Ductility and lateral load performance of substandard RC columns retrofitted with CFRP over plastered Surface

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Ali Gurkan Genc, Medine Ispir, Alper Ilki
{"title":"Ductility and lateral load performance of substandard RC columns retrofitted with CFRP over plastered Surface","authors":"Ali Gurkan Genc,&nbsp;Medine Ispir,&nbsp;Alper Ilki","doi":"10.1007/s10518-026-02540-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seismic strengthening of existing reinforced concrete (RC) columns often involves applying carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) jackets, which typically requires the removal of existing plaster layers to ensure direct bonding. While this practice is widely adopted, it increases construction costs, prolongs retrofit duration, generates considerable plaster waste, and may damage already low-strength concrete substrates. Previous experimental research has mainly focused on CFRP jackets applied directly to bare concrete, demonstrating their effectiveness in improving load-carrying capacity and ductility. However, the combined effects of plaster thickness, plaster strength, and CFRP jacket configuration on the seismic performance of square-section columns with retained plaster layers remain insufficiently explored. This study experimentally investigates the seismic performance of eight full-scale substandard RC columns (300 × 300 × 1350 mm) constructed with low-strength concrete (~10 MPa) and widely spaced transverse reinforcement, tested under reversed cyclic lateral loading while maintaining constant high axial load ratio of 60%. The experimental variables include three plaster thicknesses (12.5, 25, and 37.5 mm), two plaster compressive strengths (~3.5 and ~8.5 MPa), and single- or double-layer CFRP jackets. Test results demonstrate that retaining the plaster layer does not prevent significant ductility enhancement; in several cases, plastered CFRP-jacketed specimens achieved drift capacities comparable to or exceeding those of unplastered counterparts. These findings provide new experimental insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of CFRP jacketing over plastered concrete surfaces, highlighting a practical retrofitting approach that minimizes construction time, and environmental impact while maintaining structural performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"24 10","pages":"8489 - 8520"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-026-02540-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-026-02540-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic strengthening of existing reinforced concrete (RC) columns often involves applying carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) jackets, which typically requires the removal of existing plaster layers to ensure direct bonding. While this practice is widely adopted, it increases construction costs, prolongs retrofit duration, generates considerable plaster waste, and may damage already low-strength concrete substrates. Previous experimental research has mainly focused on CFRP jackets applied directly to bare concrete, demonstrating their effectiveness in improving load-carrying capacity and ductility. However, the combined effects of plaster thickness, plaster strength, and CFRP jacket configuration on the seismic performance of square-section columns with retained plaster layers remain insufficiently explored. This study experimentally investigates the seismic performance of eight full-scale substandard RC columns (300 × 300 × 1350 mm) constructed with low-strength concrete (~10 MPa) and widely spaced transverse reinforcement, tested under reversed cyclic lateral loading while maintaining constant high axial load ratio of 60%. The experimental variables include three plaster thicknesses (12.5, 25, and 37.5 mm), two plaster compressive strengths (~3.5 and ~8.5 MPa), and single- or double-layer CFRP jackets. Test results demonstrate that retaining the plaster layer does not prevent significant ductility enhancement; in several cases, plastered CFRP-jacketed specimens achieved drift capacities comparable to or exceeding those of unplastered counterparts. These findings provide new experimental insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of CFRP jacketing over plastered concrete surfaces, highlighting a practical retrofitting approach that minimizes construction time, and environmental impact while maintaining structural performance.

抹灰面CFRP加固不合格钢筋混凝土柱的延性和横向荷载性能
现有钢筋混凝土(RC)柱的抗震加固通常涉及使用碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)护套,这通常需要去除现有的石膏层以确保直接粘合。虽然这种做法被广泛采用,但它增加了施工成本,延长了改造时间,产生了大量的石膏废物,并可能破坏本已低强度的混凝土基材。以往的试验研究主要集中在将CFRP夹套直接应用于裸混凝土上,证明了其在提高承载能力和延性方面的有效性。然而,石膏厚度、石膏强度和CFRP护套结构对保留石膏层的方截面柱抗震性能的综合影响尚未得到充分探讨。试验研究了8根尺寸为300 × 300 × 1350 mm、低强度混凝土(~10 MPa)和宽间距横向配筋的标准钢筋混凝土柱(300 × 300 × 1350 mm),在保持恒定高轴向荷载比为60%的情况下,在反向循环横向荷载作用下的抗震性能。实验变量包括三种石膏厚度(12.5、25和37.5 mm)、两种石膏抗压强度(~3.5和~8.5 MPa)以及单层或双层CFRP夹套。试验结果表明,保留石膏层并不妨碍显著的延性增强;在一些情况下,抹灰cfrp夹套试件的漂移能力与未抹灰试件相当或超过。这些发现为CFRP护套覆盖抹灰混凝土表面的可行性和有效性提供了新的实验见解,强调了一种实用的改造方法,可以在保持结构性能的同时最大限度地减少施工时间和对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书