{"title":"Beyond the Farm: How Employment Shifts and Infrastructure Shape Regional Welfare in Uzbekistan","authors":"Hamid Turaev, Muhammad Taimoor, Aziza Turaeva, Nodir Abdushakhidov, Ansagay Moldakhmetov, Jiapeng Xu","doi":"10.1007/s12061-026-10036-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As Uzbekistan undergoes rapid economic transformation, this study investigates how the structural shift toward a diversified, non-farm labour market alleviates poverty across its 14 administrative regions. We quantify how this transition is conditioned by localised thresholds in physical infrastructure, digital connectivity, and human capital. Analysing a 2010–2024 macro-panel dataset, our empirical strategy employs a rigorous general-to-specific spatial econometric framework. Following exploratory spatial data analysis that confirms significant regional clustering, we primarily utilise a Two-Way Fixed Effects Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) to robustly handle cross-sectional dependence and explicitly quantify inter-regional spillovers, while deploying a Spatial Autoregressive (SAR) model to evaluate core-periphery heterogeneity. While initial estimates suggest non-farm employment (NFE) directly reduces poverty, robust spatial models reveal that this structural shift is highly conditional and often spatially conditioned. Crucially, a core-periphery heterogeneity analysis shows that expanding the NFE share yields significant poverty reduction only within Urban Core regions. In contrast, structural labour shifts in the Rural Periphery fail to reduce local poverty without a foundational baseline; instead, these isolated regions rely heavily on regional capital investment for inter-regional welfare spillovers and digital infrastructure expansion for local economic inclusion. Consequently, to sustainably bridge the spatial welfare divide, policymakers must abandon uniform interventions in favour of spatially tailored strategies, transitioning from basic digital and transport capacity-building in peripheral regions to advanced economic absorption strategies in developed hubs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46392,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-026-10036-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As Uzbekistan undergoes rapid economic transformation, this study investigates how the structural shift toward a diversified, non-farm labour market alleviates poverty across its 14 administrative regions. We quantify how this transition is conditioned by localised thresholds in physical infrastructure, digital connectivity, and human capital. Analysing a 2010–2024 macro-panel dataset, our empirical strategy employs a rigorous general-to-specific spatial econometric framework. Following exploratory spatial data analysis that confirms significant regional clustering, we primarily utilise a Two-Way Fixed Effects Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) to robustly handle cross-sectional dependence and explicitly quantify inter-regional spillovers, while deploying a Spatial Autoregressive (SAR) model to evaluate core-periphery heterogeneity. While initial estimates suggest non-farm employment (NFE) directly reduces poverty, robust spatial models reveal that this structural shift is highly conditional and often spatially conditioned. Crucially, a core-periphery heterogeneity analysis shows that expanding the NFE share yields significant poverty reduction only within Urban Core regions. In contrast, structural labour shifts in the Rural Periphery fail to reduce local poverty without a foundational baseline; instead, these isolated regions rely heavily on regional capital investment for inter-regional welfare spillovers and digital infrastructure expansion for local economic inclusion. Consequently, to sustainably bridge the spatial welfare divide, policymakers must abandon uniform interventions in favour of spatially tailored strategies, transitioning from basic digital and transport capacity-building in peripheral regions to advanced economic absorption strategies in developed hubs.
期刊介绍:
Description
The journal has an applied focus: it actively promotes the importance of geographical research in real world settings
It is policy-relevant: it seeks both a readership and contributions from practitioners as well as academics
The substantive foundation is spatial analysis: the use of quantitative techniques to identify patterns and processes within geographic environments
The combination of these points, which are fully reflected in the naming of the journal, establishes a unique position in the marketplace.
RationaleA geographical perspective has always been crucial to the understanding of the social and physical organisation of the world around us. The techniques of spatial analysis provide a powerful means for the assembly and interpretation of evidence, and thus to address critical questions about issues such as crime and deprivation, immigration and demographic restructuring, retailing activity and employment change, resource management and environmental improvement. Many of these issues are equally important to academic research as they are to policy makers and Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy aims to close the gap between these two perspectives by providing a forum for discussion of applied research in a range of different contexts
Topical and interdisciplinaryIncreasingly government organisations, administrative agencies and private businesses are requiring research to support their ‘evidence-based’ strategies or policies. Geographical location is critical in much of this work which extends across a wide range of disciplines including demography, actuarial sciences, statistics, public sector planning, business planning, economics, epidemiology, sociology, social policy, health research, environmental management.
FocusApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy will draw on applied research from diverse problem domains, such as transport, policing, education, health, environment and leisure, in different international contexts. The journal will therefore provide insights into the variations in phenomena that exist across space, it will provide evidence for comparative policy analysis between domains and between locations, and stimulate ideas about the translation of spatial analysis methods and techniques across varied policy contexts. It is essential to know how to measure, monitor and understand spatial distributions, many of which have implications for those with responsibility to plan and enhance the society and the environment in which we all exist.
Readership and Editorial BoardAs a journal focused on applications of methods of spatial analysis, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy will be of interest to scholars and students in a wide range of academic fields, to practitioners in government and administrative agencies and to consultants in private sector organisations. The Editorial Board reflects the international and multidisciplinary nature of the journal.