Comparison of clinical outcomes, cost, and patient perceptions between delayed and immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery in Thailand: a retrospective case-control study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Aim-On Saengsirinavin, Thiti Wichayachiwin, Thanida Voraviwat, Frances Andrea Anover, Ngoc Trong Tuong Than, Negin Yavari, Jia-Horung Hung, Jingli Gou, Christopher Or, Quan Dong Nguyen, Prin Rojanapongpun
{"title":"Comparison of clinical outcomes, cost, and patient perceptions between delayed and immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery in Thailand: a retrospective case-control study.","authors":"Aim-On Saengsirinavin, Thiti Wichayachiwin, Thanida Voraviwat, Frances Andrea Anover, Ngoc Trong Tuong Than, Negin Yavari, Jia-Horung Hung, Jingli Gou, Christopher Or, Quan Dong Nguyen, Prin Rojanapongpun","doi":"10.1007/s10792-026-04271-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes, complication rates, costs, and patient perceptions-encompassing satisfaction, anxiety, pain, and visual function-between delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS) and immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH) and Sukhumvit Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative study was performed, including 201 adult patients (402 eyes) who underwent DSBCS (n = 99) or ISBCS (n = 102), performed by a single surgeon between January 2016 and December 2023. Patient perceptions were assessed through structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No major intraoperative or postoperative complications-including posterior capsule rupture or endophthalmitis-were observed in either group. Postoperative visual acuity (LogMAR) and refraction within ±0.5D of target were comparable between groups (61.6% DSBCS vs 65.5% ISBCS, p = 0.485). ISBCS patients reported significantly higher anxiety scores (median 3 vs 2, p = 0.002) and lower satisfaction scores (median 8 vs 10, p < 0.001) than DSBCS patients. ISBCS patients also reported significantly higher pain during surgery (p < 0.001). DSBCS patients demonstrated greater improvement in near visual function, specifically reading (median improvement 3 vs 2, p = 0.021) and computer use (p < 0.001). The total healthcare cost was significantly higher for DSBCS (USD 1,624 [IQR 1,492-4,029]) compared to ISBCS (USD 1,012 [IQR 910-1,839]) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Safety and efficacy outcomes were equivalent for DSBCS and ISBCS. However, ISBCS patients reported higher anxiety, greater pain during surgery, and lower satisfaction compared to DSBCS. DSBCS patients demonstrated greater improvement in near visual function. The overall cost was significantly lower for ISBCS, a finding consistent across both government and private hospital settings. These results highlight the need for interventions to reduce perioperative anxiety and pain in ISBCS patients, and provide Thai-specific evidence to inform healthcare policy decisions regarding the wider implementation of ISBCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13672390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-026-04271-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes, complication rates, costs, and patient perceptions-encompassing satisfaction, anxiety, pain, and visual function-between delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS) and immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in Thailand.

Setting: King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH) and Sukhumvit Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Methods: A retrospective comparative study was performed, including 201 adult patients (402 eyes) who underwent DSBCS (n = 99) or ISBCS (n = 102), performed by a single surgeon between January 2016 and December 2023. Patient perceptions were assessed through structured interviews.

Results: No major intraoperative or postoperative complications-including posterior capsule rupture or endophthalmitis-were observed in either group. Postoperative visual acuity (LogMAR) and refraction within ±0.5D of target were comparable between groups (61.6% DSBCS vs 65.5% ISBCS, p = 0.485). ISBCS patients reported significantly higher anxiety scores (median 3 vs 2, p = 0.002) and lower satisfaction scores (median 8 vs 10, p < 0.001) than DSBCS patients. ISBCS patients also reported significantly higher pain during surgery (p < 0.001). DSBCS patients demonstrated greater improvement in near visual function, specifically reading (median improvement 3 vs 2, p = 0.021) and computer use (p < 0.001). The total healthcare cost was significantly higher for DSBCS (USD 1,624 [IQR 1,492-4,029]) compared to ISBCS (USD 1,012 [IQR 910-1,839]) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Safety and efficacy outcomes were equivalent for DSBCS and ISBCS. However, ISBCS patients reported higher anxiety, greater pain during surgery, and lower satisfaction compared to DSBCS. DSBCS patients demonstrated greater improvement in near visual function. The overall cost was significantly lower for ISBCS, a finding consistent across both government and private hospital settings. These results highlight the need for interventions to reduce perioperative anxiety and pain in ISBCS patients, and provide Thai-specific evidence to inform healthcare policy decisions regarding the wider implementation of ISBCS.

泰国延迟和立即顺序双侧白内障手术的临床结果、成本和患者感知的比较:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书