Incremental value of DXA-derived visceral versus total adiposity beyond routine anthropometric assessment for hypertension discrimination: a population-based study.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie, Haider Mannan, Evan Atlantis
{"title":"Incremental value of DXA-derived visceral versus total adiposity beyond routine anthropometric assessment for hypertension discrimination: a population-based study.","authors":"Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie, Haider Mannan, Evan Atlantis","doi":"10.1038/s41440-026-02857-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertension is strongly linked to obesity, yet it remains uncertain whether DXA-derived measures of adiposity improve hypertension discrimination beyond routine anthropometric assessment and whether any incremental value reflects visceral rather than total adiposity. This study examined whether DXA-derived visceral and total adiposity provide incremental discriminatory value beyond routine anthropometric assessment for hypertension discrimination. We analyzed 7817 adults aged 20-59 years from the 2013 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with valid DXA measurements. Discriminatory performance and the incremental value of DXA-derived adiposity measures beyond anthropometric assessment were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, model fit, and reclassification metrics. Among routinely available anthropometric measures, waist circumference demonstrated the highest discriminatory performance for hypertension (AUC 0.791, 95% CI: 0.780-0.802). Addition of DXA-derived visceral adiposity significantly improved discrimination (AUC 0.865, ΔAUC = 0.074) and significantly improved model fit beyond waist circumference (P < 0.001), whereas total adiposity measured by fat mass index provided negligible incremental value (ΔAUC = 0.0020) and did not improve model fit. Reclassification metrics yielded consistent findings, and results generally remained robust across sensitivity analyses; however, when hypertension was defined using measured blood pressure alone, the incremental improvement was attenuated (ΔAUC = 0.012 vs. 0.074). Among DXA-derived adiposity measures, only visceral adiposity provided meaningful incremental discriminatory value beyond the best-performing routine anthropometric measure, whereas total adiposity did not. These findings suggest that when DXA-based body composition assessment is performed, the clinically relevant information may be derived from visceral rather than total adiposity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-026-02857-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypertension is strongly linked to obesity, yet it remains uncertain whether DXA-derived measures of adiposity improve hypertension discrimination beyond routine anthropometric assessment and whether any incremental value reflects visceral rather than total adiposity. This study examined whether DXA-derived visceral and total adiposity provide incremental discriminatory value beyond routine anthropometric assessment for hypertension discrimination. We analyzed 7817 adults aged 20-59 years from the 2013 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with valid DXA measurements. Discriminatory performance and the incremental value of DXA-derived adiposity measures beyond anthropometric assessment were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, model fit, and reclassification metrics. Among routinely available anthropometric measures, waist circumference demonstrated the highest discriminatory performance for hypertension (AUC 0.791, 95% CI: 0.780-0.802). Addition of DXA-derived visceral adiposity significantly improved discrimination (AUC 0.865, ΔAUC = 0.074) and significantly improved model fit beyond waist circumference (P < 0.001), whereas total adiposity measured by fat mass index provided negligible incremental value (ΔAUC = 0.0020) and did not improve model fit. Reclassification metrics yielded consistent findings, and results generally remained robust across sensitivity analyses; however, when hypertension was defined using measured blood pressure alone, the incremental improvement was attenuated (ΔAUC = 0.012 vs. 0.074). Among DXA-derived adiposity measures, only visceral adiposity provided meaningful incremental discriminatory value beyond the best-performing routine anthropometric measure, whereas total adiposity did not. These findings suggest that when DXA-based body composition assessment is performed, the clinically relevant information may be derived from visceral rather than total adiposity.

一项基于人群的研究:dxa衍生的内脏脂肪与总脂肪的增量价值超过常规人体测量评估对高血压的区分。
高血压与肥胖密切相关,但目前仍不确定dxa衍生的肥胖测量方法是否能改善常规人体测量评估之外的高血压歧视,以及是否有任何增量值反映内脏而非全部肥胖。本研究探讨了dxa衍生的内脏脂肪和总脂肪是否比常规人体测量评估对高血压的区分提供了更多的区别价值。我们分析了2013年至2018年全国健康与营养调查中7817名年龄在20-59岁之间的成年人,并使用有效的DXA测量。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析、模型拟合和重新分类指标对dxa衍生的肥胖测量的歧视性表现和增量值进行评估。在常规可用的人体测量指标中,腰围对高血压的鉴别效果最高(AUC 0.791, 95% CI: 0.780-0.802)。添加dxa来源的内脏脂肪显著改善了识别(AUC 0.865, ΔAUC = 0.074),并显著改善了腰围以外的模型拟合(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书