Daibing Lv, Ming Jin, Xi Meng, Weizhong Zhang, Shanfang Yuan, Yang Ding, Weixi Wang, Jianghua Yang, Xiaoxing Liao
{"title":"A \"stepped\" flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath improves stone clearance efficiency: experimental results from an <i>ex vivo</i> porcine model.","authors":"Daibing Lv, Ming Jin, Xi Meng, Weizhong Zhang, Shanfang Yuan, Yang Ding, Weixi Wang, Jianghua Yang, Xiaoxing Liao","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2026.1959554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a novel \"stepped\" flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (SFV-UAS) on stone clearance efficiency during flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (f-URL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human upper urinary tract stone fragments (< 4 mm) were placed into <i>ex vivo</i> porcine renal pelves. We simulated f-URL stone extraction under continuous irrigation and vacuum suction, comparing the SFV-UAS (ureteral segment 12/14 Fr, cystourethral segment 16/18 Fr) with a conventional flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (FV-UAS)(12/14 Fr). With intrarenal pressure strictly controlled (< 30 mmHg) and constant vacuum suction (01 step), irrigation flow rates were evaluated at 40 mL/min, 50 mL/min, 60 mL/min, 70 mL/min, 80 mL/min, and 90 mL/min. Stone evacuation times were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Sheath type and irrigation flow rate exhibited significant main effects on clearance time [F(1,408) = 189.231, <i>P</i> < 0.01, effect size 31.7%; and F(5,408) = 38.721, <i>P</i> < 0.01, effect size 32.2%, respectively]. A significant two-way interaction was also observed [F(5,408) = 8.372, <i>P</i> < 0.01, effect size 9.3%]. (2) Simple main effects revealed: First, across all corresponding irrigation rates, the SFV-UAS group achieved significantly shorter clearance times than the FV-UAS group (mean differences: MD = -21.598, -18.099, -8.172, -11.129, -9.762, -4.883; all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Second, within the SFV-UAS group, rates ≥ 70 mL/min resulted in significantly shorter clearance times vs. the 40 mL/min baseline (mean differences:MD = -9.393, -9.771, -9.084; all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Although comparisons between 60 mL/min and higher rates were non-significant, 70 mL/min was the lowest evaluated irrigation rate that demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in clearance time compared to the 40 mL/min baseline. Third, within the FV-UAS group, clearance times at ≥ 60 mL/min were significantly shorter than at 40 and 50 mL/min (mean differences:MD = -19.664, -12.370; all <i>P</i> < 0.001), with no significant differences among the ≥ 60 mL/min groups, indicating its plateau at ≥ 60 mL/min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the parameters of this <i>ex vivo</i> model,the SFV-UAS significantly reduces the measured stone clearance time during f-URL compared to the FV-UAS under identical irrigation conditions. For the SFV-UAS group, targeting an irrigation flow rate of ≥ 70 mL/min consistently optimizes stone extraction efficiency relative to baseline conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"13 ","pages":"1959554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1959554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of a novel "stepped" flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (SFV-UAS) on stone clearance efficiency during flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (f-URL).
Methods: Human upper urinary tract stone fragments (< 4 mm) were placed into ex vivo porcine renal pelves. We simulated f-URL stone extraction under continuous irrigation and vacuum suction, comparing the SFV-UAS (ureteral segment 12/14 Fr, cystourethral segment 16/18 Fr) with a conventional flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (FV-UAS)(12/14 Fr). With intrarenal pressure strictly controlled (< 30 mmHg) and constant vacuum suction (01 step), irrigation flow rates were evaluated at 40 mL/min, 50 mL/min, 60 mL/min, 70 mL/min, 80 mL/min, and 90 mL/min. Stone evacuation times were recorded.
Results: (1) Sheath type and irrigation flow rate exhibited significant main effects on clearance time [F(1,408) = 189.231, P < 0.01, effect size 31.7%; and F(5,408) = 38.721, P < 0.01, effect size 32.2%, respectively]. A significant two-way interaction was also observed [F(5,408) = 8.372, P < 0.01, effect size 9.3%]. (2) Simple main effects revealed: First, across all corresponding irrigation rates, the SFV-UAS group achieved significantly shorter clearance times than the FV-UAS group (mean differences: MD = -21.598, -18.099, -8.172, -11.129, -9.762, -4.883; all P < 0.05). Second, within the SFV-UAS group, rates ≥ 70 mL/min resulted in significantly shorter clearance times vs. the 40 mL/min baseline (mean differences:MD = -9.393, -9.771, -9.084; all P < 0.05). Although comparisons between 60 mL/min and higher rates were non-significant, 70 mL/min was the lowest evaluated irrigation rate that demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in clearance time compared to the 40 mL/min baseline. Third, within the FV-UAS group, clearance times at ≥ 60 mL/min were significantly shorter than at 40 and 50 mL/min (mean differences:MD = -19.664, -12.370; all P < 0.001), with no significant differences among the ≥ 60 mL/min groups, indicating its plateau at ≥ 60 mL/min.
Conclusion: Within the parameters of this ex vivo model,the SFV-UAS significantly reduces the measured stone clearance time during f-URL compared to the FV-UAS under identical irrigation conditions. For the SFV-UAS group, targeting an irrigation flow rate of ≥ 70 mL/min consistently optimizes stone extraction efficiency relative to baseline conditions.
目的:评价一种新型“阶梯式”柔性真空辅助输尿管通路鞘(SFV-UAS)对输尿管镜碎石术(f-URL)中结石清除效率的影响。方法:将人上尿路结石(< 4 mm)置入离体猪肾盂内。我们模拟连续灌洗和真空吸引下的f-URL取石,比较SFV-UAS(输尿管段12/ 14fr,膀胱输尿管段16/ 18fr)与传统的柔性真空辅助输尿管通路鞘(FV-UAS)(12/ 14fr)。在严格控制肾内压(< 30 mmHg)和持续真空吸(01步)的情况下,分别在40 mL/min、50 mL/min、60 mL/min、70 mL/min、80 mL/min和90 mL/min下评估冲洗流量。石头疏散时间被记录下来。结果:(1)鞘层类型和灌溉流量对清除时间有显著的主要影响[F(1,408) = 189.231, P P P P P P P P P P P结论:在体外模型参数范围内,在相同的灌溉条件下,SFV-UAS比FV-UAS显著缩短了F - url期间测量的结石清除时间。对于SFV-UAS组,相对于基线条件,目标灌溉流速≥70 mL/min始终能优化结石提取效率。
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.