Post-earthquake seismic assessment of a heritage masonry school: comparative evaluation of field observation and nonlinear FE time-history analyses

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Alper Özmen, Ömer Faruk Taş, Erkut Sayın, Talha Sarıcı, Müslüm Murat Maraş
{"title":"Post-earthquake seismic assessment of a heritage masonry school: comparative evaluation of field observation and nonlinear FE time-history analyses","authors":"Alper Özmen,&nbsp;Ömer Faruk Taş,&nbsp;Erkut Sayın,&nbsp;Talha Sarıcı,&nbsp;Müslüm Murat Maraş","doi":"10.1007/s10518-026-02587-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates the seismic performance of the historic Gazi Primary School in Malatya, Türkiye, a representative example of early-period masonry architecture damaged during the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6). Reliable post-earthquake assessment of heritage masonry buildings requires the combined interpretation of field damage, material properties, soil conditions, and nonlinear seismic response. Post-earthquake field surveys documented damage patterns and identified critical structural weaknesses. Material properties of the stone and mortar were established through a combined program of non-destructive and destructive tests. Using these parameters, a detailed three-dimensional finite element model was developed, and nonlinear time-history analyses were performed with recorded strong-motion data to reproduce the building’s seismic response and identify the most vulnerable zones. The predicted numerical damage distribution was compared with observed field damage to evaluate agreement between simulations and actual behavior. Overall, the study offers practical insight into the seismic response of heritage masonry school buildings and supports more reliable post-earthquake damage assessment and decision-making for cultural heritage structures. The analyses showed that the 2023 Elbistan record produced the maximum displacement demands, while the numerical tensile damage patterns were generally consistent with the observed in-plane and out-of-plane damage zones.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"24 10","pages":"9067 - 9100"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-026-02587-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the seismic performance of the historic Gazi Primary School in Malatya, Türkiye, a representative example of early-period masonry architecture damaged during the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6). Reliable post-earthquake assessment of heritage masonry buildings requires the combined interpretation of field damage, material properties, soil conditions, and nonlinear seismic response. Post-earthquake field surveys documented damage patterns and identified critical structural weaknesses. Material properties of the stone and mortar were established through a combined program of non-destructive and destructive tests. Using these parameters, a detailed three-dimensional finite element model was developed, and nonlinear time-history analyses were performed with recorded strong-motion data to reproduce the building’s seismic response and identify the most vulnerable zones. The predicted numerical damage distribution was compared with observed field damage to evaluate agreement between simulations and actual behavior. Overall, the study offers practical insight into the seismic response of heritage masonry school buildings and supports more reliable post-earthquake damage assessment and decision-making for cultural heritage structures. The analyses showed that the 2023 Elbistan record produced the maximum displacement demands, while the numerical tensile damage patterns were generally consistent with the observed in-plane and out-of-plane damage zones.

遗址砖石学校的震后地震评估:现场观测与非线性有限元时程分析的比较评价
本研究评估了基耶省马拉提亚历史悠久的Gazi小学的抗震性能,该小学是2023年2月6日kahramanmaraku地震(7.7和7.6兆瓦)中早期砖石建筑受损的典型例子。对遗产砌体建筑进行可靠的震后评估需要综合考虑现场损伤、材料特性、土壤条件和非线性地震反应。震后实地调查记录了损坏模式,并确定了关键的结构弱点。通过非破坏性和破坏性试验相结合的方案确定了石材和砂浆的材料性能。利用这些参数,建立了详细的三维有限元模型,并使用记录的强震数据进行非线性时程分析,以重现建筑物的地震反应并确定最脆弱的区域。将预测的数值损伤分布与现场观察的损伤进行比较,以评估模拟与实际行为的一致性。总体而言,该研究为砖石学校建筑的地震反应提供了实用的见解,并为文化遗产建筑的震后损害评估和决策提供了更可靠的支持。分析表明,2023 Elbistan记录产生了最大位移需求,而数值拉伸损伤模式与观测到的面内和面外损伤区域基本一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书