{"title":"Reduced Detection of Human Orphan Gene Transcripts in Disease Tissue Relative to Expression- and Detection- Matched Controls.","authors":"Y-H Taguchi, Turki Turki","doi":"10.3390/biology15191775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human orphan genes are poorly annotated and lowly expressed, which makes their behavior in disease difficult to establish. We analyzed paired normal and disease RNA-seq libraries from four cohorts, quantified against a combined reference in which 2190 of 198,507 transcripts are orphan. Cohorts were first screened for library-level differences between the two conditions, and one (GSE40419, lung adenocarcinoma) was excluded because sequencing depth, pseudoalignment rate, and submission provenance all differed by condition; it is retained throughout as a calibration. In the remaining three cohorts, comprising 151 matched pairs from psoriasis, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma, we measured the change in the fraction of transcripts with zero abundance, a quantity that does not depend on any transformation of expression. Orphan transcripts lose detection relative to non-orphan transcripts matched on abundance and on cross-patient detection frequency, by +0.0250±0.0178, +0.0553±0.0073, and +0.0659±0.0122 once the global shift in detection is held fixed. The three estimates are homogeneous (p=0.163) and pool to +0.0544±0.0059, whereas the same analysis applied to the excluded cohort returns thirteen times that value. We report the result at the level at which it is measured, and withdraw the patient-level and cohort-specific claims made in the first preprint version of this work.</p>","PeriodicalId":48624,"journal":{"name":"Biology-Basel","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13664223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15191775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Human orphan genes are poorly annotated and lowly expressed, which makes their behavior in disease difficult to establish. We analyzed paired normal and disease RNA-seq libraries from four cohorts, quantified against a combined reference in which 2190 of 198,507 transcripts are orphan. Cohorts were first screened for library-level differences between the two conditions, and one (GSE40419, lung adenocarcinoma) was excluded because sequencing depth, pseudoalignment rate, and submission provenance all differed by condition; it is retained throughout as a calibration. In the remaining three cohorts, comprising 151 matched pairs from psoriasis, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma, we measured the change in the fraction of transcripts with zero abundance, a quantity that does not depend on any transformation of expression. Orphan transcripts lose detection relative to non-orphan transcripts matched on abundance and on cross-patient detection frequency, by +0.0250±0.0178, +0.0553±0.0073, and +0.0659±0.0122 once the global shift in detection is held fixed. The three estimates are homogeneous (p=0.163) and pool to +0.0544±0.0059, whereas the same analysis applied to the excluded cohort returns thirteen times that value. We report the result at the level at which it is measured, and withdraw the patient-level and cohort-specific claims made in the first preprint version of this work.
期刊介绍:
Biology (ISSN 2079-7737) is an international, peer-reviewed, quick-refereeing open access journal of Biological Science published by MDPI online. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications in all areas of biology and at the interface of related disciplines. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.