Camila L.C. Ribeiro, Pâmela A. Melo, Jorge A. Guzman, Maria L. Chu, Carlos R. de Mello
{"title":"Groundwater storage projection in headwater basins under different climate conditions in Southeast Brazil","authors":"Camila L.C. Ribeiro, Pâmela A. Melo, Jorge A. Guzman, Maria L. Chu, Carlos R. de Mello","doi":"10.1007/s12665-026-13172-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Groundwater resources in watersheds are rapidly depleting due to increased water use. In southeastern Brazil, droughts have intensified over the past 20 years, driven by changes in temperature and rainfall regimes. This study assessed groundwater in two headwater basins with contrasting climates in Minas Gerais State, namely the Grande and Jequitinhonha River basins, under climate warming scenarios to quantify potential impacts on water storage. The selection of these watersheds was intended to serve as a reference for potential future climate impacts in this region, given that human intervention in these watersheds was relatively low over the last 20 years. This study expands upon the findings from a previous study, which assessed groundwater storage behavior based on observed time series in the same river basins. The MHD-INPE hydrological model was used for simulations, with climate projections extending through 2099. Minimum annual groundwater storage was estimated using the Brutsaert method and baseflow simulations, and the Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator were used to assess trends in groundwater storage. Our analysis revealed significant decreasing trends in groundwater storage in both watersheds. Compared with the baseline, reductions were observed in all projections, with the largest decline in the 2071–2099 projection under RCP 8.5 in the Grande River basin (74.4%), indicating that this basin may become less resilient to climate change over the century. These findings may support decision-making through water resources management tools, such as water allocation mechanisms, thereby helping mitigate impacts on the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"85 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12665-026-13172-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-026-13172-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Groundwater resources in watersheds are rapidly depleting due to increased water use. In southeastern Brazil, droughts have intensified over the past 20 years, driven by changes in temperature and rainfall regimes. This study assessed groundwater in two headwater basins with contrasting climates in Minas Gerais State, namely the Grande and Jequitinhonha River basins, under climate warming scenarios to quantify potential impacts on water storage. The selection of these watersheds was intended to serve as a reference for potential future climate impacts in this region, given that human intervention in these watersheds was relatively low over the last 20 years. This study expands upon the findings from a previous study, which assessed groundwater storage behavior based on observed time series in the same river basins. The MHD-INPE hydrological model was used for simulations, with climate projections extending through 2099. Minimum annual groundwater storage was estimated using the Brutsaert method and baseflow simulations, and the Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator were used to assess trends in groundwater storage. Our analysis revealed significant decreasing trends in groundwater storage in both watersheds. Compared with the baseline, reductions were observed in all projections, with the largest decline in the 2071–2099 projection under RCP 8.5 in the Grande River basin (74.4%), indicating that this basin may become less resilient to climate change over the century. These findings may support decision-making through water resources management tools, such as water allocation mechanisms, thereby helping mitigate impacts on the future.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.