Thromboelastographic Assessment of the Differential Sensitivity of Three Contact Activators to Coagulation Factor Deficiencies in Hemocell Environments.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Weiguo Liang, Mao Xia, Junpo Li, Fuyang Li, Bidou Wang, Haixuan Sun
{"title":"Thromboelastographic Assessment of the Differential Sensitivity of Three Contact Activators to Coagulation Factor Deficiencies in Hemocell Environments.","authors":"Weiguo Liang, Mao Xia, Junpo Li, Fuyang Li, Bidou Wang, Haixuan Sun","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics16193217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Thromboelastography (TEG) assesses global coagulation, but its sensitivity for factor deficiencies is reportedly low and may depend on the contact activator. However, the differential TEG sensitivity of contact activators for individual factor deficiencies in whole blood containing platelets and red blood cells remains unclear. This study assessed the relative sensitivity of three contact activators for detecting single coagulation factor deficiencies in reconstituted whole-blood samples using TEG. <b>Methods</b>: Reconstituted whole-blood samples with graded activities of FII, FV, FVIII, FIX, FX, FXI, and FXII were prepared by mixing platelets, plasma, and red blood cells, and analyzed by TEG using kaolin-, ellagic acid-, and colloidal silica-based activators (KL, EA and CS). Relative sensitivity was assessed via: (1) the factor activity at which R time first showed a statistically significant prolongation; (2) a novel metric, Sensitivity for Detecting Factor Deficiencies (SDFD), defined as the normalized relative change in R time, enabling comparison without reference ranges. <b>Results</b>: KL showed the broadest and highest sensitivity, detecting significant prolongation at the mildest deficiency levels for most factors. EA showed intermediate-to-high sensitivity and the highest sensitivity for FXII. CS was the least sensitive except for FV. Notably, the activity threshold of KL for exceeding the reference range was substantially lower than that for statistical significance. <b>Conclusions</b>: The sensitivity of TEG to coagulation factor deficiencies is dependent on the contact activator. KL showed the highest overall sensitivity to factor deficiencies, while EA showed the highest sensitivity for FXII deficiency under the conditions of this study. R time of KL can be significantly prolonged yet still stay within the reference range. This mismatch calls for more sensitive TEG reagents and stricter ranges.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"16 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13664188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16193217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thromboelastography (TEG) assesses global coagulation, but its sensitivity for factor deficiencies is reportedly low and may depend on the contact activator. However, the differential TEG sensitivity of contact activators for individual factor deficiencies in whole blood containing platelets and red blood cells remains unclear. This study assessed the relative sensitivity of three contact activators for detecting single coagulation factor deficiencies in reconstituted whole-blood samples using TEG. Methods: Reconstituted whole-blood samples with graded activities of FII, FV, FVIII, FIX, FX, FXI, and FXII were prepared by mixing platelets, plasma, and red blood cells, and analyzed by TEG using kaolin-, ellagic acid-, and colloidal silica-based activators (KL, EA and CS). Relative sensitivity was assessed via: (1) the factor activity at which R time first showed a statistically significant prolongation; (2) a novel metric, Sensitivity for Detecting Factor Deficiencies (SDFD), defined as the normalized relative change in R time, enabling comparison without reference ranges. Results: KL showed the broadest and highest sensitivity, detecting significant prolongation at the mildest deficiency levels for most factors. EA showed intermediate-to-high sensitivity and the highest sensitivity for FXII. CS was the least sensitive except for FV. Notably, the activity threshold of KL for exceeding the reference range was substantially lower than that for statistical significance. Conclusions: The sensitivity of TEG to coagulation factor deficiencies is dependent on the contact activator. KL showed the highest overall sensitivity to factor deficiencies, while EA showed the highest sensitivity for FXII deficiency under the conditions of this study. R time of KL can be significantly prolonged yet still stay within the reference range. This mismatch calls for more sensitive TEG reagents and stricter ranges.

血栓弹性成像评估三种接触激活剂对血细胞环境中凝血因子缺乏的不同敏感性。
背景:血栓弹性成像(TEG)评估整体凝血,但据报道其对因子缺乏的敏感性较低,可能取决于接触激活剂。然而,接触激活剂对含血小板和红细胞的全血中个体因子缺乏的TEG敏感性差异尚不清楚。本研究评估了三种接触活化剂在用TEG检测重组全血样品中单一凝血因子缺乏的相对敏感性。方法:通过混合血小板、血浆和红细胞制备FII、FV、FVIII、FIX、FX、FXI和FXII活性分级的重组全血样品,并使用高岭土、花藻酸和胶体硅基活化剂(KL、EA和CS)进行TEG分析。通过以下方法评估相对敏感性:(1)R时间首次出现统计学显著延长的因子活性;(2)一种新的度量,检测因子缺陷的灵敏度(SDFD),定义为R时间的标准化相对变化,可以在没有参考范围的情况下进行比较。结果:KL表现出最广泛和最高的敏感性,在大多数因素的轻度缺乏水平下检测到显著的延长。EA对FXII具有中高灵敏度,灵敏度最高。除FV外,CS最不敏感。值得注意的是,KL超过参考范围的活性阈值明显低于有统计学意义的阈值。结论:TEG对凝血因子缺乏的敏感性取决于接触激活剂。在本研究条件下,KL对因子缺乏的总体敏感性最高,而EA对FXII缺乏的敏感性最高。KL的R时间可以显著延长,但仍保持在参考范围内。这种不匹配需要更敏感的TEG试剂和更严格的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书