Digital PCR-based quantification of Leishmania infantum in Lutzomyia longipalpis: comparison between promastigote and macrophage-derived amastigote infection models.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PARASITOLOGY
Lucas Alexandre Farias de Souza, Gabriela Casani Cardoso, Francielly Maria Wilke Ramos Gos, Daniela de Pita-Pereira, Constança Britto, Edneia Amancio de Souza Ramos, Magda Clara Vieira da Costa-Ribeiro
{"title":"Digital PCR-based quantification of Leishmania infantum in Lutzomyia longipalpis: comparison between promastigote and macrophage-derived amastigote infection models.","authors":"Lucas Alexandre Farias de Souza, Gabriela Casani Cardoso, Francielly Maria Wilke Ramos Gos, Daniela de Pita-Pereira, Constança Britto, Edneia Amancio de Souza Ramos, Magda Clara Vieira da Costa-Ribeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.exppara.2026.109224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) remains a major public health concern in Latin America, particularly in Brazil, where Leishmania infantum is primarily transmitted by the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Understanding parasite development within the vector is essential for elucidating transmission dynamics, yet classical microscopic assessments often lack sensitivity for detecting early or low intensity infections. In this study, Lu. longipalpis females were experimentally infected with either promastigote or amastigote forms of Le. infantum and the infection dynamics were evaluated by both optical microscopy and digital PCR (dPCR). Microscopic examination revealed successful midgut colonization in both groups, with higher parasite counts in amastigote-infected sand fly females during the early phase of infection. Quantification by dPCR confirmed this pattern, detecting significantly higher parasite loads at the initial time points in amastigote-fed sand flies. However, parasite loads converged between groups at later stages, indicating comparable infection dynamics regardless of the parasite infective form. Both methods showed consistent patterns of parasite dynamics, whereas dPCR provided greater sensitivity for detecting and quantifying low parasite burdens, particularly during periods of reduced infection intensity. Overall, our findings provide new insights into parasite-vector interactions and validate dPCR as a precise and sensitive tool for assessing Leishmania infections in sand fly vectors, with potential applications for entomological surveillance and transmission studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12117,"journal":{"name":"Experimental parasitology","volume":" ","pages":"109224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2026.109224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) remains a major public health concern in Latin America, particularly in Brazil, where Leishmania infantum is primarily transmitted by the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Understanding parasite development within the vector is essential for elucidating transmission dynamics, yet classical microscopic assessments often lack sensitivity for detecting early or low intensity infections. In this study, Lu. longipalpis females were experimentally infected with either promastigote or amastigote forms of Le. infantum and the infection dynamics were evaluated by both optical microscopy and digital PCR (dPCR). Microscopic examination revealed successful midgut colonization in both groups, with higher parasite counts in amastigote-infected sand fly females during the early phase of infection. Quantification by dPCR confirmed this pattern, detecting significantly higher parasite loads at the initial time points in amastigote-fed sand flies. However, parasite loads converged between groups at later stages, indicating comparable infection dynamics regardless of the parasite infective form. Both methods showed consistent patterns of parasite dynamics, whereas dPCR provided greater sensitivity for detecting and quantifying low parasite burdens, particularly during periods of reduced infection intensity. Overall, our findings provide new insights into parasite-vector interactions and validate dPCR as a precise and sensitive tool for assessing Leishmania infections in sand fly vectors, with potential applications for entomological surveillance and transmission studies.

长鼻Lutzomyia longipalpis婴儿利什曼原虫的数字pcr定量:promastigote和巨噬细胞来源的amastigote感染模型的比较。
内脏利什曼病(VL)在拉丁美洲仍然是一个主要的公共卫生问题,特别是在巴西,那里的婴儿利什曼病主要由沙蝇长腹卢zomyia longipalpis传播。了解媒介内寄生虫的发育对于阐明传播动力学至关重要,然而经典的显微镜评估往往缺乏检测早期或低强度感染的敏感性。在这项研究中,陆。实验中,长臂猿雌性分别感染了Le的原性和无尾型。采用光学显微镜和数字PCR (dPCR)方法对婴儿和感染动态进行评估。显微镜检查显示,两组中肠道定植成功,在感染早期,感染无尾线虫的雌性沙蝇的寄生虫数量较高。dPCR定量证实了这一模式,在以无尾线虫为食的沙蝇的初始时间点检测到明显更高的寄生虫载量。然而,在后期阶段,各组之间的寄生虫负荷趋同,表明无论寄生虫感染形式如何,感染动态都具有可比性。两种方法都显示了一致的寄生虫动态模式,而dPCR在检测和量化低寄生虫负荷方面提供了更高的灵敏度,特别是在感染强度降低的时期。总的来说,我们的研究结果为寄生虫与媒介的相互作用提供了新的见解,并验证了dPCR作为一种精确而敏感的评估沙蝇媒介中利什曼原虫感染的工具,在昆虫学监测和传播研究中具有潜在的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental parasitology
Experimental parasitology 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Parasitology emphasizes modern approaches to parasitology, including molecular biology and immunology. The journal features original research papers on the physiological, metabolic, immunologic, biochemical, nutritional, and chemotherapeutic aspects of parasites and host-parasite relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书