Short-Term Outcomes of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Patients With and Without Preoperative Neoadjuvant Therapy.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Takafumi Shima, Hiroki Hamamoto, Takeru Matsuda, Ichiro Takemasa, Keitaro Tanaka, Toshiki Mukai, Jun Watanabe, Sang-Woong Lee, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Takeshi Naitoh
{"title":"Short-Term Outcomes of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Patients With and Without Preoperative Neoadjuvant Therapy.","authors":"Takafumi Shima, Hiroki Hamamoto, Takeru Matsuda, Ichiro Takemasa, Keitaro Tanaka, Toshiki Mukai, Jun Watanabe, Sang-Woong Lee, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Takeshi Naitoh","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the association between preoperative neoadjuvant therapy and short-term outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent transanal total mesorectal excision at 26 Japanese institutions between 2012 and 2019. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were matched 1:1 with patients who did not. Perioperative, postoperative, and pathological outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 294 patients (147 per group) were analyzed. Operative time was longer in the neoadjuvant therapy group than in the non-neoadjuvant therapy group (median, 510.0 vs. 382.0 min), with an adjusted mean difference of 129.25 min (95% CI, 87.90-170.59; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications occurred in 18/147 patients (12.2%) without neoadjuvant therapy and 16/147 (10.9%) with neoadjuvant therapy (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.44-1.85; <i>p</i> = 0.769). Full-cohort conventional and Firth logistic analyses and marginal standardization likewise did not identify a statistically significant association. Neoadjuvant therapy remained associated with longer operative time after adjustment for operative procedure, lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, and abdominal approach. Resection-margin involvement did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with longer operative time during transanal total mesorectal excision, whereas no statistically significant association with severe postoperative morbidity was detected. Sensitivity analyses likewise did not identify a statistically significant association, supporting the technical feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant therapy in experienced centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13664725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the association between preoperative neoadjuvant therapy and short-term outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent transanal total mesorectal excision at 26 Japanese institutions between 2012 and 2019. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were matched 1:1 with patients who did not. Perioperative, postoperative, and pathological outcomes were compared.

Results: After matching, 294 patients (147 per group) were analyzed. Operative time was longer in the neoadjuvant therapy group than in the non-neoadjuvant therapy group (median, 510.0 vs. 382.0 min), with an adjusted mean difference of 129.25 min (95% CI, 87.90-170.59; p < 0.001). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications occurred in 18/147 patients (12.2%) without neoadjuvant therapy and 16/147 (10.9%) with neoadjuvant therapy (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.44-1.85; p = 0.769). Full-cohort conventional and Firth logistic analyses and marginal standardization likewise did not identify a statistically significant association. Neoadjuvant therapy remained associated with longer operative time after adjustment for operative procedure, lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, and abdominal approach. Resection-margin involvement did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with longer operative time during transanal total mesorectal excision, whereas no statistically significant association with severe postoperative morbidity was detected. Sensitivity analyses likewise did not identify a statistically significant association, supporting the technical feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant therapy in experienced centers.

经肛门直肠全肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的短期预后:一项多中心倾向评分匹配分析,比较术前接受和未接受新辅助治疗的患者。
目的:探讨直肠癌经肛门全肠系膜切除术术前新辅助治疗与近期预后的关系。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2019年在日本26家机构接受经肛门全肠系膜切除术的患者。接受新辅助治疗的患者与未接受新辅助治疗的患者1:1匹配。比较围手术期、术后和病理结果。结果:配对后分析294例(每组147例)。新辅助治疗组的手术时间较非新辅助治疗组长(中位数510.0 vs. 382.0 min),调整后的平均差异为129.25 min (95% CI, 87.90 ~ 170.59; p p = 0.769)。全队列常规和Firth逻辑分析和边际标准化同样没有发现统计学上显著的关联。在调整手术方式、骨盆外侧淋巴结清扫和腹部入路后,新辅助治疗仍与较长的手术时间相关。两组间切除缘受累无显著差异。结论:新辅助治疗与经肛全肠系膜切除术手术时间延长相关,但与术后严重并发症无统计学意义。敏感性分析同样没有发现统计学上显著的关联,支持在经验丰富的中心进行新辅助治疗后经肛门全肠系膜切除术的技术可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书