M. S. Ujwal, N. C. Sanjay Shekar, Vibhashree, H. N. Sridhar, Raghavendra Mahesh, K. Sahana, G. Shiva Kumar
{"title":"Integrated seismic and slope stability evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings constructed on sloping ground","authors":"M. S. Ujwal, N. C. Sanjay Shekar, Vibhashree, H. N. Sridhar, Raghavendra Mahesh, K. Sahana, G. Shiva Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s10518-026-02555-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rapid urbanization in seismic-prone hilly regions has led to an increasing demand for reinforced concrete (RC) buildings constructed on sloping ground, where structural irregularity and slope instability jointly govern safety. This study presents an integrated assessment of the seismic performance and slope stability of step-back (SB) and step-back–setback (SSB) RC buildings in hilly terrain. Eight structural configurations incorporating basements, shear walls, and bracing systems were analysed at slope angles of 20° and 25° in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016. Structural response was evaluated using response spectrum analysis in ETABS, while slope stability was assessed using the Morgenstern–Price limit equilibrium method implemented in GeoStudio (SLOPE/W), enabling simultaneous consideration of structural demand and ground safety. Results indicate that maximum top displacements (approximately 35–47 mm) for all models remain within the code limit, although simple step-back buildings on 20° slopes approach borderline safety. Inter-storey drift ratios for all configurations remain below the permissible limit of 0.004, with shear wall systems exhibiting localized drift concentration in upper storeys due to stiffness irregularity. Base shear demand is strongly influenced by structural stiffness, increasing from about 2–3 kN in flexible step-back frames to 17–18 kN in step-back–setback buildings with combined shear wall–basement systems, thereby imposing higher foundation demands. Soil–structure interaction analysis reveals that setback configurations promote more uniform base reaction distribution compared to step-back buildings. Slope stability results demonstrate high sensitivity to slope angle in weak soils, with factors of safety reducing to near-critical values at 25°, while stronger residual soils maintain adequate stability. The study highlights critical trade-offs between seismic safety, soil response, and construction economy, providing practical guidance for the design of RC buildings in seismic hilly regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"24 10","pages":"8301 - 8333"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-026-02555-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rapid urbanization in seismic-prone hilly regions has led to an increasing demand for reinforced concrete (RC) buildings constructed on sloping ground, where structural irregularity and slope instability jointly govern safety. This study presents an integrated assessment of the seismic performance and slope stability of step-back (SB) and step-back–setback (SSB) RC buildings in hilly terrain. Eight structural configurations incorporating basements, shear walls, and bracing systems were analysed at slope angles of 20° and 25° in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016. Structural response was evaluated using response spectrum analysis in ETABS, while slope stability was assessed using the Morgenstern–Price limit equilibrium method implemented in GeoStudio (SLOPE/W), enabling simultaneous consideration of structural demand and ground safety. Results indicate that maximum top displacements (approximately 35–47 mm) for all models remain within the code limit, although simple step-back buildings on 20° slopes approach borderline safety. Inter-storey drift ratios for all configurations remain below the permissible limit of 0.004, with shear wall systems exhibiting localized drift concentration in upper storeys due to stiffness irregularity. Base shear demand is strongly influenced by structural stiffness, increasing from about 2–3 kN in flexible step-back frames to 17–18 kN in step-back–setback buildings with combined shear wall–basement systems, thereby imposing higher foundation demands. Soil–structure interaction analysis reveals that setback configurations promote more uniform base reaction distribution compared to step-back buildings. Slope stability results demonstrate high sensitivity to slope angle in weak soils, with factors of safety reducing to near-critical values at 25°, while stronger residual soils maintain adequate stability. The study highlights critical trade-offs between seismic safety, soil response, and construction economy, providing practical guidance for the design of RC buildings in seismic hilly regions.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.