Restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation is associated with less intestinal injury after hemorrhagic shock in rats and with coordinated changes in MALAT1, miR-145-5p, and BNIP3 expression.
Hongfei Ma, Yang Zhang, Jie Yang, Tianshan Wu, Gongbing Zhu, Xinwen Yang
{"title":"Restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation is associated with less intestinal injury after hemorrhagic shock in rats and with coordinated changes in MALAT1, miR-145-5p, and BNIP3 expression.","authors":"Hongfei Ma, Yang Zhang, Jie Yang, Tianshan Wu, Gongbing Zhu, Xinwen Yang","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2026.1920366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion contributes to barrier failure and secondary organ injury after hemorrhagic shock. It is not known whether restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation alters the resulting intestinal injury or the accompanying non-coding RNA response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred male Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to normal control, hemorrhagic shock, conventional 0.9% saline resuscitation (CFR), restrictive 7.5% hypertonic saline resuscitation (RFR), or superior mesenteric artery ischemia-reperfusion control groups. Hemorrhagic shock was induced by controlled blood withdrawal to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 35-40 mmHg for 60 min. CFR targeted an MAP of approximately 80 mmHg, whereas RFR targeted an MAP of approximately 60 mmHg. Three-hour survival was recorded. Coagulation, serum IL-6 and TNF-α, qRT-PCR, Western blotting, H&E staining, and TUNEL were assessed in assay-specific subsets. Public GEO datasets were analyzed for exploratory transcriptomic context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hour survival was 75% in RFR and 60% in CFR (two-sided Fisher exact test, <i>P</i> = 0.501). In the coagulation cohort, prothrombin time (PT) and thrombin time (TT) were shorter in RFR than in CFR after Dunn-Holm adjustment; no differences were observed for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), and prothrombin activity (PA). RFR had lower serum IL-6 and TNF-α, better-preserved ileal morphology, and lower TUNEL positivity in representative fields than CFR. MALAT1 was lower, while miR-145-5p and Bnip3/BNIP3 were higher in RFR. Exploratory analyses of public datasets confirmed that Malat1 and Bnip3 are expressed in the intestinal cell populations relevant to ischemia-reperfusion injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under the present experimental conditions, restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation was associated with a less severe acute intestinal injury phenotype than conventional isotonic resuscitation. The coordinated changes in MALAT1, miR-145-5p, and BNIP3 do not establish a linear regulatory axis and require functional validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"13 ","pages":"1920366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1920366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion contributes to barrier failure and secondary organ injury after hemorrhagic shock. It is not known whether restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation alters the resulting intestinal injury or the accompanying non-coding RNA response.
Methods: One hundred male Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to normal control, hemorrhagic shock, conventional 0.9% saline resuscitation (CFR), restrictive 7.5% hypertonic saline resuscitation (RFR), or superior mesenteric artery ischemia-reperfusion control groups. Hemorrhagic shock was induced by controlled blood withdrawal to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 35-40 mmHg for 60 min. CFR targeted an MAP of approximately 80 mmHg, whereas RFR targeted an MAP of approximately 60 mmHg. Three-hour survival was recorded. Coagulation, serum IL-6 and TNF-α, qRT-PCR, Western blotting, H&E staining, and TUNEL were assessed in assay-specific subsets. Public GEO datasets were analyzed for exploratory transcriptomic context.
Results: Three-hour survival was 75% in RFR and 60% in CFR (two-sided Fisher exact test, P = 0.501). In the coagulation cohort, prothrombin time (PT) and thrombin time (TT) were shorter in RFR than in CFR after Dunn-Holm adjustment; no differences were observed for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), and prothrombin activity (PA). RFR had lower serum IL-6 and TNF-α, better-preserved ileal morphology, and lower TUNEL positivity in representative fields than CFR. MALAT1 was lower, while miR-145-5p and Bnip3/BNIP3 were higher in RFR. Exploratory analyses of public datasets confirmed that Malat1 and Bnip3 are expressed in the intestinal cell populations relevant to ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Conclusion: Under the present experimental conditions, restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation was associated with a less severe acute intestinal injury phenotype than conventional isotonic resuscitation. The coordinated changes in MALAT1, miR-145-5p, and BNIP3 do not establish a linear regulatory axis and require functional validation.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.