Reframing Trisomy 13 and 18 Care: Moving Beyond the Myth of "Incompatibility With Life" in a South African and Low-and Middle-Income Country Context.

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
H L Malherbe, M Araujo, L Balimba, J A Joshi, P Makhetha, M Meiring, M T Mpe, D Reddy, B Shingwenyana, J C Carey
{"title":"Reframing Trisomy 13 and 18 Care: Moving Beyond the Myth of \"Incompatibility With Life\" in a South African and Low-and Middle-Income Country Context.","authors":"H L Malherbe, M Araujo, L Balimba, J A Joshi, P Makhetha, M Meiring, M T Mpe, D Reddy, B Shingwenyana, J C Carey","doi":"10.1002/ajmg.a.70328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trisomy 13 (T13) and trisomy 18 (T18) have historically been described as \"lethal\" or \"incompatible with life,\" contributing to diagnosis-based limitations of care. Contemporary evidence demonstrates greater heterogeneity in survival and outcomes than previously recognized, including among selected children receiving intensive care or cardiac surgery. Parental perspectives further challenge assumptions that quality of life and benefit can be inferred from diagnosis alone. This Commentary draws on contemporary evidence and multidisciplinary stakeholder discussions convened in Johannesburg in August 2025 to consider the implications for South Africa and comparable resource-constrained settings. South African pathways are shaped by inequities between public and private healthcare, uneven access to prenatal screening and diagnosis, limited specialist capacity, variable referral and care coordination, and the absence of nationally standardized T13/T18-specific guidance. Published local evidence on survival, intervention and family experiences remains limited. We argue that T13/T18 should be approached as medically complex and potentially life-limiting conditions requiring transparent, individualized and proportionate decision-making rather than predetermined non-intervention. Priorities include strengthened professional training, coordinated multidisciplinary referral pathways, balanced counselling and shared decision-making, integration of palliative care alongside disease-directed care, regional centers of expertise, improved data generation, rights-aligned governance and contextually appropriate adaptation of international guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7507,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.70328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trisomy 13 (T13) and trisomy 18 (T18) have historically been described as "lethal" or "incompatible with life," contributing to diagnosis-based limitations of care. Contemporary evidence demonstrates greater heterogeneity in survival and outcomes than previously recognized, including among selected children receiving intensive care or cardiac surgery. Parental perspectives further challenge assumptions that quality of life and benefit can be inferred from diagnosis alone. This Commentary draws on contemporary evidence and multidisciplinary stakeholder discussions convened in Johannesburg in August 2025 to consider the implications for South Africa and comparable resource-constrained settings. South African pathways are shaped by inequities between public and private healthcare, uneven access to prenatal screening and diagnosis, limited specialist capacity, variable referral and care coordination, and the absence of nationally standardized T13/T18-specific guidance. Published local evidence on survival, intervention and family experiences remains limited. We argue that T13/T18 should be approached as medically complex and potentially life-limiting conditions requiring transparent, individualized and proportionate decision-making rather than predetermined non-intervention. Priorities include strengthened professional training, coordinated multidisciplinary referral pathways, balanced counselling and shared decision-making, integration of palliative care alongside disease-directed care, regional centers of expertise, improved data generation, rights-aligned governance and contextually appropriate adaptation of international guidance.

重塑13和18三体护理:在南非和中低收入国家背景下超越“与生活不相容”的神话。
13三体(T13)和18三体(T18)历来被描述为“致命”或“与生命不相容”,这导致了基于诊断的护理限制。当代证据表明,包括在接受重症监护或心脏手术的儿童中,生存和结局的异质性比以前认识到的更大。父母的观点进一步挑战了仅从诊断就能推断出生活质量和益处的假设。本评注借鉴了当代证据和2025年8月在约翰内斯堡召开的多学科利益攸关方讨论,以考虑对南非和类似资源受限环境的影响。公共和私营医疗保健之间的不平等、产前筛查和诊断的不平等、专家能力有限、转诊和护理协调不一,以及缺乏全国标准化的T13/ t18特定指导,这些都影响了南非的途径。当地发表的关于生存、干预和家庭经历的证据仍然有限。我们认为T13/T18应该被视为医学上复杂的、可能限制生命的疾病,需要透明、个性化和相称的决策,而不是预先确定的不干预。优先事项包括加强专业培训、协调多学科转诊途径、平衡咨询和共同决策、将姑息治疗与面向疾病的护理结合起来、区域专门知识中心、改进数据生成、与权利相一致的治理以及因地制宜地采用国际指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
432
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Genetics - Part A (AJMG) gives you continuous coverage of all biological and medical aspects of genetic disorders and birth defects, as well as in-depth documentation of phenotype analysis within the current context of genotype/phenotype correlations. In addition to Part A , AJMG also publishes two other parts: Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics , covering experimental and clinical investigations of the genetic mechanisms underlying neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics , guest-edited collections of thematic reviews of topical interest to the readership of AJMG .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书