Atovaquone-proguanil chemoprophylaxis during pregnancy: a case series and a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Juliette Condé, Bénédicte Coulm, Florence Tubach, Delphine Beghin, Valérie Pourcher, Isabelle Monier, Nathalie Lelong, Julie Tort, Mathilde Latour, Catherine Vauzelle, Elisabeth Elefant, Jonathan Luke Richardson, Agnès Dechartres, Benoît Marin
{"title":"Atovaquone-proguanil chemoprophylaxis during pregnancy: a case series and a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Juliette Condé, Bénédicte Coulm, Florence Tubach, Delphine Beghin, Valérie Pourcher, Isabelle Monier, Nathalie Lelong, Julie Tort, Mathilde Latour, Catherine Vauzelle, Elisabeth Elefant, Jonathan Luke Richardson, Agnès Dechartres, Benoît Marin","doi":"10.1093/jtm/taag088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnant women travelling to malaria endemic areas require effective chemoprophylaxis, with limited options including atovaquone-proguanil (AP) for which safety data remain limited. Our objective was to describe the prevalences of pregnancy outcomes and major congenital anomaly (MCA) following AP chemoprophylaxis during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We combined a case series from the French national Teratology Information Service (CRAT) and a systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA), including prospective pregnancies exposed to AP for chemoprophylaxis. Outcomes were prevalence of pregnancy outcomes and MCA. The case series included all pregnancies referred to the CRAT with an expected date of delivery between 2009-2025, and known outcome. The SRMA searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases and grey literature up to 16/09/2025. Study selection and data extraction were performed using an independent dual review process. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Pooled prevalences were estimated using random-effects models. GRADE was used to assess certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our case series included 191 AP-exposed pregnancies (133 during first-trimester (T1) and 75 during second/third trimester) resulting in 85.9% livebirths (n=164), 10.0% miscarriages (n=19), 1.0% medical abortions (n=2), 1.0% stillbirth (n=2) and 2.1% elective termination (n=4). The prevalence of MCA among T1-exposed pregnancies with documented MCA status (n=110) was 3.6% (95%CI[1.0;9.0]). The SRMA included four studies, which when combined with our case series (555 AP-exposed pregnancies, 457 during T1) produced a pooled prevalence of livebirths of 80.3% (95%CI[72.3;87.2], I2=67.2%, Phet=0,047), 14.6% miscarriages (95%CI[7.3;23.9], I2=73.2%, Phet=0,024) and 2.7% for MCA (95%CI[1.2;4.8], I2=0.0%, Phet=0,45). Level of evidence was low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that pregnancy outcomes and MCA following AP chemoprophylaxis exposure are similar to the general population prevalences, with a low level of evidence. These data strengthen the evidence supporting a reassuring safety profile, and AP may represent a reasonable option for pregnant women requiring malaria chemoprophylaxis after risk-benefit assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of travel medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of travel medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taag088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women travelling to malaria endemic areas require effective chemoprophylaxis, with limited options including atovaquone-proguanil (AP) for which safety data remain limited. Our objective was to describe the prevalences of pregnancy outcomes and major congenital anomaly (MCA) following AP chemoprophylaxis during pregnancy.

Methods: We combined a case series from the French national Teratology Information Service (CRAT) and a systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA), including prospective pregnancies exposed to AP for chemoprophylaxis. Outcomes were prevalence of pregnancy outcomes and MCA. The case series included all pregnancies referred to the CRAT with an expected date of delivery between 2009-2025, and known outcome. The SRMA searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases and grey literature up to 16/09/2025. Study selection and data extraction were performed using an independent dual review process. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Pooled prevalences were estimated using random-effects models. GRADE was used to assess certainty of evidence.

