arthritis or prosthetic joint infection were prospectively enrolled from four hospitals in southern Taiwan. Synovial fluid specimens were tested using a BJI panel and routine bacterial culturing. Performance was assessed by calculating the positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement (PPA and NPA, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six specimens (native joints, 56; prosthetic joints, 30) were analyzed. The overall PPA and NPA were 92.3% and 76.7%, respectively. Native joints showed higher concordance (PPA, 93.8%; NPA, 85.0%) than prosthetic joints (PPA, 90.0%; NPA, 60.0%). The BJI panel detected pathogens in 14 culture-negative cases, predominantly among patients who previously received antibiotics. Notably, the panel identified six methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cases (three culture-negative) and one bla<sub>CTX-M</sub>-positive E. coli detection. However, three culture-positive cases involving \"off-panel\" regional pathogens (Burkholderia pseudomallei, n = 2; Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, n = 1) were BJI-negative. Diagnostic concordance is better in native joints and correlated significantly with higher synovial leukocyte counts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our evaluation revealed the BJI panel's ability to rapidly identify pathogens and profile AMR, with additional diagnostic yield particularly in culture-negative prosthetic joint infections and in patients with prior antibiotic exposure. However, its limited detection targets leave a diagnostic gap for regionally endemic pathogens such as Burkholderia pseudomallei and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, indicating the continued need for conventional culturing.</p>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2026.10.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The BIOFIRE® Joint Infection (BJI) panel, a rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay, is used to diagnose joint infections. Here we used it to evaluate the clinical performance and impact of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) detection in Taiwan's unique microbial landscape.

Methods: Adult patients with suspected septic arthritis or prosthetic joint infection were prospectively enrolled from four hospitals in southern Taiwan. Synovial fluid specimens were tested using a BJI panel and routine bacterial culturing. Performance was assessed by calculating the positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement (PPA and NPA, respectively).

Results: Eighty-six specimens (native joints, 56; prosthetic joints, 30) were analyzed. The overall PPA and NPA were 92.3% and 76.7%, respectively. Native joints showed higher concordance (PPA, 93.8%; NPA, 85.0%) than prosthetic joints (PPA, 90.0%; NPA, 60.0%). The BJI panel detected pathogens in 14 culture-negative cases, predominantly among patients who previously received antibiotics. Notably, the panel identified six methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cases (three culture-negative) and one blaCTX-M-positive E. coli detection. However, three culture-positive cases involving "off-panel" regional pathogens (Burkholderia pseudomallei, n = 2; Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, n = 1) were BJI-negative. Diagnostic concordance is better in native joints and correlated significantly with higher synovial leukocyte counts.

Conclusions: Our evaluation revealed the BJI panel's ability to rapidly identify pathogens and profile AMR, with additional diagnostic yield particularly in culture-negative prosthetic joint infections and in patients with prior antibiotic exposure. However, its limited detection targets leave a diagnostic gap for regionally endemic pathogens such as Burkholderia pseudomallei and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, indicating the continued need for conventional culturing.

台湾BioFire联合感染面板的评估:区域非目标病原体和关节类型对其性能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书