Christoph F Dietrich, Michael Blaivas, Vito Cantisani, Xinwu Cui, Yi Dong, Ahmed El Kaffas, Adrian Goudie, Ole Graumann, Moritz Herzog, Thomas Karlas, Daniel Merkel, Kathleen Möller, Michael Bachman Nielsen, Christian Pállson Nolsoe, Peter J Snelling, Daniel Wastl, Christian Jenssen
{"title":"Handheld Ultrasound: Technical Review and International Expert Consensus Recommendations.","authors":"Christoph F Dietrich, Michael Blaivas, Vito Cantisani, Xinwu Cui, Yi Dong, Ahmed El Kaffas, Adrian Goudie, Ole Graumann, Moritz Herzog, Thomas Karlas, Daniel Merkel, Kathleen Möller, Michael Bachman Nielsen, Christian Pállson Nolsoe, Peter J Snelling, Daniel Wastl, Christian Jenssen","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics16193215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Handheld ultrasound (HHUS) is increasingly used in point-of-care imaging because of its portability, accessibility, versatility, and comparatively low cost. <b>Methods</b>: This structured narrative technical review evaluated current HHUS technology, image quality and functionality, clinical applications, regulatory considerations, and future perspectives using recent literature, comparative studies, technical sources, and previous EFSUMB/WFUMB position papers. A structured SWOT analysis informed draft recommendations, which underwent three rounds of scientific discussion and revision by a 17-member international multidisciplinary expert panel. Each of the seven final recommendations was subsequently voted on separately, with consensus predefined as ≥80% agreement. <b>Results</b>: While HHUS devices are increasingly suitable for routine clinical use, further standardization, clinician training, and regulatory alignment are essential for widespread adoption. <b>Conclusions</b>: HHUS can expand access to focused ultrasound imaging, particularly in point-of-care and resource-limited settings. Its appropriate use requires task-specific device selection, adequate training, quality assurance, and recognition of its limitations compared with comprehensive ultrasound systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"16 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13664444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16193215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Handheld ultrasound (HHUS) is increasingly used in point-of-care imaging because of its portability, accessibility, versatility, and comparatively low cost. Methods: This structured narrative technical review evaluated current HHUS technology, image quality and functionality, clinical applications, regulatory considerations, and future perspectives using recent literature, comparative studies, technical sources, and previous EFSUMB/WFUMB position papers. A structured SWOT analysis informed draft recommendations, which underwent three rounds of scientific discussion and revision by a 17-member international multidisciplinary expert panel. Each of the seven final recommendations was subsequently voted on separately, with consensus predefined as ≥80% agreement. Results: While HHUS devices are increasingly suitable for routine clinical use, further standardization, clinician training, and regulatory alignment are essential for widespread adoption. Conclusions: HHUS can expand access to focused ultrasound imaging, particularly in point-of-care and resource-limited settings. Its appropriate use requires task-specific device selection, adequate training, quality assurance, and recognition of its limitations compared with comprehensive ultrasound systems.
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.