Results: Our case series included 191 AP-exposed pregnancies (133 during first-trimester (T1) and 75 during second/third trimester) resulting in 85.9% livebirths (n=164), 10.0% miscarriages (n=19), 1.0% medical abortions (n=2), 1.0% stillbirth (n=2) and 2.1% elective termination (n=4). The prevalence of MCA among T1-exposed pregnancies with documented MCA status (n=110) was 3.6% (95%CI[1.0;9.0]). The SRMA included four studies, which when combined with our case series (555 AP-exposed pregnancies, 457 during T1) produced a pooled prevalence of livebirths of 80.3% (95%CI[72.3;87.2], I2=67.2%, Phet=0,047), 14.6% miscarriages (95%CI[7.3;23.9], I2=73.2%, Phet=0,024) and 2.7% for MCA (95%CI[1.2;4.8], I2=0.0%, Phet=0,45). Level of evidence was low.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that pregnancy outcomes and MCA following AP chemoprophylaxis exposure are similar to the general population prevalences, with a low level of evidence. These data strengthen the evidence supporting a reassuring safety profile, and AP may represent a reasonable option for pregnant women requiring malaria chemoprophylaxis after risk-benefit assessment.

妊娠期阿托伐醌-原胍化学预防:病例系列、系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:前往疟疾流行地区的孕妇需要有效的化学预防,选择有限,包括阿托伐醌-普罗胍(AP),其安全性数据仍然有限。我们的目的是描述妊娠期间AP化学预防后妊娠结局和主要先天性异常(MCA)的患病率。方法:我们结合了来自法国国家畸形学信息服务(CRAT)的病例系列和系统回顾和荟萃分析(SRMA),包括暴露于AP进行化学预防的准孕妇。结果是妊娠结局和MCA的患病率。该病例系列包括所有提交CRAT的孕妇,预产期在2009-2025年之间,以及已知的结局。SRMA检索了截至2025年9月16日的Medline、Embase、Cochrane数据库和灰色文献。研究选择和数据提取采用独立的双重审查过程进行。采用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型估计合并患病率。GRADE用于评估证据的确定性。结果:我们的病例系列包括191例暴露于ap的妊娠(133例在妊娠早期(T1), 75例在妊娠中期/晚期),导致85.9%的活产(n=164), 10.0%的流产(n=19), 1.0%的药物流产(n=2), 1.0%的死产(n=2)和2.1%的选择性终止妊娠(n=4)。在有MCA记录的t1暴露孕妇(n=110)中,MCA的患病率为3.6% (95%CI[1.0;9.0])。SRMA纳入了四项研究,结合我们的病例系列(555例暴露于ap的妊娠,457例在T1期间),得出活产的总患病率为80.3% (95%CI[72.3;87.2], I2=67.2%, Phet= 0.047),流产的总患病率为14.6% (95%CI[7.3;23.9], I2=73.2%, Phet= 0.024), MCA的总患病率为2.7% (95%CI[1.2;4.8], I2=0.0%, Phet=0,45)。证据水平很低。结论:我们的研究结果表明,AP化学预防暴露后的妊娠结局和MCA与一般人群患病率相似,证据水平较低。这些数据加强了支持可靠安全性的证据,在风险-效益评估后,AP可能是需要疟疾化学预防的孕妇的合理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of travel medicine
Journal of travel medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
5.10%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Travel Medicine is a publication that focuses on travel medicine and its intersection with other disciplines. It publishes cutting-edge research, consensus papers, policy papers, and expert reviews. The journal is affiliated with the Asia Pacific Travel Health Society. The journal's main areas of interest include the prevention and management of travel-associated infections, non-communicable diseases, vaccines, malaria prevention and treatment, multi-drug resistant pathogens, and surveillance on all individuals crossing international borders. The Journal of Travel Medicine is indexed in multiple major indexing services, including Adis International Ltd., CABI, EBSCOhost, Elsevier BV, Gale, Journal Watch Infectious Diseases (Online), MetaPress, National Library of Medicine, OCLC, Ovid, ProQuest, Thomson Reuters, and the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书