From bench to theatre: coronary anastomosis simulation in early UK cardiothoracic training - a review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
F S Mubarak, Y Haqzad, B Evans
{"title":"From bench to theatre: coronary anastomosis simulation in early UK cardiothoracic training - a review.","authors":"F S Mubarak, Y Haqzad, B Evans","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2026.0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronary anastomosis and artery bypass grafting remain fundamental components of cardiothoracic surgical practice. We review coronary anastomosis simulators, compare their educational evidence and practical trade-offs, and propose incorporation of simulation longitudinally into early UK cardiothoracic training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar was undertaken for English-language publications from January 2000 to August 2026. Reference lists of relevant reviews were hand-searched. UK policy and programme material was identified from the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme, the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland and associated professional sources. Studies describing a simulator, educational intervention, validation, assessment or transfer outcome were prioritised.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Low-fidelity models, including silicone tubes, foam-based vessels, and 3D-printed constructs, provide affordable and accessible opportunities for repetitive practice and early skills acquisition. High-fidelity simulators, such as beating-heart systems, offer enhanced realism suitable for advanced training levels. Biological models deliver superior anatomical fidelity but present logistical and cost limitations. Across modalities, simulation training consistently improves technical performance, including suture quality, procedural precision, OSATS scores and anastomosis time. Evidence demonstrating transfer of simulator-acquired skills to real operative performance remains sparse. Current UK training delivers simulation primarily through isolated short courses rather than structured longitudinal curricula.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation-based coronary anastomosis training is a valuable tool for front-loading technical skill acquisition in early cardiothoracic training. Educational impact is driven less by fidelity and more by structured curricula, deliberate practice and timely feedback. Future priorities include national standardisation, validation of clinical skill transfer and improving equitable access to simulation resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2026.0102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary anastomosis and artery bypass grafting remain fundamental components of cardiothoracic surgical practice. We review coronary anastomosis simulators, compare their educational evidence and practical trade-offs, and propose incorporation of simulation longitudinally into early UK cardiothoracic training.

Methods: A search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar was undertaken for English-language publications from January 2000 to August 2026. Reference lists of relevant reviews were hand-searched. UK policy and programme material was identified from the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme, the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland and associated professional sources. Studies describing a simulator, educational intervention, validation, assessment or transfer outcome were prioritised.

Findings: Low-fidelity models, including silicone tubes, foam-based vessels, and 3D-printed constructs, provide affordable and accessible opportunities for repetitive practice and early skills acquisition. High-fidelity simulators, such as beating-heart systems, offer enhanced realism suitable for advanced training levels. Biological models deliver superior anatomical fidelity but present logistical and cost limitations. Across modalities, simulation training consistently improves technical performance, including suture quality, procedural precision, OSATS scores and anastomosis time. Evidence demonstrating transfer of simulator-acquired skills to real operative performance remains sparse. Current UK training delivers simulation primarily through isolated short courses rather than structured longitudinal curricula.

Conclusions: Simulation-based coronary anastomosis training is a valuable tool for front-loading technical skill acquisition in early cardiothoracic training. Educational impact is driven less by fidelity and more by structured curricula, deliberate practice and timely feedback. Future priorities include national standardisation, validation of clinical skill transfer and improving equitable access to simulation resources.

从长凳到手术室:早期英国心胸训练中的冠状动脉吻合模拟-综述。
导言:冠状动脉吻合和动脉搭桥术仍然是心胸外科实践的基本组成部分。我们回顾了冠状动脉吻合模拟器,比较了它们的教育证据和实际权衡,并建议将模拟纵向纳入早期英国心胸训练。方法:检索2000年1月至2026年8月PubMed/MEDLINE和谷歌Scholar的英文出版物。手工检索相关综述的参考文献列表。英国的政策和项目材料是从校际外科课程计划、英国和爱尔兰心胸外科学会以及相关的专业资源中确定的。描述模拟器、教育干预、验证、评估或转移结果的研究被优先考虑。研究结果:低保真度模型,包括硅胶管、泡沫容器和3d打印结构,为重复练习和早期技能习得提供了经济实惠的机会。高保真模拟器,如心跳系统,提供了增强的真实感,适合高级训练水平。生物模型提供了优越的解剖学保真度,但存在物流和成本限制。在各种模式下,模拟训练持续提高技术性能,包括缝合质量、手术精度、OSATS评分和吻合时间。证明从模拟器获得的技能转化为实际操作能力的证据仍然很少。目前英国的培训主要通过孤立的短期课程而不是结构化的纵向课程来提供模拟。结论:基于模拟的冠状动脉吻合训练是早期心胸训练中前负荷技术技能习得的重要工具。教育的影响更多地取决于结构化的课程、刻意的练习和及时的反馈,而不是忠实度。未来的优先事项包括国家标准化、临床技能转移的验证和改善对模拟资源的公平获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书