Capsulectomy Following Breast Implant Removal: Evidence-Based Indications and a Framework for Clinical Decision-Making.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Tim Brown MChir
{"title":"Capsulectomy Following Breast Implant Removal: Evidence-Based Indications and a Framework for Clinical Decision-Making.","authors":"Tim Brown MChir","doi":"10.1007/s00266-026-06365-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The question of when capsulectomy is genuinely indicated at the time of breast implant removal has important implications for clinical practice, surgical risk, and patient counselling. This review defines the evidence-based indications for capsulectomy, evaluates the evidence for each of the additional contexts in which it is commonly proposed, and provides a clinical decision framework to assist surgeons in counselling patients and documenting clinical reasoning. No published study directly compares outcomes of explantation with capsulectomy versus explantation alone; the most rigorous prospective data show that explantation without capsulectomy produces symptom improvement statistically indistinguishable from partial or total capsulectomy. The only pre-registered controlled cohort study (n = 9590) found no difference in BII symptom prevalence between women with and without implants, and silicone particle migration to lymph nodes is not reduced by capsulectomy in controlled analyses. The proposed capsular contaminants (biofilm, fungal elements, and heavy metals) have each been examined in controlled tissue analyses; none differentiates symptomatic from asymptomatic patients. A 2024 European expert consensus recommending capsulectomy for macrotextured implants constitutes Level V consensus from a panel composed exclusively of surgeons who perform the procedure. Capsulectomy carries a higher complication rate than explantation alone, and no published evidence documents harm from leaving a capsule in situ after benign explantation. Four indications are supported by the available evidence: confirmed BIA-ALCL, confirmed capsular malignancy, symptomatic capsular calcification with demonstrable mammographic impairment, and Grade III-IV contracture where capsulotomy is insufficient. A clinical decision framework is provided to facilitate evidence-based practice and structured informed consent. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-026-06365-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of when capsulectomy is genuinely indicated at the time of breast implant removal has important implications for clinical practice, surgical risk, and patient counselling. This review defines the evidence-based indications for capsulectomy, evaluates the evidence for each of the additional contexts in which it is commonly proposed, and provides a clinical decision framework to assist surgeons in counselling patients and documenting clinical reasoning. No published study directly compares outcomes of explantation with capsulectomy versus explantation alone; the most rigorous prospective data show that explantation without capsulectomy produces symptom improvement statistically indistinguishable from partial or total capsulectomy. The only pre-registered controlled cohort study (n = 9590) found no difference in BII symptom prevalence between women with and without implants, and silicone particle migration to lymph nodes is not reduced by capsulectomy in controlled analyses. The proposed capsular contaminants (biofilm, fungal elements, and heavy metals) have each been examined in controlled tissue analyses; none differentiates symptomatic from asymptomatic patients. A 2024 European expert consensus recommending capsulectomy for macrotextured implants constitutes Level V consensus from a panel composed exclusively of surgeons who perform the procedure. Capsulectomy carries a higher complication rate than explantation alone, and no published evidence documents harm from leaving a capsule in situ after benign explantation. Four indications are supported by the available evidence: confirmed BIA-ALCL, confirmed capsular malignancy, symptomatic capsular calcification with demonstrable mammographic impairment, and Grade III-IV contracture where capsulotomy is insufficient. A clinical decision framework is provided to facilitate evidence-based practice and structured informed consent. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

乳房植入物移除后的包膜切除术:循证指征和临床决策框架。
当乳房植入物移除时,何时真正指囊切除术的问题对临床实践、手术风险和患者咨询具有重要意义。本综述定义了包膜切除术的循证适应症,评估了通常提出的每一种附加情况的证据,并提供了一个临床决策框架,以协助外科医生咨询患者并记录临床推理。没有发表的研究直接比较外植体联合包膜切除与单独外植体的结果;最严格的前瞻性数据显示,不切除荚膜的体外移植术与部分或全部荚膜切除术相比,在统计学上无法区分症状的改善。唯一一项预先注册的对照队列研究(n = 9590)发现,植入和未植入植入物的女性在BII症状患病率方面没有差异,并且在对照分析中,硅胶颗粒向淋巴结的迁移并没有减少。提出的荚膜污染物(生物膜、真菌元素和重金属)都在对照组织分析中进行了检查;没有区分有症状和无症状患者。2024年欧洲专家一致建议对大结构植入物进行包膜切除术,这是由执行该手术的外科医生组成的专门小组达成的V级共识。囊切除术的并发症发生率比单纯的外植术高,并且没有发表的证据表明在良性外植术后将囊保留在原位会造成伤害。现有证据支持四种适应症:确诊的BIA-ALCL,确诊的包膜恶性肿瘤,有症状的包膜钙化,明显的乳房x线检查损害,以及III-IV级包膜挛缩,不充分的包膜切开。提供临床决策框架,以促进循证实践和结构化知情同意。证据等级V本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书