Early-Life Policies and the Prevention of Multiple Long-Term Conditions: Findings From a Stakeholder Workshop Developed Collaboratively With Public Contributors

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sebastian Stannard, Nida Ziauddeen, Robin Poole, I. Cook, Emilia Holland, Erin Panes, Reet Nagra, Jack Welch, Simon DS Fraser, Nireen A Alwan
{"title":"Early-Life Policies and the Prevention of Multiple Long-Term Conditions: Findings From a Stakeholder Workshop Developed Collaboratively With Public Contributors","authors":"Sebastian Stannard,&nbsp;Nida Ziauddeen,&nbsp;Robin Poole,&nbsp;I. Cook,&nbsp;Emilia Holland,&nbsp;Erin Panes,&nbsp;Reet Nagra,&nbsp;Jack Welch,&nbsp;Simon DS Fraser,&nbsp;Nireen A Alwan","doi":"10.1111/hex.70928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The multidisciplinary ecosystem to study life course determinants and prevention of early-onset burdensome multimorbidity (MELD-B) project examined early-life factors that contribute to the risk of developing multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) in adulthood. Insights from an initial stakeholder workshop shaped the project's direction and priorities. To continue this collaborative approach, we developed a second workshop with public contributors to reflect on how our research aligns with current early-life policies. We defined these as policies that support children and their families at an early stage to mitigate risk factors and strengthen protective factors for health and wellbeing across the life course, thereby reducing the risk of MLTC later in life. The workshop explored challenges facing children and young people within the system, considered practical applications of the research findings and identified priorities for future research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The research team worked with three public contributors (one adult member of the MELD-B Advisory Group and two young researchers) to develop the workshop in terms of its questions, structure and format. Stakeholders were divided into three mixed-background groups, each facilitated by two team members, and discussions centred on predefined questions. Padlet (an online whiteboard) was used to collate ideas. Themes from the breakout rooms and full group discussions were initially identified with the aid of AI (Institutional account of Microsoft Copilot).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen stakeholders from backgrounds including health visiting (<i>n</i> = 2), charities (<i>n</i> = 1), academics (<i>n</i> = 3), healthcare practitioners (<i>n</i> = 5) and council employees (<i>n</i> = 4), attended the workshop. Stakeholders emphasised that wider systems and environments shape child and family outcomes, with poverty and socioeconomic inequality acting as major upstream drivers. Stakeholders noted that gaps in data, fragmented information systems and poor linkage hinder informed decision-making, while short-term political and budget cycles, workforce pressures, insufficient funding and implementation challenges reduce the impact of early-years policies. Stakeholders agreed that the early years are the most critical period for effective action and require coordinated, cross-sector, whole-system approaches. Stakeholders highlighted the need for research to be translated into clear, actionable guidance, and stressed the importance of participatory engagement, clear communication and relational ways of working.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our workshop identified key barriers to early-life policies as well as areas of best practice to guide future action.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>A public contributor who is a member of the MELD-B PPI Advisory Group and two young researchers from NxtGen, a young researcher training programme at the University of Southampton, were actively involved throughout the development and delivery of the workshop. They helped identify stakeholders to invite, developed the workshop agenda and contributed to the design of presentation materials. Their input shaped how key messages were communicated, helping to ensure that these were engaging, accessible and aligned with policies relevant to young people identified through previous NxtGen research. They also advised on the choice of interactive tools, with Padlet selected after testing alternative options. The public contributor attended the workshop, facilitated one of the breakout rooms and participated in discussions. All three contributed to the manuscript, including writing and editing the sections describing their involvement, providing reflective statements and designing the figure. All three are named co-authors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70928","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The multidisciplinary ecosystem to study life course determinants and prevention of early-onset burdensome multimorbidity (MELD-B) project examined early-life factors that contribute to the risk of developing multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) in adulthood. Insights from an initial stakeholder workshop shaped the project's direction and priorities. To continue this collaborative approach, we developed a second workshop with public contributors to reflect on how our research aligns with current early-life policies. We defined these as policies that support children and their families at an early stage to mitigate risk factors and strengthen protective factors for health and wellbeing across the life course, thereby reducing the risk of MLTC later in life. The workshop explored challenges facing children and young people within the system, considered practical applications of the research findings and identified priorities for future research.

Methods

The research team worked with three public contributors (one adult member of the MELD-B Advisory Group and two young researchers) to develop the workshop in terms of its questions, structure and format. Stakeholders were divided into three mixed-background groups, each facilitated by two team members, and discussions centred on predefined questions. Padlet (an online whiteboard) was used to collate ideas. Themes from the breakout rooms and full group discussions were initially identified with the aid of AI (Institutional account of Microsoft Copilot).

Results

Fifteen stakeholders from backgrounds including health visiting (n = 2), charities (n = 1), academics (n = 3), healthcare practitioners (n = 5) and council employees (n = 4), attended the workshop. Stakeholders emphasised that wider systems and environments shape child and family outcomes, with poverty and socioeconomic inequality acting as major upstream drivers. Stakeholders noted that gaps in data, fragmented information systems and poor linkage hinder informed decision-making, while short-term political and budget cycles, workforce pressures, insufficient funding and implementation challenges reduce the impact of early-years policies. Stakeholders agreed that the early years are the most critical period for effective action and require coordinated, cross-sector, whole-system approaches. Stakeholders highlighted the need for research to be translated into clear, actionable guidance, and stressed the importance of participatory engagement, clear communication and relational ways of working.

Conclusions

Our workshop identified key barriers to early-life policies as well as areas of best practice to guide future action.

Patient or Public Contribution

A public contributor who is a member of the MELD-B PPI Advisory Group and two young researchers from NxtGen, a young researcher training programme at the University of Southampton, were actively involved throughout the development and delivery of the workshop. They helped identify stakeholders to invite, developed the workshop agenda and contributed to the design of presentation materials. Their input shaped how key messages were communicated, helping to ensure that these were engaging, accessible and aligned with policies relevant to young people identified through previous NxtGen research. They also advised on the choice of interactive tools, with Padlet selected after testing alternative options. The public contributor attended the workshop, facilitated one of the breakout rooms and participated in discussions. All three contributed to the manuscript, including writing and editing the sections describing their involvement, providing reflective statements and designing the figure. All three are named co-authors.

生命早期政策和多种长期疾病的预防:与公共贡献者合作开发的利益相关者研讨会的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书