Carolina Del-Valle-Soto, Violeta Corona, Regina Gómez Padilla, Fátima Sofía Walls Fernández, Juan-Carlos López-Pimentel, Carlos Mex-Perera, Paolo Visconti, José Varela-Aldás
{"title":"Channel-Specific Stimulus Sensitivity, Reliability, and Complementarity of Multimodal Wearable Sensing During Short-Form Influencer Video Exposure.","authors":"Carolina Del-Valle-Soto, Violeta Corona, Regina Gómez Padilla, Fátima Sofía Walls Fernández, Juan-Carlos López-Pimentel, Carlos Mex-Perera, Paolo Visconti, José Varela-Aldás","doi":"10.3390/s26196354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multimodal wearable sensing is increasingly used to quantify audience engagement with short-form video, yet it remains unclear which sensing channels actually carry stimulus-driven information at the exposure durations typical of this format. We recorded electrodermal activity, photoplethysmographic pulse, triaxial acceleration, video-based eye tracking, and automated facial expression analysis from 50 young adults while they viewed 20 short-form influencer clips (5.6-19.3 s) presented in individually randomized order, yielding 1000 participant × clip trials and 12 primary indices spanning four modalities. Using crossed random-effects variance partitioning, split-half reliability with Spearman-Brown projection, permutation-based multivariate testing, participant-wise decoding, and inter-subject correlation, we show that stimulus-driven variance is strongly channel-specific: it reaches 13.7% for fixation rate and 10.2% for facial engagement but only 0.11% for pulse rate and 0.23% for RMSSD. Clip-level estimates were highly reliable for facial and oculomotor indices (r=0.82-0.94) and poor for autonomic indices (r=0.34-0.58), which would require 134-370 participants to reach ρ=0.80. Between-modality dependence was almost six times weaker than within-modality dependence, and five components were retained by parallel analysis. Oculomotor and facial features jointly identified individual clips at 16.8% balanced accuracy against a 5% chance level, whereas electrodermal and pulse features, taken separately, did not exceed chance. Electrodermal responses were nonetheless stimulus-locked in 18 of 20 clips. A per-second re-analysis of nine channels showed that the ordering partly reverses for within-clip dynamics: tonic electrodermal and pupil time courses were reliable across viewers (ρ50=0.88 and 0.93), facial time courses were not (ρ50≤0.69), and pulse rate was unreliable under both treatments. We derive explicit design guidance for sensor selection and sample size in short-exposure multimodal engagement studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21698,"journal":{"name":"Sensors","volume":"26 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13667562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/s26196354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multimodal wearable sensing is increasingly used to quantify audience engagement with short-form video, yet it remains unclear which sensing channels actually carry stimulus-driven information at the exposure durations typical of this format. We recorded electrodermal activity, photoplethysmographic pulse, triaxial acceleration, video-based eye tracking, and automated facial expression analysis from 50 young adults while they viewed 20 short-form influencer clips (5.6-19.3 s) presented in individually randomized order, yielding 1000 participant × clip trials and 12 primary indices spanning four modalities. Using crossed random-effects variance partitioning, split-half reliability with Spearman-Brown projection, permutation-based multivariate testing, participant-wise decoding, and inter-subject correlation, we show that stimulus-driven variance is strongly channel-specific: it reaches 13.7% for fixation rate and 10.2% for facial engagement but only 0.11% for pulse rate and 0.23% for RMSSD. Clip-level estimates were highly reliable for facial and oculomotor indices (r=0.82-0.94) and poor for autonomic indices (r=0.34-0.58), which would require 134-370 participants to reach ρ=0.80. Between-modality dependence was almost six times weaker than within-modality dependence, and five components were retained by parallel analysis. Oculomotor and facial features jointly identified individual clips at 16.8% balanced accuracy against a 5% chance level, whereas electrodermal and pulse features, taken separately, did not exceed chance. Electrodermal responses were nonetheless stimulus-locked in 18 of 20 clips. A per-second re-analysis of nine channels showed that the ordering partly reverses for within-clip dynamics: tonic electrodermal and pupil time courses were reliable across viewers (ρ50=0.88 and 0.93), facial time courses were not (ρ50≤0.69), and pulse rate was unreliable under both treatments. We derive explicit design guidance for sensor selection and sample size in short-exposure multimodal engagement studies.
期刊介绍:
Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of sensors and biosensors. It publishes reviews (including comprehensive reviews on the complete sensors products), regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.