Adherence to cognitive training in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Ying Zhu, Qiuxia Qian, Jia Li, Yunhang Wang, Yu Zhu, Nini Shi, Hongyan Zhang, Fanghong Yan, Yuxia Ma
{"title":"Adherence to cognitive training in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ying Zhu, Qiuxia Qian, Jia Li, Yunhang Wang, Yu Zhu, Nini Shi, Hongyan Zhang, Fanghong Yan, Yuxia Ma","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2026.2738748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated adherence to cognitive training among patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from inception to 12 August 2026. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool or the JBI Quality Assessment Tool. This review included 32 studies. A random-effects meta-analysis of 20 studies yielded a pooled adherence rate of 81% (95% confidence interval: 72-89%; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 99.23%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Definitions of adherence were reported in 23 studies and covered attendance, completion, and training dose, commonly measured using session-based or participant-based proportions. The descriptive synthesis suggested that adherence varied according to intervention duration and setting. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses yielded pooled rates of 80-84%, supporting the numerical stability of the primary estimate despite persistent heterogeneity. Cognitive training showed relatively high adherence among patients with MCI and dementia. Standardized adherence assessment and reporting are needed to support implementation in clinical and community settings.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06499272..</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2026.2738748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated adherence to cognitive training among patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from inception to 12 August 2026. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool or the JBI Quality Assessment Tool. This review included 32 studies. A random-effects meta-analysis of 20 studies yielded a pooled adherence rate of 81% (95% confidence interval: 72-89%; I2 = 99.23%, P < 0.001). Definitions of adherence were reported in 23 studies and covered attendance, completion, and training dose, commonly measured using session-based or participant-based proportions. The descriptive synthesis suggested that adherence varied according to intervention duration and setting. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses yielded pooled rates of 80-84%, supporting the numerical stability of the primary estimate despite persistent heterogeneity. Cognitive training showed relatively high adherence among patients with MCI and dementia. Standardized adherence assessment and reporting are needed to support implementation in clinical and community settings.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06499272..

轻度认知障碍和痴呆患者坚持认知训练:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书