Seismic performance of reinforced concrete structural systems under mainshock–aftershock sequences: insights from the 2023 Türkiye–Syria earthquakes

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Valid Aljobrani, Aydin Demir, Omar Abdulaziz Hassan
{"title":"Seismic performance of reinforced concrete structural systems under mainshock–aftershock sequences: insights from the 2023 Türkiye–Syria earthquakes","authors":"Valid Aljobrani,&nbsp;Aydin Demir,&nbsp;Omar Abdulaziz Hassan","doi":"10.1007/s10518-026-02557-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to realistic mainshock–aftershock earthquake sequences using strong-motion records from the 2023 Türkiye–Syria earthquakes, addressing the limitation of conventional seismic design approaches that primarily consider single-event loading and may not capture cumulative damage effects. Six mid-rise prototype buildings representing moment-resisting frame and dual system were designed in accordance with three generations of Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC-1975, TEC-1998/2007, and TEC-2018). Nonlinear time-history analyses were performed by sequentially applying recorded ground motions while preserving cumulative damage and residual structural states, thus enabling explicit simulation of damage accumulation across successive events. Structural performance was evaluated in terms of global stability, element-level damage, residual displacements, inter-story drifts, the reduction of the system stiffness and standard performance limits. The results show that although code evolution improves overall seismic behavior, modern code compliance does not consistently ensure satisfactory performance under mainshock–aftershock loading. All models maintained global stability; however, several exceeded Collapse prevention (CP) limits, particularly under aftershock-dominant sequences. Residual displacements remained relatively limited under mainshock-dominant loading (generally below approximately 100 mm for MF systems and about 10–12 mm for DS systems), but increased significantly under aftershock-dominant scenarios, reaching approximately 150–260 mm in MF systems and remaining below approximately 30 mm in DS systems. In addition, stiffness degradation exceeded approximately 40–60% in several cases, indicating substantial cumulative structural deformation. Dual systems reduced damage concentration and residual displacements under mainshock-dominant excitation, but their relative advantage diminished when stronger aftershocks followed prior inelastic damage, in some cases resulting in less favorable performance than moment-resisting frames. Significant residual displacements were observed even in TEC-2018-compliant buildings, indicating limitations of current design provisions in controlling post-earthquake functionality. The findings highlight the need for sequence-aware, performance-based seismic design approaches that explicitly account for cumulative damage and residual deformation demands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"24 10","pages":"8605 - 8644"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-026-02557-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to realistic mainshock–aftershock earthquake sequences using strong-motion records from the 2023 Türkiye–Syria earthquakes, addressing the limitation of conventional seismic design approaches that primarily consider single-event loading and may not capture cumulative damage effects. Six mid-rise prototype buildings representing moment-resisting frame and dual system were designed in accordance with three generations of Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC-1975, TEC-1998/2007, and TEC-2018). Nonlinear time-history analyses were performed by sequentially applying recorded ground motions while preserving cumulative damage and residual structural states, thus enabling explicit simulation of damage accumulation across successive events. Structural performance was evaluated in terms of global stability, element-level damage, residual displacements, inter-story drifts, the reduction of the system stiffness and standard performance limits. The results show that although code evolution improves overall seismic behavior, modern code compliance does not consistently ensure satisfactory performance under mainshock–aftershock loading. All models maintained global stability; however, several exceeded Collapse prevention (CP) limits, particularly under aftershock-dominant sequences. Residual displacements remained relatively limited under mainshock-dominant loading (generally below approximately 100 mm for MF systems and about 10–12 mm for DS systems), but increased significantly under aftershock-dominant scenarios, reaching approximately 150–260 mm in MF systems and remaining below approximately 30 mm in DS systems. In addition, stiffness degradation exceeded approximately 40–60% in several cases, indicating substantial cumulative structural deformation. Dual systems reduced damage concentration and residual displacements under mainshock-dominant excitation, but their relative advantage diminished when stronger aftershocks followed prior inelastic damage, in some cases resulting in less favorable performance than moment-resisting frames. Significant residual displacements were observed even in TEC-2018-compliant buildings, indicating limitations of current design provisions in controlling post-earthquake functionality. The findings highlight the need for sequence-aware, performance-based seismic design approaches that explicitly account for cumulative damage and residual deformation demands.

主余震序列下钢筋混凝土结构体系的抗震性能:来自2023年 rkiye -叙利亚地震的启示
本研究利用2023年 rkiye -叙利亚地震的强震记录,研究了钢筋混凝土建筑在真实主震-余震地震序列下的抗震性能,解决了传统地震设计方法的局限性,这些方法主要考虑单事件载荷,可能无法捕捉累积损伤效应。六座代表抗弯矩框架和双系统的中层原型建筑按照三代土耳其地震规范(TEC-1975、TEC-1998/2007和TEC-2018)设计。非线性时程分析通过连续应用记录的地面运动来进行,同时保留累积损伤和剩余结构状态,从而可以在连续事件中明确模拟损伤累积。根据整体稳定性、单元级损伤、剩余位移、层间漂移、系统刚度降低和标准性能限值对结构性能进行了评估。结果表明,尽管规范的发展改善了整体的抗震性能,但现代规范的遵从性并不能始终保证主余震荷载下令人满意的性能。所有模式都保持了全球稳定;然而,有几个超过了防止倒塌(CP)的限制,特别是在余震为主的序列下。在主震为主的载荷下,剩余位移仍然相对有限(中频系统通常低于约100毫米,中频系统约为10-12毫米),但在余震为主的情况下,剩余位移显著增加,中频系统达到约150-260毫米,中频系统保持在约30毫米以下。此外,在一些情况下,刚度退化超过约40-60%,表明大量的累积结构变形。在主震为主的激励下,双系统减少了损伤集中和残余位移,但当先前的非弹性损伤之后发生更强的余震时,它们的相对优势就会减弱,在某些情况下,它们的性能不如抗矩框架。即使在符合tec -2018标准的建筑物中也观察到明显的剩余位移,这表明当前设计规定在控制震后功能方面存在局限性。研究结果强调了对序列感知、基于性能的地震设计方法的需求,这些方法明确考虑了累积损伤和残余变形需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书