AI-enhanced routine CT for opportunistic osteoporosis screening and risk assessment.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mengyao Guo, Run Xu, Zeyang Miao, Peng Luo, Guanwu Li
{"title":"AI-enhanced routine CT for opportunistic osteoporosis screening and risk assessment.","authors":"Mengyao Guo, Run Xu, Zeyang Miao, Peng Luo, Guanwu Li","doi":"10.1007/s00256-026-05403-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osteoporosis-related fractures create a large and often preventable burden, yet many individuals undergoing CT for unrelated care do not receive skeletal assessment. This review evaluates artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled use of routine CT for opportunistic case-finding and risk assessment, with emphasis on the boundary between promising retrospective performance and safe clinical implementation. Automated vertebral segmentation and CT-derived bone-density estimation can reduce manual workload, and published diagnostic studies report high discrimination in selected cohorts. However, pooled estimates are heterogeneous because the reference standard, anatomical target, CT acquisition, reconstruction, contrast status, calibration method, prevalence, and validation design differ substantially across studies. These differences preclude a universal CT threshold or a universal minimum detector-row requirement; detector-row configuration should be considered together with the broader acquisition and reconstruction parameters. For implementation, AI should be deployed as a validated triage tool-not as a stand-alone diagnostic replacement for clinical assessment and indicated DXA/QCT. A credible pathway requires a defined CT-protocol eligibility check; pre-specified vertebral region of interest and exclusions; protocol- and contrast-aware quantification; scanner-specific quality assurance and calibration monitoring where applicable; external validation in representative populations; and an explicit route from an AI alert to confirmatory testing and treatment evaluation. AI may also enable concurrent vertebral-fracture and body-composition assessment, but clinical utility must be shown through downstream testing, treatment, fracture, workload, equity, and cost outcomes. The near-term priority is therefore not higher retrospective diagnostic performance alone, but reproducible, transparent, and prospectively evaluated integration into radiology workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-026-05403-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Osteoporosis-related fractures create a large and often preventable burden, yet many individuals undergoing CT for unrelated care do not receive skeletal assessment. This review evaluates artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled use of routine CT for opportunistic case-finding and risk assessment, with emphasis on the boundary between promising retrospective performance and safe clinical implementation. Automated vertebral segmentation and CT-derived bone-density estimation can reduce manual workload, and published diagnostic studies report high discrimination in selected cohorts. However, pooled estimates are heterogeneous because the reference standard, anatomical target, CT acquisition, reconstruction, contrast status, calibration method, prevalence, and validation design differ substantially across studies. These differences preclude a universal CT threshold or a universal minimum detector-row requirement; detector-row configuration should be considered together with the broader acquisition and reconstruction parameters. For implementation, AI should be deployed as a validated triage tool-not as a stand-alone diagnostic replacement for clinical assessment and indicated DXA/QCT. A credible pathway requires a defined CT-protocol eligibility check; pre-specified vertebral region of interest and exclusions; protocol- and contrast-aware quantification; scanner-specific quality assurance and calibration monitoring where applicable; external validation in representative populations; and an explicit route from an AI alert to confirmatory testing and treatment evaluation. AI may also enable concurrent vertebral-fracture and body-composition assessment, but clinical utility must be shown through downstream testing, treatment, fracture, workload, equity, and cost outcomes. The near-term priority is therefore not higher retrospective diagnostic performance alone, but reproducible, transparent, and prospectively evaluated integration into radiology workflows.

人工智能增强常规CT筛查机会性骨质疏松症及风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书