Groundwater storage projection in headwater basins under different climate conditions in Southeast Brazil

IF 3.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Camila L.C. Ribeiro, Pâmela A. Melo, Jorge A. Guzman, Maria L. Chu, Carlos R. de Mello
{"title":"Groundwater storage projection in headwater basins under different climate conditions in Southeast Brazil","authors":"Camila L.C. Ribeiro,&nbsp;Pâmela A. Melo,&nbsp;Jorge A. Guzman,&nbsp;Maria L. Chu,&nbsp;Carlos R. de Mello","doi":"10.1007/s12665-026-13172-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Groundwater resources in watersheds are rapidly depleting due to increased water use. In southeastern Brazil, droughts have intensified over the past 20 years, driven by changes in temperature and rainfall regimes. This study assessed groundwater in two headwater basins with contrasting climates in Minas Gerais State, namely the Grande and Jequitinhonha River basins, under climate warming scenarios to quantify potential impacts on water storage. The selection of these watersheds was intended to serve as a reference for potential future climate impacts in this region, given that human intervention in these watersheds was relatively low over the last 20 years. This study expands upon the findings from a previous study, which assessed groundwater storage behavior based on observed time series in the same river basins. The MHD-INPE hydrological model was used for simulations, with climate projections extending through 2099. Minimum annual groundwater storage was estimated using the Brutsaert method and baseflow simulations, and the Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator were used to assess trends in groundwater storage. Our analysis revealed significant decreasing trends in groundwater storage in both watersheds. Compared with the baseline, reductions were observed in all projections, with the largest decline in the 2071–2099 projection under RCP 8.5 in the Grande River basin (74.4%), indicating that this basin may become less resilient to climate change over the century. These findings may support decision-making through water resources management tools, such as water allocation mechanisms, thereby helping mitigate impacts on the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"85 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12665-026-13172-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-026-13172-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groundwater resources in watersheds are rapidly depleting due to increased water use. In southeastern Brazil, droughts have intensified over the past 20 years, driven by changes in temperature and rainfall regimes. This study assessed groundwater in two headwater basins with contrasting climates in Minas Gerais State, namely the Grande and Jequitinhonha River basins, under climate warming scenarios to quantify potential impacts on water storage. The selection of these watersheds was intended to serve as a reference for potential future climate impacts in this region, given that human intervention in these watersheds was relatively low over the last 20 years. This study expands upon the findings from a previous study, which assessed groundwater storage behavior based on observed time series in the same river basins. The MHD-INPE hydrological model was used for simulations, with climate projections extending through 2099. Minimum annual groundwater storage was estimated using the Brutsaert method and baseflow simulations, and the Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator were used to assess trends in groundwater storage. Our analysis revealed significant decreasing trends in groundwater storage in both watersheds. Compared with the baseline, reductions were observed in all projections, with the largest decline in the 2071–2099 projection under RCP 8.5 in the Grande River basin (74.4%), indicating that this basin may become less resilient to climate change over the century. These findings may support decision-making through water resources management tools, such as water allocation mechanisms, thereby helping mitigate impacts on the future.

巴西东南部不同气候条件下水源盆地地下水储存量预测
由于用水增加,流域地下水资源正在迅速枯竭。在巴西东南部,由于温度和降雨制度的变化,过去20年来干旱加剧。本研究评估了在气候变暖情景下,米纳斯吉拉斯州Grande河和Jequitinhonha河两个不同气候的水源流域的地下水,以量化对储水量的潜在影响。考虑到过去20年来这些流域的人为干预相对较少,选择这些流域的目的是为该地区未来潜在的气候影响提供参考。这项研究扩展了之前一项研究的发现,该研究基于在同一河流流域观察到的时间序列评估了地下水储存行为。使用MHD-INPE水文模型进行模拟,气候预估可延伸至2099年。使用Brutsaert方法和基流模拟估算了年最低地下水储存量,并使用Mann-Kendall试验和Sen 's slope estimator来评估地下水储存量的趋势。我们的分析显示,这两个流域的地下水储存量都有显著减少的趋势。与基线相比,所有预估都出现了减少,其中在RCP 8.5下的2071-2099年预估中降幅最大(74.4%),表明该流域在本世纪内对气候变化的适应能力可能会降低。这些发现可以通过水资源管理工具(如水资源分配机制)支持决策,从而帮助减轻对未来的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书