Three-dimensional imaging flow cytometry: current trends and future perspectives.

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Lab on a Chip Pub Date : 2026-10-16 DOI:10.1039/d6lc00580b
Xuanwen Hua, Biagio Mandracchia, Zhi Ling, Kidan Tadesse, Hajun Yoo, Jin Yan, Ho Wai Howard Lee, Shu Jia
{"title":"Three-dimensional imaging flow cytometry: current trends and future perspectives.","authors":"Xuanwen Hua, Biagio Mandracchia, Zhi Ling, Kidan Tadesse, Hajun Yoo, Jin Yan, Ho Wai Howard Lee, Shu Jia","doi":"10.1039/d6lc00580b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imaging flow cytometry (IFC) combines microscopic techniques and flow cytometry, enabling high-throughput, population-scale single-cell analysis with rich spatial detail and high molecular specificity. To date, most established IFC platforms are fundamentally built around 2D imaging, which is inherently limited in its ability to capture the complex 3D morphology, intracellular organization, and spatially distributed molecular features of single cells under flow. Driven by the growing demand for volumetric cellular information, IFC has progressively evolved from 2D imaging toward 3D imaging flow cytometry through a variety of optical and computational strategies. Existing 3D IFC approaches typically fall into scanning-based and non-scanning modalities, depending on whether volumetric information is assembled through sequential or parallel acquisition, with each paradigm offering complementary strengths in 3D imaging performance and cytometric throughput. Here, we systematically compare the underlying principles and performance characteristics of the most representative scanning-based and non-scanning 3D IFC technologies and discuss current challenges and future opportunities to advance volumetric cytometric analysis in biomedical and translational research.</p>","PeriodicalId":85,"journal":{"name":"Lab on a Chip","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13673952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lab on a Chip","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6lc00580b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Imaging flow cytometry (IFC) combines microscopic techniques and flow cytometry, enabling high-throughput, population-scale single-cell analysis with rich spatial detail and high molecular specificity. To date, most established IFC platforms are fundamentally built around 2D imaging, which is inherently limited in its ability to capture the complex 3D morphology, intracellular organization, and spatially distributed molecular features of single cells under flow. Driven by the growing demand for volumetric cellular information, IFC has progressively evolved from 2D imaging toward 3D imaging flow cytometry through a variety of optical and computational strategies. Existing 3D IFC approaches typically fall into scanning-based and non-scanning modalities, depending on whether volumetric information is assembled through sequential or parallel acquisition, with each paradigm offering complementary strengths in 3D imaging performance and cytometric throughput. Here, we systematically compare the underlying principles and performance characteristics of the most representative scanning-based and non-scanning 3D IFC technologies and discuss current challenges and future opportunities to advance volumetric cytometric analysis in biomedical and translational research.

三维成像流式细胞术:当前趋势和未来展望。
成像流式细胞术(IFC)结合了显微技术和流式细胞术,实现了高通量、群体规模的单细胞分析,具有丰富的空间细节和高分子特异性。迄今为止,大多数已建立的IFC平台基本上都是围绕2D成像构建的,在捕捉流动中单细胞复杂的3D形态、细胞内组织和空间分布的分子特征方面存在固有的局限性。在对体积细胞信息需求不断增长的推动下,IFC通过各种光学和计算策略逐步从2D成像向3D成像流式细胞术发展。现有的3D IFC方法通常分为基于扫描和非扫描两种模式,这取决于体积信息是通过顺序采集还是并行采集来组装的,每种模式在3D成像性能和细胞分析吞吐量方面都具有互补的优势。在这里,我们系统地比较了最具代表性的基于扫描和非扫描的3D IFC技术的基本原理和性能特征,并讨论了在生物医学和转化研究中推进体积细胞分析的当前挑战和未来机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lab on a Chip
Lab on a Chip 工程技术-化学综合
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
8.20%
发文量
434
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Lab on a Chip is the premiere journal that publishes cutting-edge research in the field of miniaturization. By their very nature, microfluidic/nanofluidic/miniaturized systems are at the intersection of disciplines, spanning fundamental research to high-end application, which is reflected by the broad readership of the journal. Lab on a Chip publishes two types of papers on original research: full-length research papers and communications. Papers should demonstrate innovations, which can come from technical advancements or applications addressing pressing needs in globally important areas. The journal also publishes Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书