Maximum observed magnitude of earthquakes induced by fluid injection: associated factors and predictive performance across projects

IF 1.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Hua Yu, Yong Chen, Guoyong Sui, Miao Wang, Qin Liang, JunYi Liu
{"title":"Maximum observed magnitude of earthquakes induced by fluid injection: associated factors and predictive performance across projects","authors":"Hua Yu,&nbsp;Yong Chen,&nbsp;Guoyong Sui,&nbsp;Miao Wang,&nbsp;Qin Liang,&nbsp;JunYi Liu","doi":"10.1007/s10950-026-10461-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reliable assessment of the maximum observed magnitude (M<sub>obs</sub>) of injection induced earthquakes is important for seismic risk analysis. We analyzed 50 induced seismicity records from 39 projects using three complementary analytical frameworks, with all validation grouped by Project ID. Regression adjusted for operation type assessed lithology’s additional contribution to M<sub>obs</sub>. Nested validation grouped by project compared a low capacity regularized multilayer perceptron (MLP) with ridge regression to assess predictive performance. Log linear models assessed associations between M<sub>obs</sub> and individual continuous predictors measured before the event, adjusting for fracturing depth. Operation type provided comparatively stable information, whereas broad lithological categories added no stable independent information after adjustment. Among the continuous variables, cumulative injection volume before the event defining M<sub>obs</sub> (V<sub>pre</sub>) showed the clearest positive association. In the model containing fracturing depth and V<sub>pre</sub>, the coefficient of log<sub>10</sub>(V<sub>pre</sub>) was 0.640 Mw per decade (95% confidence interval: 0.439 to 0.841; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Maximum injection pressure, maximum injection rate, and fault length showed no stable independent associations. Nested leave one project out validation using 25 complete records from 21 projects yielded an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.501, a root mean square error of 0.776 Mw, and a mean absolute error of 0.590 Mw for the MLP. Performance differences from ridge regression were uncertain, and performance was similar to the linear model containing depth and volume (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.486). Overall, operation type and cumulative injection volume provided the most consistent empirical information, with no stable additional predictive benefit from the MLP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Seismology","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-026-10461-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable assessment of the maximum observed magnitude (Mobs) of injection induced earthquakes is important for seismic risk analysis. We analyzed 50 induced seismicity records from 39 projects using three complementary analytical frameworks, with all validation grouped by Project ID. Regression adjusted for operation type assessed lithology’s additional contribution to Mobs. Nested validation grouped by project compared a low capacity regularized multilayer perceptron (MLP) with ridge regression to assess predictive performance. Log linear models assessed associations between Mobs and individual continuous predictors measured before the event, adjusting for fracturing depth. Operation type provided comparatively stable information, whereas broad lithological categories added no stable independent information after adjustment. Among the continuous variables, cumulative injection volume before the event defining Mobs (Vpre) showed the clearest positive association. In the model containing fracturing depth and Vpre, the coefficient of log10(Vpre) was 0.640 Mw per decade (95% confidence interval: 0.439 to 0.841; p < 0.001). Maximum injection pressure, maximum injection rate, and fault length showed no stable independent associations. Nested leave one project out validation using 25 complete records from 21 projects yielded an R2 of 0.501, a root mean square error of 0.776 Mw, and a mean absolute error of 0.590 Mw for the MLP. Performance differences from ridge regression were uncertain, and performance was similar to the linear model containing depth and volume (R2 = 0.486). Overall, operation type and cumulative injection volume provided the most consistent empirical information, with no stable additional predictive benefit from the MLP.

注液引起的最大观测震级:各项目的相关因素和预测性能
注震最大震级的可靠评估对地震危险性分析具有重要意义。我们使用三个互补的分析框架分析了来自39个项目的50个诱发地震活动记录,所有验证都按项目ID分组。根据操作类型进行回归调整,评估岩性对Mobs的额外贡献。按项目分组的嵌套验证将低容量正则化多层感知器(MLP)与脊回归进行比较,以评估预测性能。对数线性模型评估了Mobs与事件前测量的单个连续预测因子之间的关联,并根据压裂深度进行了调整。操作类型提供了相对稳定的信息,而广泛的岩性类别调整后没有增加稳定的独立信息。在连续变量中,事件定义群前累积注射量(Vpre)的正相关最明显。在包含压裂深度和Vpre的模型中,log10(Vpre)系数为0.640 Mw / 10年(95%置信区间:0.439 ~ 0.841;p < 0.001)。最大注入压力、最大注入速率与断层长度之间没有稳定的独立关系。使用来自21个项目的25条完整记录对一个项目进行嵌套验证,得出R2为0.501,均方根误差为0.776 Mw,平均绝对误差为0.590 Mw。脊回归的性能差异不确定,性能与包含深度和体积的线性模型相似(R2 = 0.486)。总的来说,作业类型和累积注入量提供了最一致的经验信息,MLP没有提供稳定的额外预测效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Seismology
Journal of Seismology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Seismology is an international journal specialising in all observational and theoretical aspects related to earthquake occurrence. Research topics may cover: seismotectonics, seismicity, historical seismicity, seismic source physics, strong ground motion studies, seismic hazard or risk, engineering seismology, physics of fault systems, triggered and induced seismicity, mining seismology, volcano seismology, earthquake prediction, structural investigations ranging from local to regional and global studies with a particular focus on passive experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书