{"title":"Displacement response spectra based on 2DOF system for the isolated design of railway bridges","authors":"Sen Yang, Huihui Dong, Xiuli Du, Qiang Han","doi":"10.1007/s10518-026-02586-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The displacement response spectrum is a crucial step in the displacement-based seismic design method for bridge structures. However, for seismic isolation railway bridge structures, the traditional single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) displacement response spectra cannot separately take into account the displacement requirements of the bridge piers and bearings. To address this limitation, this study develops displacement response spectra of the isolated design of railway bridges based on a simplified 2DOF system, categorized into elastic and inelastic versions according to specified design needs. These spectra comprise the peak displacement spectra of piers and bearings (i.e. PPDRS and PBDRS) and residual displacement spectra of bearings (i.e. RBDRS). The 2DOF analytical model and analysis procedure for 2DOF displacement response spectra are introduced. Subsequently, the influence of the key performance parameters of the structure on displacement response spectra is investigated, including the mass ratio (<i>r</i>), effective period of piers (<i>T</i><sub>p</sub>), effective isolated damping ratio (<i>ζ</i><sub>b</sub>), ductility ratio of bearings (<i>μ</i><sub>b</sub>), and post-yielding stiffness ratio of bearings (<i>α</i>). The results indicate that <i>r</i> and <i>T</i><sub>p</sub> exert a more pronounced influence on PPDRS, whereas the influence of <i>ζ</i><sub>b</sub>, <i>μ</i><sub>b</sub>, and <i>α</i> is more significant on PBDRS and RBDRS, with changes all exceeding 40% for key periods. Furthermore, the comparison of elastic and inelastic displacement response spectra is discussed. It shows that the displacements predicted by elastic and inelastic response spectra are with discrepancies within 25%. Accordingly, the conventional DDBD procedure is extended and refined, and an example is finally designed to validate the proposed design procedure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"24 10","pages":"9351 - 9396"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-026-02586-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The displacement response spectrum is a crucial step in the displacement-based seismic design method for bridge structures. However, for seismic isolation railway bridge structures, the traditional single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) displacement response spectra cannot separately take into account the displacement requirements of the bridge piers and bearings. To address this limitation, this study develops displacement response spectra of the isolated design of railway bridges based on a simplified 2DOF system, categorized into elastic and inelastic versions according to specified design needs. These spectra comprise the peak displacement spectra of piers and bearings (i.e. PPDRS and PBDRS) and residual displacement spectra of bearings (i.e. RBDRS). The 2DOF analytical model and analysis procedure for 2DOF displacement response spectra are introduced. Subsequently, the influence of the key performance parameters of the structure on displacement response spectra is investigated, including the mass ratio (r), effective period of piers (Tp), effective isolated damping ratio (ζb), ductility ratio of bearings (μb), and post-yielding stiffness ratio of bearings (α). The results indicate that r and Tp exert a more pronounced influence on PPDRS, whereas the influence of ζb, μb, and α is more significant on PBDRS and RBDRS, with changes all exceeding 40% for key periods. Furthermore, the comparison of elastic and inelastic displacement response spectra is discussed. It shows that the displacements predicted by elastic and inelastic response spectra are with discrepancies within 25%. Accordingly, the conventional DDBD procedure is extended and refined, and an example is finally designed to validate the proposed design procedure.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.