App-based or Live Patient Education before Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
A DE Smet, D Duhamel, D VAN Schaik, Y Tan, T Scheerlinck
{"title":"App-based or Live Patient Education before Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"A DE Smet, D Duhamel, D VAN Schaik, Y Tan, T Scheerlinck","doi":"10.52628/92.3.14939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The isolated effect of preoperative patient education on hospital length of stay (LOS) is controversial. Various educational modalities exist, yet evidence of their comparative effectiveness remains limited. We compared the effect of different preoperative education methods on LOS, postoperative outcomes, and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing primary THA. In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 79 patients scheduled for primary THA were allocated to one of three groups: 29 received only a booklet and information during the preoperative outpatient clinic, 24 received an additional live information session and 26 used an additional mobile application. The primary outcomes were LOS and patient satisfaction regarding the information method. Secondary outcomes included Oxford Hip Score, EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS. Mean LOS was 4.25 ± 3 days, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.525). Overall, there were no significant differences in satisfaction with the education method (p = 0.997) and its informational content (p = 0.365) between the groups. Patients in the mobile application group reported slightly higher motivation for pre- and postoperative exercises, though this was not statistically significant. All groups showed significant improvements in PROMs postoperatively (p < 0.001), with no significant differences in the magnitude of change between groups. The method of preoperative education did not significantly influence LOS, patient satisfaction, or postoperative outcomes in THA patients. The additional cost of implementing preoperative live sessions and mobile applications to provide additional information must be weighed against the limited benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"92 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/92.3.14939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The isolated effect of preoperative patient education on hospital length of stay (LOS) is controversial. Various educational modalities exist, yet evidence of their comparative effectiveness remains limited. We compared the effect of different preoperative education methods on LOS, postoperative outcomes, and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing primary THA. In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 79 patients scheduled for primary THA were allocated to one of three groups: 29 received only a booklet and information during the preoperative outpatient clinic, 24 received an additional live information session and 26 used an additional mobile application. The primary outcomes were LOS and patient satisfaction regarding the information method. Secondary outcomes included Oxford Hip Score, EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS. Mean LOS was 4.25 ± 3 days, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.525). Overall, there were no significant differences in satisfaction with the education method (p = 0.997) and its informational content (p = 0.365) between the groups. Patients in the mobile application group reported slightly higher motivation for pre- and postoperative exercises, though this was not statistically significant. All groups showed significant improvements in PROMs postoperatively (p < 0.001), with no significant differences in the magnitude of change between groups. The method of preoperative education did not significantly influence LOS, patient satisfaction, or postoperative outcomes in THA patients. The additional cost of implementing preoperative live sessions and mobile applications to provide additional information must be weighed against the limited benefits.

髋关节置换术前基于应用程序或现场患者教育:一项随机对照试验。
术前患者教育对住院时间(LOS)的孤立影响存在争议。存在着各种各样的教育模式,但证明其相对有效性的证据仍然有限。我们比较了不同术前教育方法对原发性全髋关节置换术患者LOS、术后结局和患者满意度的影响。在这项前瞻性、随机对照试验中,79名计划进行原发性THA的患者被分为三组:29名患者在术前门诊时仅获得小册子和信息,24名患者获得额外的实时信息会话,26名患者使用额外的移动应用程序。主要结果是LOS和患者对信息方法的满意度。次要结局包括牛津髋关节评分、EQ-5D-3L和EQ-VAS。平均生存时间为4.25±3天,两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.525)。总体而言,两组学生对教育方法的满意度(p = 0.997)和教育内容的满意度(p = 0.365)无显著差异。使用移动应用程序组的患者在术前和术后锻炼的动机稍高,尽管这没有统计学意义。所有组术后PROMs均有显著改善(p < 0.001),组间变化幅度无显著差异。术前教育方法对THA患者的LOS、患者满意度或术后结局没有显著影响。实施术前现场会议和提供额外信息的移动应用程序的额外成本必须与有限的好处进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书