Integrated seismic and slope stability evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings constructed on sloping ground

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
M. S. Ujwal, N. C. Sanjay Shekar,  Vibhashree, H. N. Sridhar, Raghavendra Mahesh, K. Sahana, G. Shiva Kumar
{"title":"Integrated seismic and slope stability evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings constructed on sloping ground","authors":"M. S. Ujwal,&nbsp;N. C. Sanjay Shekar,&nbsp; Vibhashree,&nbsp;H. N. Sridhar,&nbsp;Raghavendra Mahesh,&nbsp;K. Sahana,&nbsp;G. Shiva Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s10518-026-02555-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rapid urbanization in seismic-prone hilly regions has led to an increasing demand for reinforced concrete (RC) buildings constructed on sloping ground, where structural irregularity and slope instability jointly govern safety. This study presents an integrated assessment of the seismic performance and slope stability of step-back (SB) and step-back–setback (SSB) RC buildings in hilly terrain. Eight structural configurations incorporating basements, shear walls, and bracing systems were analysed at slope angles of 20° and 25° in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016. Structural response was evaluated using response spectrum analysis in ETABS, while slope stability was assessed using the Morgenstern–Price limit equilibrium method implemented in GeoStudio (SLOPE/W), enabling simultaneous consideration of structural demand and ground safety. Results indicate that maximum top displacements (approximately 35–47 mm) for all models remain within the code limit, although simple step-back buildings on 20° slopes approach borderline safety. Inter-storey drift ratios for all configurations remain below the permissible limit of 0.004, with shear wall systems exhibiting localized drift concentration in upper storeys due to stiffness irregularity. Base shear demand is strongly influenced by structural stiffness, increasing from about 2–3 kN in flexible step-back frames to 17–18 kN in step-back–setback buildings with combined shear wall–basement systems, thereby imposing higher foundation demands. Soil–structure interaction analysis reveals that setback configurations promote more uniform base reaction distribution compared to step-back buildings. Slope stability results demonstrate high sensitivity to slope angle in weak soils, with factors of safety reducing to near-critical values at 25°, while stronger residual soils maintain adequate stability. The study highlights critical trade-offs between seismic safety, soil response, and construction economy, providing practical guidance for the design of RC buildings in seismic hilly regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"24 10","pages":"8301 - 8333"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-026-02555-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization in seismic-prone hilly regions has led to an increasing demand for reinforced concrete (RC) buildings constructed on sloping ground, where structural irregularity and slope instability jointly govern safety. This study presents an integrated assessment of the seismic performance and slope stability of step-back (SB) and step-back–setback (SSB) RC buildings in hilly terrain. Eight structural configurations incorporating basements, shear walls, and bracing systems were analysed at slope angles of 20° and 25° in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016. Structural response was evaluated using response spectrum analysis in ETABS, while slope stability was assessed using the Morgenstern–Price limit equilibrium method implemented in GeoStudio (SLOPE/W), enabling simultaneous consideration of structural demand and ground safety. Results indicate that maximum top displacements (approximately 35–47 mm) for all models remain within the code limit, although simple step-back buildings on 20° slopes approach borderline safety. Inter-storey drift ratios for all configurations remain below the permissible limit of 0.004, with shear wall systems exhibiting localized drift concentration in upper storeys due to stiffness irregularity. Base shear demand is strongly influenced by structural stiffness, increasing from about 2–3 kN in flexible step-back frames to 17–18 kN in step-back–setback buildings with combined shear wall–basement systems, thereby imposing higher foundation demands. Soil–structure interaction analysis reveals that setback configurations promote more uniform base reaction distribution compared to step-back buildings. Slope stability results demonstrate high sensitivity to slope angle in weak soils, with factors of safety reducing to near-critical values at 25°, while stronger residual soils maintain adequate stability. The study highlights critical trade-offs between seismic safety, soil response, and construction economy, providing practical guidance for the design of RC buildings in seismic hilly regions.

斜坡上钢筋混凝土建筑物地震与边坡稳定性综合评价
在地震多发的丘陵地区,快速城市化导致对在斜坡上建造的钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑的需求不断增加,这些建筑的结构不规则性和边坡失稳共同影响着安全。本文综合评价了丘陵地形中台阶后退(SB)和台阶后退(SSB)钢筋混凝土建筑的抗震性能和边坡稳定性。根据IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016,在坡度为20°和25°的情况下,对包括地下室、剪力墙和支撑系统在内的八种结构配置进行了分析。使用ETABS中的响应谱分析评估结构响应,而使用GeoStudio (slope /W)中实施的Morgenstern-Price极限平衡方法评估边坡稳定性,从而同时考虑结构需求和地面安全。结果表明,所有模型的最大顶部位移(约35-47 mm)都保持在规范限制范围内,尽管20°斜坡上的简单退后建筑接近安全边界。所有结构的层间位移比都低于0.004的允许限值,剪力墙系统由于刚度不均匀而在上层表现出局部位移集中。基础剪力需求受到结构刚度的强烈影响,从柔性退阶框架的约2-3 kN增加到退阶-退阶组合剪力墙-基底体系的17-18 kN,从而对基础提出了更高的要求。土-结构相互作用分析表明,与后退式结构相比,后退式结构的地基反力分布更为均匀。边坡稳定性结果表明,软弱土对边坡角高度敏感,在25°时安全系数降至接近临界值,而较强的残积土则保持足够的稳定性。该研究强调了地震安全、土壤反应和建筑经济之间的关键权衡,为地震丘陵区钢筋混凝土建筑的设计提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书