Lithium Experimental Application Platform (LEAP) Part 1: Secondary-Containment Architecture and Downselection Framework for Flowing Liquid Lithium Fusion Systems

IF 2.3 4区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yufan Xu, Yoichi Momozaki, Michael Hvasta, Robert Kaita, Egemen Kolemen
{"title":"Lithium Experimental Application Platform (LEAP) Part 1: Secondary-Containment Architecture and Downselection Framework for Flowing Liquid Lithium Fusion Systems","authors":"Yufan Xu,&nbsp;Yoichi Momozaki,&nbsp;Michael Hvasta,&nbsp;Robert Kaita,&nbsp;Egemen Kolemen","doi":"10.1007/s10894-026-00602-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plasma-facing components (PFCs) that incorporate flowing liquid lithium surfaces are a promising technology because they can provide a renewable interface, modify recycling, support power exhaust, and potentially connect PFCs with fuel recovery. The deployment of liquid lithium PFC technology, however, is constrained by lithium’s chemical reactivity, fire and aerosol hazards and the need for rapid experimental iteration. The Lithium Experimental Application Platform (LEAP), currently under construction at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, is being developed to test liquid lithium PFCs and their integration with fusion devices. This paper is Part 1 of a two-part study and presents a hazard-complexity metric for selecting secondary-containment architectures for flowing liquid-lithium systems. The metric is used to compare six representative containment scenarios. Based on this analysis, LEAP uses a modular, room-sized argon glovebox as an inert secondary containment boundary for a staged flowing lithium program incorporating heating, diagnostics, magnetic field exposure, and future integration with fusion devices. The analysis indicates that an inert, airtight secondary enclosure without scrubbers around an enclosed lithium loop provides a practical balance between hazard reduction and facility complexity for the present LEAP design requirements. This architecture offers a practical approach to lithium PFC development and design principles applicable to other reactive or conductive liquid metal systems. Part 2 will address the design and engineering analysis of the LEAP lithium loop.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fusion Energy","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fusion Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10894-026-00602-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plasma-facing components (PFCs) that incorporate flowing liquid lithium surfaces are a promising technology because they can provide a renewable interface, modify recycling, support power exhaust, and potentially connect PFCs with fuel recovery. The deployment of liquid lithium PFC technology, however, is constrained by lithium’s chemical reactivity, fire and aerosol hazards and the need for rapid experimental iteration. The Lithium Experimental Application Platform (LEAP), currently under construction at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, is being developed to test liquid lithium PFCs and their integration with fusion devices. This paper is Part 1 of a two-part study and presents a hazard-complexity metric for selecting secondary-containment architectures for flowing liquid-lithium systems. The metric is used to compare six representative containment scenarios. Based on this analysis, LEAP uses a modular, room-sized argon glovebox as an inert secondary containment boundary for a staged flowing lithium program incorporating heating, diagnostics, magnetic field exposure, and future integration with fusion devices. The analysis indicates that an inert, airtight secondary enclosure without scrubbers around an enclosed lithium loop provides a practical balance between hazard reduction and facility complexity for the present LEAP design requirements. This architecture offers a practical approach to lithium PFC development and design principles applicable to other reactive or conductive liquid metal systems. Part 2 will address the design and engineering analysis of the LEAP lithium loop.

锂实验应用平台(LEAP)第1部分:流动液态锂聚变系统的二次安全壳结构和下行选择框架
包含流动液态锂表面的等离子体组件(pfc)是一项很有前途的技术,因为它们可以提供可再生界面,修改回收,支持电力排放,并有可能将pfc与燃料回收连接起来。然而,液态锂PFC技术的应用受到锂的化学反应性、火灾和气溶胶危害以及快速实验迭代需求的限制。目前正在普林斯顿等离子体物理实验室建设的锂实验应用平台(LEAP)正在开发中,用于测试液态锂PFCs及其与聚变装置的集成。本文是一项由两部分组成的研究的第1部分,提出了一种用于选择流动液体锂系统的二次安全壳架构的危险复杂性度量。该度量用于比较六个具有代表性的遏制方案。基于这一分析,LEAP使用了一个模块化的、房间大小的氩气手套箱作为惰性二次密封边界,用于分阶段流动锂项目,包括加热、诊断、磁场暴露以及未来与聚变装置的集成。分析表明,在封闭的锂回路周围,一个惰性的、气密的、没有洗涤器的二次外壳,可以在降低危害和设施复杂性之间实现实际平衡,满足当前LEAP设计要求。该架构为锂PFC开发和设计原则提供了一种实用的方法,适用于其他反应性或导电液态金属系统。第2部分将介绍LEAP锂回路的设计和工程分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Fusion Energy
Journal of Fusion Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fusion Energy features original research contributions and review papers examining and the development and enhancing the knowledge base of thermonuclear fusion as a potential power source. It is designed to serve as a journal of record for the publication of original research results in fundamental and applied physics, applied science and technological development. The journal publishes qualified papers based on peer reviews. This journal also provides a forum for discussing broader policies and strategies that have played, and will continue to play, a crucial role in fusion programs. In keeping with this theme, readers will find articles covering an array of important matters concerning strategy and program direction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书