Lithium Experimental Application Platform (LEAP) Part 1: Secondary-Containment Architecture and Downselection Framework for Flowing Liquid Lithium Fusion Systems
Yufan Xu, Yoichi Momozaki, Michael Hvasta, Robert Kaita, Egemen Kolemen
{"title":"Lithium Experimental Application Platform (LEAP) Part 1: Secondary-Containment Architecture and Downselection Framework for Flowing Liquid Lithium Fusion Systems","authors":"Yufan Xu, Yoichi Momozaki, Michael Hvasta, Robert Kaita, Egemen Kolemen","doi":"10.1007/s10894-026-00602-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plasma-facing components (PFCs) that incorporate flowing liquid lithium surfaces are a promising technology because they can provide a renewable interface, modify recycling, support power exhaust, and potentially connect PFCs with fuel recovery. The deployment of liquid lithium PFC technology, however, is constrained by lithium’s chemical reactivity, fire and aerosol hazards and the need for rapid experimental iteration. The Lithium Experimental Application Platform (LEAP), currently under construction at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, is being developed to test liquid lithium PFCs and their integration with fusion devices. This paper is Part 1 of a two-part study and presents a hazard-complexity metric for selecting secondary-containment architectures for flowing liquid-lithium systems. The metric is used to compare six representative containment scenarios. Based on this analysis, LEAP uses a modular, room-sized argon glovebox as an inert secondary containment boundary for a staged flowing lithium program incorporating heating, diagnostics, magnetic field exposure, and future integration with fusion devices. The analysis indicates that an inert, airtight secondary enclosure without scrubbers around an enclosed lithium loop provides a practical balance between hazard reduction and facility complexity for the present LEAP design requirements. This architecture offers a practical approach to lithium PFC development and design principles applicable to other reactive or conductive liquid metal systems. Part 2 will address the design and engineering analysis of the LEAP lithium loop.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fusion Energy","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fusion Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10894-026-00602-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plasma-facing components (PFCs) that incorporate flowing liquid lithium surfaces are a promising technology because they can provide a renewable interface, modify recycling, support power exhaust, and potentially connect PFCs with fuel recovery. The deployment of liquid lithium PFC technology, however, is constrained by lithium’s chemical reactivity, fire and aerosol hazards and the need for rapid experimental iteration. The Lithium Experimental Application Platform (LEAP), currently under construction at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, is being developed to test liquid lithium PFCs and their integration with fusion devices. This paper is Part 1 of a two-part study and presents a hazard-complexity metric for selecting secondary-containment architectures for flowing liquid-lithium systems. The metric is used to compare six representative containment scenarios. Based on this analysis, LEAP uses a modular, room-sized argon glovebox as an inert secondary containment boundary for a staged flowing lithium program incorporating heating, diagnostics, magnetic field exposure, and future integration with fusion devices. The analysis indicates that an inert, airtight secondary enclosure without scrubbers around an enclosed lithium loop provides a practical balance between hazard reduction and facility complexity for the present LEAP design requirements. This architecture offers a practical approach to lithium PFC development and design principles applicable to other reactive or conductive liquid metal systems. Part 2 will address the design and engineering analysis of the LEAP lithium loop.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Fusion Energy features original research contributions and review papers examining and the development and enhancing the knowledge base of thermonuclear fusion as a potential power source. It is designed to serve as a journal of record for the publication of original research results in fundamental and applied physics, applied science and technological development. The journal publishes qualified papers based on peer reviews.
This journal also provides a forum for discussing broader policies and strategies that have played, and will continue to play, a crucial role in fusion programs. In keeping with this theme, readers will find articles covering an array of important matters concerning strategy and program direction.