Effects of different doses of ulinastatin on early inflammatory responses and prognosis in patients with extremely severe burns: A retrospective observational cohort study.

IF 2.6 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Science Progress Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-15 DOI:10.1177/00368504261498136
Nanhong Jiang, Deyun Wang, Feng Liu, Xiaojian Lu
{"title":"Effects of different doses of ulinastatin on early inflammatory responses and prognosis in patients with extremely severe burns: A retrospective observational cohort study.","authors":"Nanhong Jiang, Deyun Wang, Feng Liu, Xiaojian Lu","doi":"10.1177/00368504261498136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the impact of routine- and high-dose ulinastatin on the occurrence of burn sepsis, early-phase inflammatory responses and organ function indices in patients with extremely severe burns.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted involving 106 patients with extremely severe burns. These patients were categorized into three groups: routine treatment, routine-dose ulinastatin treatment, and high-dose ulinastatin treatment. All patients received standard care, including fluid resuscitation, anti-infection therapy, and surgical debridement. Patients in the two ulinastatin groups received intravenous ulinastatin at doses of 100 kU and 300 kU three times daily for seven days. Inflammatory and organ function markers were measured at admission and on post-burn days 3 and 7. The primary clinical outcome within 30 days after burn injury was burn sepsis. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify predictors associated with burn sepsis.ResultsOn post-burn day 7, the high-dose ulinastatin treatment group exhibited lower white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) than the routine treatment group (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). In addition, the routine-dose treatment group showed a reduced neutrophil count compared to the routine treatment group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The 30-day incidence of burn sepsis was significantly lower in the high-dose ulinastatin treatment group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis identified that high-dose ulinastatin therapy was independently associated with a lower risk of burn sepsis, whereas inhalation injury and time to first surgical debridement were independently associated with a higher risk of burn sepsis.ConclusionThis study shows that high-dose ulinastatin is associated with a blunted inflammatory response, lower BUN levels, and lower odds of burn sepsis in patients with extremely severe burns.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"109 4","pages":"368504261498136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504261498136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the impact of routine- and high-dose ulinastatin on the occurrence of burn sepsis, early-phase inflammatory responses and organ function indices in patients with extremely severe burns.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted involving 106 patients with extremely severe burns. These patients were categorized into three groups: routine treatment, routine-dose ulinastatin treatment, and high-dose ulinastatin treatment. All patients received standard care, including fluid resuscitation, anti-infection therapy, and surgical debridement. Patients in the two ulinastatin groups received intravenous ulinastatin at doses of 100 kU and 300 kU three times daily for seven days. Inflammatory and organ function markers were measured at admission and on post-burn days 3 and 7. The primary clinical outcome within 30 days after burn injury was burn sepsis. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify predictors associated with burn sepsis.ResultsOn post-burn day 7, the high-dose ulinastatin treatment group exhibited lower white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) than the routine treatment group (all P < 0.05). In addition, the routine-dose treatment group showed a reduced neutrophil count compared to the routine treatment group (P < 0.05). The 30-day incidence of burn sepsis was significantly lower in the high-dose ulinastatin treatment group (P < 0.05). Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis identified that high-dose ulinastatin therapy was independently associated with a lower risk of burn sepsis, whereas inhalation injury and time to first surgical debridement were independently associated with a higher risk of burn sepsis.ConclusionThis study shows that high-dose ulinastatin is associated with a blunted inflammatory response, lower BUN levels, and lower odds of burn sepsis in patients with extremely severe burns.

不同剂量乌司他丁对极重度烧伤患者早期炎症反应和预后的影响:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书