{"title":"Prosodic regularity and reader reception in three-word rhyming couplets: a four-pronged investigation of <i>Dizi Gui</i>.","authors":"Zheng Wang, Sheng Yu","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1904387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prosodic regularity-characterized by fixed rhythm, end-rhyme, and syntactic parallelism-has been theorized to enhance memorability, but there is limited empirical evidence linking these features to cognitive mechanisms. This study examines whether textual characteristics associated with prosodic regularity and reader-perception patterns are consistent with theoretical accounts of reduced processing demands and chunking-based mnemonic support. Using a corpus-based four-pronged framework, we compared four English translations of a canonical classical Chinese text <i>Dizi Gui</i>, a three-word rhyming couplet version (high prosodic regularity) and three control varieties. Results showed that the rhyming couplets exhibit extreme syntactic compression (mean length = 6.32 words), high lexical diversity (STTR = 47), and a Zipfian slope (-0.65) mirroring the ST (-0.66), indicating a similar macro-level pattern of lexical concentration. Reader data showed that the three-word rhyming version with supplementary annotation received the highest proportions of selections for perceived mnemonic effectiveness (64.35%), aesthetic appeal (42.61%), and popularization potential (57.39%). These converging findings suggest that prosodic regularity may reduce processing demands and support working-memory consolidation through chunking mechanisms, while direct experimental tests of these cognitive mechanisms remain necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1904387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1904387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prosodic regularity-characterized by fixed rhythm, end-rhyme, and syntactic parallelism-has been theorized to enhance memorability, but there is limited empirical evidence linking these features to cognitive mechanisms. This study examines whether textual characteristics associated with prosodic regularity and reader-perception patterns are consistent with theoretical accounts of reduced processing demands and chunking-based mnemonic support. Using a corpus-based four-pronged framework, we compared four English translations of a canonical classical Chinese text Dizi Gui, a three-word rhyming couplet version (high prosodic regularity) and three control varieties. Results showed that the rhyming couplets exhibit extreme syntactic compression (mean length = 6.32 words), high lexical diversity (STTR = 47), and a Zipfian slope (-0.65) mirroring the ST (-0.66), indicating a similar macro-level pattern of lexical concentration. Reader data showed that the three-word rhyming version with supplementary annotation received the highest proportions of selections for perceived mnemonic effectiveness (64.35%), aesthetic appeal (42.61%), and popularization potential (57.39%). These converging findings suggest that prosodic regularity may reduce processing demands and support working-memory consolidation through chunking mechanisms, while direct experimental tests of these cognitive mechanisms remain necessary.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.