Effect of saddle–cable slippage on seismic performance of a multitower suspension bridge

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Xiaoxian Liu, Yudong Zhang, Nailiang Xiang, Xinchao Guang, Yongtao Zhang, Lili Liu
{"title":"Effect of saddle–cable slippage on seismic performance of a multitower suspension bridge","authors":"Xiaoxian Liu,&nbsp;Yudong Zhang,&nbsp;Nailiang Xiang,&nbsp;Xinchao Guang,&nbsp;Yongtao Zhang,&nbsp;Lili Liu","doi":"10.1007/s10518-026-02597-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the effects of saddle–cable slippage on the seismic performance of a three-tower suspension bridge. A refined friction interface was adopted to model the slippage behavior at the saddle and cable interface, which was implemented in nonlinear time-history analysis, incremental dynamic analysis, and fragility analysis. The results of the analysis indicate that compared with the fixed and single-element friction models, the refined model generates more reliable responses and captures the progressive slip propagation from the center of the saddle toward the edges. The parametric analysis shows that reducing the stiffness of the middle tower increases the displacement at the tower top and the saddle–cable slippage. Increasing the stiffness of the central buckle decreases the seismic demand of the middle tower foundation but increases the seismic demand of the side tower foundations. In addition, increasing the damping coefficient of the viscous dampers reduces the seismic responses of both the middle and side towers. The influence of traveling-wave effects cannot be ignored for long-span multitower suspension bridges because they increase the bending moment and curvature of the tower base. The fragility analysis indicates that refined saddle modeling predicts a lower damage probability for the side tower, whereas central buckles reduce the damage probability of the middle tower but increase that of the side towers, and viscous dampers reduce the damage probability of both the side and middle towers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"24 10","pages":"9451 - 9478"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-026-02597-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of saddle–cable slippage on the seismic performance of a three-tower suspension bridge. A refined friction interface was adopted to model the slippage behavior at the saddle and cable interface, which was implemented in nonlinear time-history analysis, incremental dynamic analysis, and fragility analysis. The results of the analysis indicate that compared with the fixed and single-element friction models, the refined model generates more reliable responses and captures the progressive slip propagation from the center of the saddle toward the edges. The parametric analysis shows that reducing the stiffness of the middle tower increases the displacement at the tower top and the saddle–cable slippage. Increasing the stiffness of the central buckle decreases the seismic demand of the middle tower foundation but increases the seismic demand of the side tower foundations. In addition, increasing the damping coefficient of the viscous dampers reduces the seismic responses of both the middle and side towers. The influence of traveling-wave effects cannot be ignored for long-span multitower suspension bridges because they increase the bending moment and curvature of the tower base. The fragility analysis indicates that refined saddle modeling predicts a lower damage probability for the side tower, whereas central buckles reduce the damage probability of the middle tower but increase that of the side towers, and viscous dampers reduce the damage probability of both the side and middle towers.

鞍索滑移对多塔悬索桥抗震性能的影响
本文研究了鞍索滑移对一座三塔悬索桥抗震性能的影响。采用精细化摩擦界面模型对鞍索界面滑移行为进行建模,实现非线性时程分析、增量动力分析和脆性分析。分析结果表明,与固定单元和单单元摩擦模型相比,改进后的模型产生了更可靠的响应,并捕获了从鞍座中心到边缘的渐进滑动传播。参数分析表明,减小塔身刚度会增大塔顶位移和鞍索滑移。增加中心屈曲刚度降低了中塔基础的抗震需求,但增加了侧塔基础的抗震需求。此外,增加粘性阻尼器的阻尼系数可以降低中塔和侧塔的地震响应。行波效应对大跨度多塔悬索桥的影响是不可忽视的,因为行波效应增加了塔底的弯矩和曲率。脆弱性分析表明,精细化鞍座模型预测侧塔的损伤概率较低,而中心屈曲降低了中塔的损伤概率,但增加了侧塔的损伤概率,粘性阻尼器降低了侧塔和中塔的损伤概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书