Influence of Breed on Tracheal Diameter and Endotracheal Tube Size Selection in Dogs: A Retrospective Analysis.

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animals Pub Date : 2026-10-01 DOI:10.3390/ani16193089
Jieun Kim, In Lee, Won-Gyun Son, Inhyung Lee, Hyunseok Kim
{"title":"Influence of Breed on Tracheal Diameter and Endotracheal Tube Size Selection in Dogs: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Jieun Kim, In Lee, Won-Gyun Son, Inhyung Lee, Hyunseok Kim","doi":"10.3390/ani16193089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selecting the correct endotracheal tube (ETT) size is critical for safe anesthesia in dogs. Current ETT size recommendations are largely based on body weight (BW), although some breeds, particularly brachycephalic dogs, may receive smaller ETTs than predicted from BW alone. This two-part retrospective study was performed to evaluate the effect of breed on ETT selection. In Part 1, computed tomography (CT)-measured tracheal diameters (TD) were compared among five small dog breeds weighing 4-5 kg and having a body condition score of 5/9. In Part 2, an expanded clinical cohort of 512 dogs from eight breeds was used to compare clinically selected ETT sizes with BW-based predictions. Statistical models assessed whether breed influenced clinically used ETT sizes after accounting for body mass using the cube root of BW. CT measurements revealed that TD differed significantly among breeds within a similar body-weight range. In the Part 2 clinical cohort, clinically selected ETT size was significantly associated with breed, the cube root of BW, and their interaction. Shih Tzus, French Bulldogs, Pekingese, and Boston Terriers had clinically selected ETT sizes smaller than BW-based predicted sizes, with a median discrepancy of approximately 0.5 mm in Shih Tzus and approximately 1.0 mm in French Bulldogs, Pekingese, and Boston Terriers. These findings suggest that the magnitude of discrepancy from BW-based predictions varies among brachycephalic breeds, indicating that breed may warrant consideration when estimating ETT size.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"16 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13663563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16193089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selecting the correct endotracheal tube (ETT) size is critical for safe anesthesia in dogs. Current ETT size recommendations are largely based on body weight (BW), although some breeds, particularly brachycephalic dogs, may receive smaller ETTs than predicted from BW alone. This two-part retrospective study was performed to evaluate the effect of breed on ETT selection. In Part 1, computed tomography (CT)-measured tracheal diameters (TD) were compared among five small dog breeds weighing 4-5 kg and having a body condition score of 5/9. In Part 2, an expanded clinical cohort of 512 dogs from eight breeds was used to compare clinically selected ETT sizes with BW-based predictions. Statistical models assessed whether breed influenced clinically used ETT sizes after accounting for body mass using the cube root of BW. CT measurements revealed that TD differed significantly among breeds within a similar body-weight range. In the Part 2 clinical cohort, clinically selected ETT size was significantly associated with breed, the cube root of BW, and their interaction. Shih Tzus, French Bulldogs, Pekingese, and Boston Terriers had clinically selected ETT sizes smaller than BW-based predicted sizes, with a median discrepancy of approximately 0.5 mm in Shih Tzus and approximately 1.0 mm in French Bulldogs, Pekingese, and Boston Terriers. These findings suggest that the magnitude of discrepancy from BW-based predictions varies among brachycephalic breeds, indicating that breed may warrant consideration when estimating ETT size.

犬种对犬气管直径和气管导管尺寸选择的影响:回顾性分析。
选择正确的气管插管(ETT)尺寸对狗的安全麻醉至关重要。目前的ETT大小建议主要基于体重(BW),尽管某些品种,特别是短头犬,其ETT可能比仅根据BW预测的要小。本研究分为两部分进行回顾性研究,以评估品种对ETT选择的影响。在第一部分中,比较了体重为4-5 kg、身体状况评分为5/9的5种小型犬的CT测量的气管直径(TD)。在第2部分中,对来自8个品种的512只狗的临床队列进行了扩展,以比较临床选择的ETT大小与基于体重的预测。统计模型评估了在使用体重的立方根计算体重后,品种是否影响临床使用的ETT大小。CT测量显示,在相似体重范围内,犬种之间的TD差异显著。在第2部分临床队列中,临床选择的ETT大小与品种、体重立方根及其相互作用显著相关。西施犬、法国牛头犬、北京犬和波士顿犬的临床选择的ETT尺寸小于基于体重的预测尺寸,西施犬的中位差异约为0.5 mm,法国牛头犬、北京犬和波士顿犬的中位差异约为1.0 mm。这些发现表明,基于体重预测的差异程度在短头畸形品种之间有所不同,表明在估计ETT大小时可能需要考虑品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书