Efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab versus adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin/carboplatin after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a real-world analysis using a Japanese large-scale claims database.
{"title":"Efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab versus adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin/carboplatin after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a real-world analysis using a Japanese large-scale claims database.","authors":"Akihito Hashizume, Takashi Kawahara, Masanobu Yamazaki, Daiki Ueno, Shinnosuke Kuroda, Teppei Takeshima, Daiji Takamoto, Takeaki Noguchi, Yasushi Yumura, Hiroji Uemura, Kazuhide Makiyama, Jun-Ichi Teranishi","doi":"10.1159/uin/aewag029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is a standard treatment after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab in UTUC remains unclear, especially in real clinical practice. We examined this using a large Japanese real-world database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Medical Data Vision database, we identified UTUC patients who underwent RNU and received adjuvant therapy. The adjuvant GC/GCarbo group and the adjuvant nivolumab group were defined by distinct treatment eras to reduce treatment selection bias. Event-free survival (EFS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, with a sensitivity analysis truncating follow-up at 300 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,058 patients were analyzed (240 nivolumab, 818 GC/GCarbo). In the whole cohort, EFS was significantly longer in the nivolumab group (HR = 0.6365, P = 0.0076). This benefit was consistent in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.4053, P = 0.001) and in those without it (HR = 0.6765, P = 0.0462).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Japanese UTUC patients, adjuvant nivolumab may be at least not inferior to GC/GCarbo, suggesting the usefulness of an immunotherapy-after-chemotherapy sequence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/uin/aewag029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is a standard treatment after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab in UTUC remains unclear, especially in real clinical practice. We examined this using a large Japanese real-world database.
Methods: Using the Medical Data Vision database, we identified UTUC patients who underwent RNU and received adjuvant therapy. The adjuvant GC/GCarbo group and the adjuvant nivolumab group were defined by distinct treatment eras to reduce treatment selection bias. Event-free survival (EFS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, with a sensitivity analysis truncating follow-up at 300 days.
Results: A total of 1,058 patients were analyzed (240 nivolumab, 818 GC/GCarbo). In the whole cohort, EFS was significantly longer in the nivolumab group (HR = 0.6365, P = 0.0076). This benefit was consistent in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.4053, P = 0.001) and in those without it (HR = 0.6765, P = 0.0462).
Conclusion: In Japanese UTUC patients, adjuvant nivolumab may be at least not inferior to GC/GCarbo, suggesting the usefulness of an immunotherapy-after-chemotherapy sequence.
期刊介绍:
Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.